Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery versus Primary Surgery in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Outcomes at National Institute of Cancer Research Hospital in Bangladesh — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery versus Primary Surgery in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Outcomes at National Institute of Cancer Research Hospital in Bangladesh
Gynaecological Oncology Department, National Institute of Cancer Research & Hospital (NICRH), Dhaka, Bangladesh
,
Gynaecological Oncology Department, National Institute of Cancer Research & Hospital (NICRH), Dhaka, Bangladesh
,
Neurology Department, SShMC, Dhaka, Bangladesh
,
Cancer Epidemiology, NICRH, Dhaka, Bangladesh
,
Harvard Medical School, Division Gynecologic Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
1 Gynaecological Oncology Department, National Institute of Cancer Research & Hospital (NICRH), Dhaka, Bangladesh
2 Gynaecological Oncology Department, National Institute of Cancer Research & Hospital (NICRH), Dhaka, Bangladesh
3 Neurology Department, SShMC, Dhaka, Bangladesh
4 Cancer Epidemiology, NICRH, Dhaka, Bangladesh
5 Harvard Medical School, Division Gynecologic Oncology Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
Introduction: This study evaluated the difference in operative and clinica l outc omes for patients with advanced ovarian cancer after primary debulking surgery (PDS) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debul king surgery (IDS) in Bangladesh. Methods: Sixty patients with a dvanced epit helial ovarian cancer presenting to the department of Gynaecologi cal Oncology at the National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital were prospectively enrolled. Thirty patients underwent primary debulking surgery and thirty patients received NACT followed by IDS. Results: In the PDS and IDS groups respectively, 56.7% and 50% of patients presented with stage IIIC and 67.7% and 56.7% respectively had ser i ous papillary type histopathology. Duration of surgery, amount of blood loss and total hospital stay were significantly lower (p < 0.001) in IDS group than in the PDS group. There was a statistically significant difference in postoperative tumor residuals between IDS and PDS patients. Complete tumor resection (R0) was obtained in 24 (80%) of IDS patients versus 13 (43.3%) PDS patients. In fifteen months of follow-up, 21 (70%) in the PDS group and 5 (16.7%) in the IDS group recurred ( p = 0.021). Median progression free survival in PDS patients was twelve months while that of the IDS group was seventeen months. There was one death at 45 days in the PDS group. No other deaths were documented at fifteen months of follow-up. Conclusion : Interval debulking surgery has a more favorable outcome than primary debulking surgery on progression free survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients and permits a less aggressive surgery to be performed in Bangladesh.
Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Fuchs, H.E. and Jemal, A. (2021) Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 7-33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654
Minig, L., Zorrero, C., Iserte, P.P. and Poveda, A. (2015) Selecting the Best Strategy of Treatment in Newly Diagnosed Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer Patients. World Journal of Methodology, 5, 196-202. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v5.i4.196
Allen, D.G., Heintz, A.P. and Touw, F.W. (1995) A Meta-Analysis of Residual Disease and Survival in Stage III and IV Carcinoma of the ovary. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 16, 349-356.
Bristow, R.E., Tomacruz, R.S., Armstrong, D.K., Trimble, E.L. and Montz, F.J. (2002) Survival Effect of Maximal Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma during the Platinum Era: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20, 1248-1259. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.20.5.1248
Coleridge, S.L., Bryant, A., Kehoe, S. and Morrison, J. (2021) Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy before Surgery versus Surgery Followed by Chemotherapy for Initial Treatment in Advanced Ovarian Epithelial Cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 7, Article No. CD005343. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub6
Xu, Z., Becerra, A.Z., Justiniano, C.F., Aquina, C.T., Fleming, F.J., Boscoe, F.P., et al. (2020) Complications and Survivorship Trends after Primary Debulking Surgery for Ovarian Cancer. Journal of Surgical Research, 246, 34-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.08.027
Markauskas, A., Mogensen, O., de Pont Christensen, R. and Jensen, P.T. (2014) Primary Surgery or Interval Debulking for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Does It Matter? International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 24, 1420-1428. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000241
Wright, A.A., Bohlke, K., Armstrong, D.K., Bookman, M.A., Cliby, W.A., Coleman, R.L., et al. (2016) Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34, 3460-3473. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30566-7
Vergote, I., Coens, C., Nankivell, M., Kristensen, G.B., Parmar, M.K.B., Ehlen, T., et al. (2018) Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy versus Debulking Surgery in Advanced Tubo-Ovarian Cancers: Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data from the EORTC 55971 and CHORUS Trials. The Lancet Oncology, 19, 1680-1687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30566-7
Patel, A., Iyer, P., Matsuzaki, S., Matsuo, K., Sood, A.K. and Fleming, N.D. (2021) Emerging Trends in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer. Cancers, 13, Article No. 626. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040626
Clarke, T., Galaal, K., Bryant, A. and Naik, R. (2014) Evaluation of Follow-up Strategies for Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Following Completion of Primary Treatment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 9, Article No. CD006119. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006119.pub3
Maheshwari, A., Kumar, N., Gupta, S., Rekhi, B., Shylasree, T.S., Dusane, R., et al. (2018) Outcomes of Advanced Epithelial Ovarin Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Indian Journal of Cancer, 55, 5054. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.IJC_468_17
Fagotti, A., Ferrandina, G., Vizzielli, G., Fanfani, F., Gallotta, V., Chiantera, V., et al. (2016) Phase III Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Primary Surgery versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer with High Tumour Load (SCORPION Trial): Final Analysis of Peri-Operative Outcome. European Journal of Cancer, 59, 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.01.017
Sehouli, J., Savvatis, K., Braicu, E.I., Schmidt, S.C., Lichtenegger, W. and Fotopoulou, C. (2010) Primary versus Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Results from a Systematic Single-Center Analysis. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 20, 1331-1340.
Zheng, H. and Gao, Y.N. (2012) Primary Debulking Surgery or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy followed by Interval Debulking Surgery for Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer. Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 24, 304-309.
Revaux, A., Rouzier, R., Ballester, M., Selle, F., Daraï, E. and Chéreau, E. (2012) Comparison of Morbidity and Survival between Primary and Interval Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients after Modified Posterior Pelvic Exenteration for Advanced Ovarian Cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 22, 1349-1354. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e318265d358
Kuhn, W., Rutke, S., Späthe, K., Schmalfeldt, B., Florack, G., von Hundelshausen, B., et al. (2001) Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Tumor Debulking Prolongs Survival for Patients with Poor Prognosis in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIIC Ovarian Carcinoma. Cancer, 92, 2585-2591.
Chishti, U. and Aziz, A.B. (2015) Primary Debulking Surgery versus Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage III/IV Ovarian Cancer: Comparison of Perioperative Morbidity and Survival Data in Pakistani Women. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, 65, 306-309.
Chern, J.Y. and Curtin, J.P. (2016) Appropriate Recommendations for Surgical Debulking in Stage IV Ovarian Cancer. Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 17, Article No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-015-0380-2
Eisenkop, S.M., Spirtos, N.M., Friedman, R.L., Lin, W.C., Pisani, A.L. and Perticucci, S. (2003) Relative Influences of Tumor Volume before Surgery and the Cytoreductive Outcome on Survival for Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Prospective Study. Gynecologic Oncology, 90, 390-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00278-6
Onda, T., Satoh, T., Saito, T., Kasamatsu, T., Nakanishi, T., Nakamura, K., et al. (2016) Comparison of Treatment Invasiveness between Upfront Debulking Surgery versus Interval Debulking Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III/IV Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Cancers in a Phase III Randomised Trial: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0602. European Journal of Cancer, 64, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.05.017
Ma, D.-Y., , Tan, B.-X., Li, X.-F., Zhou Y.-Q. and Cai, H.-W. (2013) A Meta-Analysis: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy versus Primary Surgery in Ovarian Carcinoma FIGO Stage III and IV. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 11, Article No. 267. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-267
Morrison, J., Haldar, K., Kehoe, S. and Lawrie, T.A. (2012) Chemotherapy versus Surgery for Initial Treatment in Advanced Ovarian Epithelial Cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 8, Article No. CD005343. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub3
Hegazy, M.A., Hegazi, R.A., Elshafei, M.A., Setit, A.E., Elshamy, M.R., Eltatoongy, M. and Halim, A.A. (2005) Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy versus Primary Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 3, Article No. 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-3-57
Petrillo, M., Ferrandina, G., Fagotti, A., Vizzielli, G., Margariti, P.A., Pedone, A.L., Nero, C., Fanfani, F. and Scambia, G. (2013) Timing and Pattern of Recurrence in Ovarian Cancer Patients with High Tumor Dissemination Treated with Primary Debulking Surgery versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 20, 3955-3960. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3091-6
Vergote, I., Tropé, C.G., Amant, F., Kristensen, G.B., Ehlen, T., Johnson, N., et al. (2010) Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Primary Surgery in Stage IIIC or IV Ovarian Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine, 363, 943-953. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0908806
Kehoe, S., Hook, J., Nankivell, M., Jayson, G.C., Kitchener, H., Lopes, T., et al. (2015) Primary chemoTherapy versus Primary surgery for Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer (CHORUS): An Open-Label, Randomised, Controlled, Non-Inferiority Trial. Lancet, 386, 249-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62223-6
Qin, M., Jin, Y., Ma, L., Zhang, Y.Y. and Pan, L.Y. (2017) The Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies. Oncotarget, 9, 8614-8628. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23808
Ba, M., Long, H., Zhang, X., Yan, Z., Wang, S., Wu, Y., Gong, Y. and Cui, S. (2019) Ascites Do Not Affect the Rate of Complete Cytoreductive Surgery and Prognosis in Patients with Primary Ovarian Cancer with Ascites Treated with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Oncology Letters, 18, 2025-2033. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10493
Berek, J.S., Kehoe, S.T., Kumar, L. and Friedlander, M. (2018) Cancer of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneum. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 143, 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12614