Consumer Panel Size in Sensory Cosmetic Product Evaluation: A Pilot Study from a Statistical Point of View
- 1 Research & Development and Regulatory Affairs, Kneipp GmbH, Würzburg, Germany
- 2 Statistik & Beratung Daniela Keller, Kürnach, Germany
- 3 Research & Development and Regulatory Affairs, Kneipp GmbH, Würzburg, Germany
- 4 Research & Development and Regulatory Affairs, Kneipp GmbH, Würzburg, Germany
- 5 Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrück, Germany
- 6 Research & Development and Regulatory Affairs, Kneipp GmbH, Würzburg, Germany
Abstract
Subjective evaluations are nowadays applied more commonly in cosmetic product assessment. They are used in quality control, product development steps and efficacy studies for claim support. Several studies have been published to determine the adequate number of panelists, but recommendations and guidelines dealing with this topic are rare in the cosmetic sector. The aim of the present pilot study was to recommend a suitable study plan and define the adequate consumer panel size for cosmetic consumer assessment. A questionnaire-based product evaluation study, with three different cosmetic products, was organized as a consumer test using a seven-point scale. As a last step, a specific statistical calculation was performed to define the minimum sample size. It showed that the minimum sample size, besides the obvious statistical parameters of standard deviation and confidence interval, also depends on age and gender of the panelists and product assessment item. Utilizing a CI of 95% a minimum of 60 panelists seems to be sufficient for home-use-test (HUT) with a given seven-point scale. A minimum of 101 panelists are shown to be sufficient utilizing a CI of 99%.
- Meilgaard, M.C., Civille, G.V. and Carv, B.T. (1999) Sensory Evaluation Techniques. 4th Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439832271
- Nobile, V. (2016) Guidelines on Cosmetic Efficacy Testing on Humans. Ethical, Technical, and Regulatory Requirements in the Main Cosmetics Markets. Journal of Cosmetology & Trichology, 2, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-9323.1000107
- Mead, R. and Gay, C. (1995) Sequential Design of Sensory Trials. Food Quality and Preference, 6, 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-3293(95)00029-1
- Moussaoui, K.A. and Varela, P. (2010) Exploring Consumer Product Profiling Techniques and Their Linkage to a Quantitative Descriptive Analysis. Food Quality and Preference, 21, 1088-1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.09.005
- Moskowitz, H.R. (1996) Base Size in Product Testing: A Psychophysical Viewpoint and Analysis. Food Quality and Preference, 8, 247-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(97)00003-7
- Lawless, H.T. and Heymann, H. (2010) Sensory Evaluation of Food. Principles and Practices. 2nd Edition, Springer Verlag, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6488-5
- Stone, H., Sidel, J.L. and Taylor, S. (1993) Sensory Evaluation Practice. 2nd Edition, Academic Press, New York.
- Scriven, F. (2005) Issues and Viewpoints—Two Types of Sensory Panels or Are There More? Journal of Sensory Studies, 20, 526-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2005.00044.x
- Lodén, M. (2000) Efficacy Testing of Cosmetics and Other Topical Products. IFSCC Magazine, 3, 47-64.
- Hough, G., Wakeling, I., Mucci, A., Chambers IV, E., Gallardo, I.M. and Alves, L.R. (2006) Number of Consumers Necessary for Sensory Acceptability Tests. Food Quality and Preference, 17, 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.07.002
- Vidal, L., Cadena, R.S., Antùnez, L., Giménez, A., Varela, P. and Ares, G. (2014) Stability of Sample Configurations from Projective Mapping: How Many Consumers Are Necessary? Food Quality and Preference, 34, 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.12.006
- Valentin, D., Chollet, S., Lelièvre, M. and Abdi, H. (2012) Quick and Dirty but Still Pretty Good: A Review of New Descriptive Methods in Food Science. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 47, 1563-1578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.03022.x
- Gacula, M.C. and Singh, J. (1984) Statistical Methods in Food and Consumer Research. Academic Press, Orlando.