Sensitive Skin in China
- 1 The Procter & Gamble Company, Winton Hill Business Center, Cincinnati, USA
- 2 The Procter & Gamble Company, Schwalbach, Germany
- 3 San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, Rome, Italy
- 4 Department of Dermatology University of San Francisco, Medical School, San Francisco, USA
Abstract
Background: Many consumers in the USA and Europe define themselves as having sensitive skin, a phenomenon whose etiology appears to include both physiological and psychosocial factors. Objectives: Sensitive skin data from the developing world is sparse. This study evaluates the prevalence and characteristics of sensitive skin in China and compares data collected to existing data from the western world. Patients/Materials/Methods: A total of 408 Chinese women voluntarily completed a survey on sensitive skin. Results: Some degree of skin sensitivity was claimed by 94 (23%) of respondents; most (90.4%) said their skin was only slightly or moderately sensitive. Facial sensitivity was claimed by 21% of Chinese women, sensitivity of the body surface by 9% and genital sensitivity by only 6%. Small numbers of respondents reported a history of skin allergy (3%) or a familial history of sensitive skin (2%). Many reported making buying decisions based on product claims. Conclusions: Only 23% of Chinese women claimed any degree of sensitive skin, a prevalence substantially lower than that observed in most Western countries. Sensitivity of the genital skin, in particular, was dramatically lower, suggesting at least some cultural component to perceptions of sensitive skin.
- M. A. Farage, “How Do Perceptions of Sensitive Skin Differ at Different Anatomical Sites? An Epidemiological Study,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, Vol. 38, No. 8, 2009, pp. e521-e530. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03487.xU
- L. Misery, E. Myon, N. Martin, S. Consoli, T. Nocera and C. Taieb. “Sensitive Skin: Epidemiological Approach and Impact on Quality of Life in France,” In: E. Berardesca, J. W. Fluhr and H. I. Maibach, Eds., Sensitive Skin Syndrome, Taylor & Francis, New York, 2006, pp. 181-191.
- L. Misery, S. Boussetta, T. Nocera, N. Perez-Cullell and C. Taieb, “Sensitive Skin in Europe,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2009, pp. 376-381. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.03037.xU
- C. M. Willis, S. Shaw, O. De Lacharrière, M. Baverel, L. Reiche, R. Jourdain, P. Bastien and J. D. Wilkinson, “Sensitive Skin: An Epidemiological Study,” The British Journal of Dermatology, Vol. 145, No. 2, 2001, pp. 258-263. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04343.xU
- L. Misery, E. Myon, N. Martin, S. Consoli, S. Boussetta, T. Nocera and C. Taieb, “Sensitive Skin: Psychological Effects and Seasonal Changes,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2007, pp. 620-628.
- H. Loffler, “Contact Allergy and Sensitive Skin,” In: E. Berardesca, J. Fluhr and H. Maibach, Eds., Sensitive Skin Syndrome, Taylor and Francis, New York, 2006, pp. 225-235.
- M. A. Farage, K. W. Miller, P. Elsner and H. I. Maibach, “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors in Skin Ageing: A Review,” International Journal of Cosmetic Science, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2008, pp. 87-95. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2494.2007.00415.xU
- B. G. Green, “Measurement of Sensory Irritation of the Skin,” American Journal of Contact Dermatitis, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2000, pp. 170-180. doi:10.1053/ajcd.2000.7185U
- M. B. Britz and H. I. Maibach, “Human Cutaneous Vulvar Reactivity to Irritants,” Contact Dermatitis, Vol. 5, No. 6, 1979, pp. 375-377. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1979.tb04908.xU
- P. Elsner, D. Wilhelm and H. I. Maibach, “Sodium Lauryl Sulfate-Induced Irritant Contact Dermatitis in Vulvar and Forearm Skin of Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1990, pp. 648-652.
- M. A. Farage, “Does Sensitive Skin Differ between Men and Women?” Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2010, pp. 153-163. doi:10.3109/15569521003774990U