Evaluation of Rheometry Amplitude Sweep Cross-Over Point as an Index of Flexibility for HA Fillers
- 1 Galderma, Uppsala, Sweden
Abstract
Background : The majority of studies published on rheology of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers have focused on results from frequency sweeps within the linear viscoelastic region (LVR), i.e. at nearly static conditions. To study the properties and behavior of HA fillers at more dynamic conditions, it is necessary to go outside the LVR. Objective : Evaluation of the G’/G’’ cross-over point from the amplitude sweep is suggested as a manner to estimate the flexibility of HA fillers. Materials and methods : Rheological properties of 7 HA fillers were measured in an amplitude sweep from 0.1 % to 10000% strain at 1 Hz, using an Anton Paar MCR 301, a PP-25 measuring system with a gap of 1 mm at 25 ℃ and a 30-min relaxation time. The cross-over point was evaluated for stress, strain and G (G’ and G’’ identical), the values denoted xStrain, xStress and xG. Results : The xStrain values spanned from below 1000 % to above 2000% for the products based on the Optimal Balance Technology (OBT) ? (in the US, XpresHAn Technology ? ), compared to below 100% for the products based on the NASHA ? technology. Conclusions : Measurement of the flexibility provides a more complete picture of the rheological properties of HA fillers as a complement to firmness measured as G’. The test results show that the Restylane family of products covers a large range in flexibility, and that the flexibility can be estimated using xStrain derived from the amplitude sweep.
- Pierre, S., Liew, S. and Bernardin, A. (2015) Basics of Dermal Filler Rheology. Dermatologic Surgery, 41, S120-126. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000334
- Falcone, S.J., Doerfler, A.M. and Berg, R.A. (2007) Novel Synthetic Dermal Fillers Based on Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose: Comparison with Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid-Based Dermal Fillers. Dermatologic Surgery, 33, S136-143. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042728-200712001-00005
- Falcone, S.J. and Berg, R.A. (2008) Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers: A Comparison of Rheological Properties. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A, 87, 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31675
- Kablik, J., Monheit, G.D., Yu, L., Chang, G. and Gershkovich, J. (2009) Comparative Physical Properties of Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers. Dermatologic Surgery, 35, 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.01046.x
- Sundaram, H., Voigts, B., Beer, K. and Meland, M. (2010) Comparison of the Rheological Properties of Viscosity and Elasticity in Two Categories of Soft Tissue Fillers: Calcium Hydroxylapatite and Hyaluronic Acid. Dermatologic Surgery, 36, 1859-1865. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01743.x
- La Gatta, A., Schiraldi, C., Papa, A. and De Rosa, M. (2011) Comparative Analysis of Commercial Dermal Fillers Based on Crosslinked Hyaluronan: Physical Characterization and in Vitro Enzymatic Degradation. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 96, 630-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.12.025
- Stocks, D., Sundaram, H., Michaels, J., Durrani, M.J., Wortzman, M.S. and Nelson, D.B. (2011) Rheological Evaluation of the Physical Properties of Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, 10, 974-980.
- Sundaram, H. and Cassuto, D. (2013) Biophysical Characteristics of Hyaluronic Acid Soft-Tissue Fillers and Their Relevance to Aesthetic Applications. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 132, 5S-21S.
- Edsman, K.L., WiebensjÖ, Å.M., Risberg, A.M. and Öhrlund, J.Å. (2015) Is There a Method That Can Measure Cohesivity? Cohesion by Sensory Evaluation Compared with Other Test Methods. Dermatologic Surgery, 41, S365-372. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000550
- Hee, C.K., Shumate, G.T., Narurkar, V., Bernardin, A. and Messina, D.J. (2015) Rheological Properties and in Vivo Performance Characteristics of Soft Tissue Fillers. Dermatologic Surgery, 41, S373-381. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000536