The opinion and experience of surgeons with laparoscopic bowel grasper haptics
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Abstract
Background: In order to develop new and better laparoscopic bowel instruments, which reduces patient risks, the opinions and experience that surgeons have with current laparoscopic bowel grasper haptics is important. In this study we explored this by means of a questionnaire. Method: A total of 386 online- questionnaires, were sent to laparoscopic surgeons working in European hospitals. They were all members of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery and perform laparoscopic obesities or bowel surgery. Surgeons where divided into different age and experience groups. Results: A total of 174 completely filled out forms were analyzed. In total, 16% of the surgeons cannot prevent damage when they pinch too hard, although they (10%) might have seen or felt it. Seven percent of the respondents were not able to see or feel tissue slippage. Whereas 31% can see or feel slippage they cannot do anything to prevent it. Overall, most of the respondents would appreciate technical changes in the laparoscopic bowel graspers to reduce tissue damage. Of all the respondents, 79% maintain that it is necessary to have a new laparoscopic grasper with augmented feedback. The majority of the respondents (77%) would like to have tactile feedback as an indication of the level of pinch force. There are not many differences in the opinions of surgeons at different skill levels. Conclusion: From the results of the questionnaire and the other comments made by respondents it is evident that research and developments in the field of new laparoscopic graspers should continue.
- Cuschieri, A. (1995) Whither minimal access surgery: Tribulations and expectations. American Journal of Surgery, 169, 9-19.
- Moreno-Egea, A., Torralba, J., Morales, G., Fernandez, T., Guzman, P., Hita, G., Girela, E., Corral, M., Campillo, A. and Aguayo, J. (2005) Laparoscopic repair of secondary lumbar hernias: Open vs. laparoscopic surgery. A prospective, nonrandomized study. Cirugia Espanola, 77, 159-162.
- Dedemadi, G., Sgourakis, G., Karaliotas, C., Christofides, T., Kouraklis, G. and Karaliotas, C. (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and open tension-free repair of recurrent inguinal hernias: A prospective randomized study. Surgical Endoscopy, 20, 1099-1104.
- Roumm, A., Pizzi, L., Goldfarb, N. and Cohn, H. (2005) Minimally invasive: Minimally reimbursed? An examination of six laparoscopic surgical procedures. Surgical Innovations, 12, 261-287.
- Stefanoni, M., Casciola, L., Ceccarelli, G., Spaziani, A., Conti, D., Bartoli, A., Zitti, L.D., Bellocchi, R. and Valeri, R. (2006) The biliopancreatic diversion. A comparison of laparoscopic and laparotomic techniques. Minerva Chirurgica, 61, 205-213.
- Stassen, H.G., Dankelman, J., Grimbergen, C.A. and Meijer, D.W. (2001) Man-machine aspects of minimally invasive surgery. Annual Reviews in Control, 25, 111-122.
- Dankelman, J., Wentink, M. and Stassen, H.G. and Gouma, D.J. (2003) Human reliability and training in minimally invasive surgery. Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies, 12, 129-135.
- Heijnsdijk, E.A.M., Dankelman, J. and Gouma, D.J. (2002) Effectiveness of grasping and duration of clamping using laparoscopic graspers. Surgical Endoscopy, 16, 1329-1331.
- Westebring-van der Putten, E.P., van den Dobbelsteen, J.J., Goossens, R.H., Jakimowicz, J.J. and Dankelman, J. (2009) Force feedback requirements for efficient laparoscopic grasp control. Ergonomics, 52, 1055-1066.
- Westebring-van der Putten, E.P., Goossens, R.H.M., Jakimowicz, J.J. and Dankelman, J. (2008) Haptics in minimally invasive surgery-a review. Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies, 17, 3-16.
- Widmaier, E.P., Hershel, R. and Strang, K.T. (2004) Vander, Sherman, and Lucano's Human Physiology, The mechanisms of body function, 9th Edition, McGraw-Hill, 207- 266.
- Westebring-van der Putten, E.P., van den Dobbelsteen, J.J., Goossens, R.H.M., Jakimowicz, J.J. and Dankelman, J. (2009) Effect of laparoscopic grasper force transmission ratio on grasp control. Surgical Endoscopy, 23, 818-824.