Joint Coordination Organizes to Form the Task-Dependent Trajectory of the Body Center of Mass
- 1 Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University of Science, Sapporo, Japan
- 2 Faculty of Medical Science and Welfare, Tohoku Bunka Gakuen University, Sendai, Japan
- 3 Department of Sport and Physical Education, Chukyo University, Toyota, Japan
Abstract
As the central nervous system controls whole-body motion, which involves multi-joint movement, certain problems with regard to the number of variables controlled by the central nervous system arise ( i.e ., the “degree of freedom problem”). The central nervous system solves these problems not by controlling joint movements, but rather by controlling only the task-dependent center of mass (COM) position of the whole body. Although uncontrolled joint movement should be organized in a coordinate manner to form the task-dependent COM position, it is unclear what kind of law joint coordination is organized by. Hence, in the present study, we aim to clarify the shape of joint coordination by elucidating the mutual relationship between the COM trajectory and joint movement during whole-body motion. Downward squatting motions with five trunk angles are recorded by using a 3-D motion analysis system in 8 healthy males. The COM trajectory shows a task-dependent path in all trunk conditions. The shank angle decreases with an increase in the trunk angle to produce the task-dependent COM trajectory, whereas the thigh showsd a constant angle. These findings demonstrate that the COM trajectory is constrained by biomechanical dynamics and minimum muscle torques, and that the joints are organized into a lawful coordinative structure to form the COM trajectory.
- Saunders, J.B., Inman, V.T. and Eberhart, H.D. (1953) The Major Determinants in Normal and Pathological Gait. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 35-A, 543-558.
- Bernstein, N.A. (1996) On Dexterity And its Development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., New Jersey.
- Bernstein, N.A. (1967) The Coordination and Regulation of Movements. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
- Scholz, J.P. and Schoner, G. (1999) The Uncontrolled Manifold Concept: Identifying Control Variables for a Functional Task. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 289-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002210050738
- Reisman, D.S., Scholz, J.P. and Schoner, G. (2002) Coordination Underlying the Control of Whole Body Momentum during Sit-to-Stand. Gait & Posture, 15, 45-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00158-8
- Scholz, J.P., Schoner, G., Hsu, W.L., Jeka, J.J., Horak, F. and Martin, V. (2007) Motor Equivalent Control of the Center of Mass in Response to Support Surface Perturbations. Experimental Brain Research, 180, 163-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0848-1
- Massion, J. (1992) Movement, Posture and Equilibrium: Interaction and Coordination. Progress in Neurobiology, 38, 35-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-0082(92)90034-C
- Bryant, J.T., Wevers, H.W. and Lowe, P.J. (1984) Method of Data Smoothing for Instantaneous Center of Rotation Measurements. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 22, 597-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02443876
- Winter, D.A. (2005) Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. 3rd Edition, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 59-85.
- Winter, D.A., Patla, A.E., Rietdyk, S. and Ishac, M. (2001) Ankle Muscle Stiffness in the Control of Balance during Quiet Standing. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85, 2630-2633.
- Yamasaki, H., Kambara, H. and Koike, Y. (2011) Dynamic Optimization of the Sit-to-Stand Movement. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 27, 306-313.
- Latash, M.L., Scholz, J.P. and Schoner, G. (2002) Motor Control Strategies Revealed in the Structure of Motor Variability. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 30, 26-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003677-200201000-00006
- Rosenbaum, D.A. (2010) Human Motor Control. 2nd Edition, Elsevier Inc., Burlington, 11-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374226-1.00002-4