Left ventricular systolic function assessment in patients with dilated heart failure using cardiovascular magnetic resonance
- 1 School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore
- 2 Department of Cardiology, National Heart Center, Singapore
- 3 School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore
Abstract
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has become a reference standard for the measure-ment of cardiac volumes, function, and mass. This study aims to reconstruct three dimen-sional modeling of the left ventricle (LV) in pa-tients with heart failure (HF) using CMRtools and thereby derive the LV functional indices. CMR images were acquired in 41 subjects (6 females) with heart failure (HF) and 12 normal controls (4 females). Five comparisons were made (i) nor-mal and dilated heart failure subjects, (ii) male and female normal heart, (iii) male and female dilated heart, (iv) male normal and dilated heart failure and (v) female normal and dilated heart failure. In HF, a significant higher values of EDV (320 刡 79 vs. 126 刡 22 ml, P<0.0001), ESV (255 刡 68 vs. 54 刡 12 ml, P<0.00001) and lower values of EF (20 刡 7 vs. 58 刡 5 %) were found compared that of normal control. There were significant difference on LV EDV and ESV between sex in both normal and HF subjects.
- Barry L. Zaret, Moser M, Cohen LS. (1992) Heart book.
- Riemer H.J.A. Slart, , Jeroen J. Bax, Richard M. de Jong, Jaep de Boer, Hildo J. Lamb, Piet H. Mook, Antoon T.M. Willemsen, Willem Vaalburg, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, and Pieter L. Jager, (2004) “Comparison of Gated PET with MRI for Evaluation of Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease” Journal of Nuclear Medicine;45, 2 176-182.
- Daniel S. Berman, Rory Hachamovitch, Leslee J. Shaw, John D. Friedman, Sean W. Hayes, Louise E.J. Thomson, David S. Fieno, Guido Germano, Nathan D. Wong, Xingping Kang, and Alan Ro-zanski. (2006) “Roles of Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiac Computed Tomography, and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Noninvasive Risk Stratification and a Conceptual Framework for the Selection of Noninvasive Imaging Tests in Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine; 47, 1107-1118.
- Kim Rajappan, Lefteris Livieratos, Paolo G. Camici, and Dudley J. Pennell. (2002) “Measurement of Ventricular Volumes and Func-tion: A Comparison of Gated PET and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine; 43, 806-810.
- Tom R. Miller, Jerold W. Wallis, Brian R. Landy, Robert J. Gropler, and Chander L. Sabharwal, (1994) “Measurement of Global and Regional Left Ventricular Function by Cardiac PET” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine; 35, 999-1005.
- Daniel S. Berman, Rory Hachamovitch, Leslee J. Shaw, John D. Friedman, Sean W. Hayes, Louise E.J. Thomson, David S. Fieno, Guido Germano, Piotr Slomka, Nathan D. Wong, Xingping Kang, and Alan Rozanski, (2006) “Roles of Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiac Computed Tomography, and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: As-sessment of Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine; 47, 74-82.
- Zaid Zeidan, Raimund Erbel, Joerg Barkhausen, Peter Hunold, Thomas Bartel, and Thomas Buck, Essen, Germany. (2003) “Analysis of Global Systolic and Diastolic Left Ventricular Per-formance Using Volume-time Curves by Real time Three Dimen-sional Echocardiography”J Am Soc Echiocardiogr;16:29-37.
- Tuncay Hazirolan, Baris Tasbas, Merve Gulbiz Dagoglu, Murat Canyigit, Gulcan Abali, Kudret Aytemir, Ali Oto, Ferhun Balkanci, (2007) “Comparison of short and long axis methods in cardiac MR imaging and echocardiography for left ventricular function” Diagn Interv Radiol; 13, 33-38.
- Wolfgang M. Schaefer, Claudia S.A. Lipke, Dirk Standke, Harald P. Kühl, Bernd Nowak, Hans-Juergen Kaiser, Karl-Christian Koch, and Udalrich Buell. (2005) “Quantification of Left Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction from Gated 99mTc-MIBI SPECT: MRI Validation and Comparison of the Emory Cardiac Tool Box with QGS and 4D-MSPECT” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine; 46, 1256-1263.