Delineation of Biological Tumor Volume from Positron Emission Tomography Images in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- 1 The Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
- 2 The Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- 3 The Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- 4 The Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- 5 The Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, China
- 6 The Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
Abstract
Objective: To develop an auto-segmentation method for delineating the biological tumor volume of nasopharyngeal carcinoma from positron emission tomography images. Methods: A phantom consisting of a water tank with fixed background fluorodeoxyglucose [18F-FDG] activity and spheres with diameters ranging from 2.1 to 5 cm with varying activities of FDG were used to simulate tumors of different sizes and FDG uptake. The phantom was scanned with a PET/CT scan at different sphere to background intensity ratios. An optimum fixed percentage threshold (FT) approach and a signal-to-background ratio (SBR) approach were developed to estimate the true size of the spheres from the PET images. Both approaches were further evaluated in patient images for validation. Twenty-two patients with NPC from stage T1 to T4 were included. The PET based biological tumor volumes (BTV) were delineated with both FT (BTV FT ) and SBR (BTV SBR ) approaches and compared with the gross tumor volume localized from MRI (GTV MR ). The mean volumes of BTV FT and BTV SBR were compared and the degree of overlap between GTV MR and both BTVs was evaluated. Paired t-tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: The optimal FT value was 36.5% of maximal intensity, and SBR approach was represented by an inverse linear regression model. The estimated volume of spheres segmented by both approaches shows no significant difference from the true volume of spheres ( p > 0.05), but the average absolute errors were smaller from SBR approach than FT approach ( p = 0.008). GTV MR was larger than both BTV FT ( p = 0.003) and BTV SBR ( p < 0.009). The overlapping volume of BTV SBR with GTV MR is significantly larger than with BTV FT (0.52 and 0.42 respectively, p < 0.0005). Conclusions: SBR approach is more feasible than FT approach to localize the BTV of NPC from FDG-PET image, and BTV might help to modify the extent of GTV MR for radiotherapy planning purpose.
- Zaidi, H. and El Naqa, I. (2010) PET-Guided Delineation of Radiation Therapy Treatment Volumes: A Survey of Image Segmentation Techniques. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Molecular Imaging, 37, 2165-2187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1423-3
- Daisne, J.F., Duprez, T., Weynand, B., Lonneux, M., Hamoir, M., Reychler, H., et al. (2004) Tumor Volume in Pharyngolaryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Comparison at CT, MR Imaging, and FDG PET and Validation with Surgical Specimen1. Radiology, 233, 93-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2331030660
- Wang, D., Schultz, C. J., Jursinic, P. A., Bialkowski, M., Zhu, X. R., Brown, W. D., et al. (2006) Initial Experience of FDG-PET/CT Guided IMRT of Head-And-Neck Carcinoma. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology* Physics, 65, 143-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.048
- Burri, R.J., Rangaswamy, B., Kostakoglu, L., Hoch, B., Genden, E.M., Som, P.M., et al. (2008) Correlation of Positron Emission Tomography Standard Uptake Value and Pathologic Specimen Size in Cancer of the Head and Neck. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 71, 682-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.055
- Schinagl, D.A.X., Vogel, W.V., Hoffmann, A.L., van Dalen, J.A., Oyen, W.J. and Kaanders, J.H. (2007) Comparison of Five Segmentation Tools for 18F-Fluoro-Deoxy-Glucose-Positron Emission Tomography-Based Target Volume Definition in Head and Neck Cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 69, 1282-1289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2333
- Greco, C., Nehmeh, S.A., Schoder, H., Gonen, M., Raphael, B., Stambuk, H.E., et al. (2008) Evaluation of Different Methods of 18F-FDG-PET Target Volume Delineation in the Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31, 439-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/COC.0b013e318168ef82
- MacManus, M., Nestle, U., Rosenzweig, K.E., Carrio, I., Messa, C., Belohlavek, O., et al. (2009) Use of PET and PET/CT for Radiation Therapy Planning: IAEA Expert Report 2006-2007. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 91, 85-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.11.008
- Ford, E.C., Herman, J., Yorke, E. and Wahl, R.L. (2009) 18F-FDG PET/CT for Image-Guided and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 50, 1655-1665. http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.055780
- Soret, M., Bacharach, S.L. and Buvat, I. (2007) Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 48, 932-945. http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.106.035774