Gene finding by integrating gene finders
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
Abstract
Gene finding, the accurate annotation of genomic DNA, has become one of the central topics in biological research. Although various computational methods (gene finders) have been proposed and developed, they all have their own limitations in gene findings. In this paper, we introduce an integrating gene finder, which combines the results of several existing gene finders together, to improve the accuracy of gene finding. Four integration schemes, based on majority voting, are developed for the analysis of two datasets – the basic dataset and the testing dataset. The basic dataset consists of 1500 DNA sequences and the testing dataset consists of 103 DNA sequences. It is demonstrated that a simple integration (a simple voting for each nucleotide) can significantly improve the finding performance, and removing confusing gene finders, caused by poor performance or redundant results, is important for a further improvement of the integration. The best prediction results are obtained using weighted majority voting, aided by the mRMR (Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance) (Peng, 2005) method for the gene finder selection. The prediction accuracies are 84.16% and 90.06% for the basic dataset and testing dataset respectively, which are better than any individual gene finding software in our research.
- Kulp, D., Haussler, D., Reese, M.G. and Eeckman, F.H. (1996) A generalized Hidden Markov Model for the recognition of human genes in DNA. Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, 4(2), 134-142.
- Snyder, E. and Stormo, G. (1995) Identification of protein coding regions in genomic DNA. Journal of Molecular Biology, 248, 1-18.
- Borodovsky, M. and McIninch, J.G. (1993) Parallel gene recognition for both DNA strands. Computational Chemistry, 17, 123-133.
- Guigo, R., Knudsen, S., Drake, N. and Smith, T.F. (1992) Prediction of gene structure. Journal of Molecular Biology, 226, 141-157.
- C. Burge, S. Karlin, (1997) Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. Journal of Molecular Biology, 268, 78-94.
- Salamov, A. and Solovyev, V. (2000) Ab initio Gene Finding in Drosophila Genomic DNA. Genome Research, 10, 516-522.
- Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W. and Lipman, D.J. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology, 215, 403-410.
- Korf, I., Flicek, P., Duan, D. and Brent, M.R. (2001) Integrating genomic homology into gene structure prediction. Bioinformatics, 17, S140-S148.
- Condorcet, N.C. (1785) Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des decisions rendues à la pluralité des voix. Imprimerie Royale, Paris.
- Huang, Y.S. and Suen, C.Y. (1995) A method of combining multiple experts for the recognition of unconstrained handwritten numerals. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17, 90-94.
- Lam, L., Huang, Y.S. and Suen, S.Y. (1997) Combination of multiple classifier decisions for optical character recognition. In: Bunke, H. and Wang, P.S.P., Eds., Handbook of Character Recognition and Document Image Analysis, World Scientific Publishing Company, New Jersey, 79-101.
- Suen, C.Y., Nadal, C., Mai, T.A., Legault, R. and Lam, L. (1990) Recognition of totally unconstrained handwritten numerals based on the concept of multiple experts. Proceedings of IWFHR, Montreal, 131-143.
- Stajniak, A., Szostakowski J. and Skoneczny, S. (1997) Mixed neural-traditional classifier for character recognition. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2949, 102-110.
- Rahman, A.F.R., Alam, H. and Fairhurst, M.C. (2002) Multiple classifier combination for character recognition: Revisiting the majority voting system and its variation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2324, 167-178.