Auditory change detection studies have shown that a repetition effect occurs when the response-stimulus interval is less than 500 ms. However, this response repetition effect is variable. Forty healthy young subjects were asked to respond to target stimuli pertaining to event-related potentials as quickly and accurately as possible (10% target, inter-stimulus interval: 1500 ms). Reaction time (RT) for the targets was measured with electroencephalography. RT was found to be the fastest for the second instance of repeated targets and targets that appeared after 17 or more successive non-targets (p < 0.001). The longest P3 latencies and smallest P3 amplitudes were observed for the second instance of repeated targets; conversely, the shortest P3 latencies and largest P3 amplitudes were observed for targets that appeared after 17 or more successive non-targets (p < 0.001). All target stimuli were accompanied by a – 0.9 μV baseline negative shift of the frontal scalpelectroencephalography100 ms before the upcoming stimulus, suggesting that SPN was observed after every target stimulus. The non-target stimuli immediately after target were accompanied by MMN. Therefore, we concluded that subjects prioritized instructions pertaining to quicker response than those pertaining to accuracy. That explains RTs of second instance of repeated target are one of the fastest and how mistakes occur for non-target immediately after target stimulus. Negative baseline shifts detected by electroencephalography in this variable task with target and non-target event-related potentials provide key elements in the understanding of auditory responses.
Bertelson, P. (1963) S-R Relationships and Reaction Times to New Versus Repeated Signals in a Serial Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 478-484. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047742
Smith, M.C. (1968) Repetition Effect and Short-Term Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 435-439. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021293
Keele, S.W. (1969) Repetition Effect: A Memory-Dependent Process. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 243-248. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021173
Kirby, N.H. (1976) Sequential Effects in Two-Choice Reaction Time: Automatic Facilitation or Subjective Expectancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 567-577. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.2.4.567
Soetens, E., Boer, L.C. and Hueting, J. (1985) Expectancy or Automatic Facilitation? Separating Sequential Effects in Two-Choice Reaction Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 598-616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.11.5.598
Campbell, K.C. and Proctor, R.W. (1993) Repetition Effects with Categorizable Stimulus and Response Sets. The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1345-1362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1345
Sommer, W., Leuthold, H. and Soetens, E. (1999) Covert Signs of Expectancy in Serial Reaction Time Tasks Revealed by Event-Related Potentials. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 342-353. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206892
Hübner, R. and Druey, M.D. (2006) Response Execution, Selection, or Activation: What Is Sufficient for Response-Related Repetition Effects under task Shifting? Psychological Research, 70, 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0219-8
Baldeweg, T. (2006) Repetition Effects to Sounds: Evidence for Predictive Coding in the Auditory System. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 93-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.010
Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R. and Martin, A. (2006) Repetition and the Brain: Neural Models of Stimulus-Specific Effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006
Remington, R.J. (1968) Analysis of Sequential Effects on Choice Reaction Times. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 250-257. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028122
Schacter, D.L., Dobbins, I.G. and Schnyer, D.M. (2004) Specificity of Priming: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 853-862. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1534
Brunia, C.H.M. (1993) Waiting in Readiness: Gating in Attention and Motor Preparation. Psychophysiology, 30, 327-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02054.x
Brunia, C.H.M. (2003) CNV and SPN: Indices of Anticipatory Behavior. In: Jahanshahi, M. and Hallett, M., Eds., The Bereitschaftspotential, Kluwer/Plenum, New York, 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0189-3_13
Leuthold, H., Sommer, W. and Ulrich, R. (2004) Preparing for Action: Inferences from CNV and LRP. Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.18.23.77
Garrido, M.I., Kilner, J.M., Stephan, K.E. and Friston, K.J. (2009) The Mismatchnegativity: A Review of Underlying Mechanisms. Clinical Neurophysiology, 20, 453-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.029
Haenschel, C., Vernon, D.J., Dwivedi, P., Gruzelier, J.H. and Baldeweg, T. (2005) Event-Related Brain Potential Correlates of Human Auditory Sensory Memory-Trace Formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 10494-10501. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1227-05.2005
Kutas, M., McCarthy, G. and Donchin, E. (1977) Augmenting Mental Chronometry: The p300 as a Measure of Stimulus Evaluation Time. Science, 197, 792-795. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.887923
Ritter, W., Simson, R., Vaughan Jr., H.G. and Friedman, D. (1979) A Brain Event Related to the Making of a Sensory Discrimination. Science, 203, 1358-1361. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.424760
Magliero, A., Bashore, T.R., Coles, M.G.H. and Donchin, E. (1984) On the Dependence of P300 Latency on Stimulus Evaluation Processes. Psychophysiology, 21, 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1984.tb00201.x
Barry, R.J. (2009) Evoked Activity and EEG Phase Resetting in the Genesis of Auditory Go/NoGoERPs. Biological Psychology, 80, 292-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.10.009
Lange, F., Rösler, F. and Röder, B. (2003) Early Processing Stages Are Modulated When Auditory Stimuli Are Presented at an Attended Moment in Time: An Event- Related Potential Study. Psychophysiology, 40, 806-817. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00081
Katayama, J. and Polich, J. (1998) Stimulus Context Determines P3a and P3b. Psychophysiology, 35, 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3510023
Smith, J.C., Smith, E.A., Provost, A.L. and Heathecote, A. (2010) Sequence Effects Support the Conflict Theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo Task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 75, 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.11.002
Duncan-Johnson, C. and Donchin, E. (1977) On Quantifying Surprise: The Variation in Event-Related Potentials with Subjective Probability. Psychophysiology, 14, 456-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1977.tb01312.x
Starr, A., Sandroni, P. and Michalewski, H.J. (1995) Readiness to Respond in a Target Detection Task: Pre- and Post-Stimulus Event-Related Potentials in Normal Subjects. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 96, 76-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(94)00162-E
Starr, A., Aguinaldo, T., Roe, M. and Michalewski, H.J. (1997) Sequential Changes of Auditory Processing during Target Detection: Motor Responding versus Mental Counting. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 105, 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-980X(97)00016-7
Gonsalvez, C.J. and Polich, J. (2002) P300 Amplitude Is Determined by Target-to-Target Interval. Psychophysiology, 39, 388-396. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577201393137
Picton, T.W. (1992) The P300 Wave of the Human Event-Related Potential. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 9, 456-479. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199210000-00002
Matt, J., Leuthold, H. and Sommer, W. (1992) Differential Effects of Voluntary Expectancies on Reaction Times and Event-Related Potentials: Evidence for Automatic and Controlled Expectancies. The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 810-822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.4.810
Gonsalvez, C.J., Gordon, E., Grayson, S., Barry, R.J., Lazzaro, I. and Bahramali, H. (1999) Is the Target-to-Target Interval a Critical Determinant of P3 Amplitude? Psychophysiology, 36, 643-654. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3650643
Verleger, R. (1997) On the Utility of P3 Latency as an Index of Mental Chronometry. Psychophysiology, 34, 131-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02125.x
Desmedt, J.E. and Debecker, J. (1979) Slow Potential Shifts and Decision P350 Interaction in Tasks with Random Sequences of Near-Threshold Clicks and Finger Stimuli Delivered at Regular Intervals. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 47, 671-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(79)90294-3
Sams, M., Alho, K. and Näätänen, R. (1984) Short-Term Habituation and Dishabituation of the Mismatch Negativity of the ERP. Psychophysiology, 21, 434-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1984.tb00223.x
Wacongne, C., Changeux, J.P. and Dehaene, S. (2012) A Neuronal Model of Predictive Coding Accounting for the Mismatch Negativity. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 3665-3678. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5003-11.2012