Palbociclib in First-Line vs Second-Line Treatment for HR+/HER2− Metastatic Breast Cancer: Real-World Evidence from a Moroccan Cohort
- 1 Department of Medical Oncology, Hassan II University Hospital, Fez, Morocco
- 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Hassan II University Hospital, Fez, Morocco
- 3 Department of Medical Oncology, Hassan II University Hospital, Fez, Morocco
- 4 Department of Medical Oncology, Hassan II University Hospital, Fez, Morocco
- 5 Department of Medical Oncology, Hassan II University Hospital, Fez, Morocco
- 6 Department of Medical Oncology, Hassan II University Hospital, Fez, Morocco
- 7 Department of Medical Oncology, Hassan II University Hospital, Fez, Morocco
- 8 Department of Medical Oncology, Hassan II University Hospital, Fez, Morocco
- 9 Department of Medical Oncology, Hassan II University Hospital, Fez, Morocco
- 10 Department of Medical Oncology, Hassan II University Hospital, Fez, Morocco
- 11 Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Dental Medicine of Fez, University of Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Fez, Morocco
Abstract
Introduction: Palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, has significantly improved outcomes in patients with HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer. While its efficacy has been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials, real-world comparative data between first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) use remain limited. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 55 patients treated with palbociclib between January 2020 and June 2024. Patients were classified into a first-line group (n = 30; palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitor) and a second-line group (n = 25; palbociclib plus fulvestrant). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: The mean age was 52.4 years. Median PFS was significantly longer in the first-line group compared with the second-line group (19 vs. 8 months; p < 0.001). Overall survival was also superior in the first-line group (36.8 vs. 25.5 months; p = 0.001). The objective response rate was higher in first-line treatment (39% vs. 22%; p = 0.03). The safety profile was acceptable and consistent with previously published clinical trials and real-world data. Conclusion: This real-world study supports the superiority of palbociclib when used in the first-line setting, reinforcing the benefit of early CDK4/6 inhibitor integration in the treatment sequence.
- Cardoso, F., Paluch-Shimon, S., Senkus, E., Curigliano, G., Aapro, M.S., André, F., et al . (2020) 5th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 5). Annals of Oncology , 31, 1623-1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.010
- Sherr, C.J., Beach, D. and Shapiro, G.I. (2016) Targeting CDK4 and CDK6: From Discovery to Therapy. Cancer Discovery , 6, 353-367. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.cd-15-0894
- Dickson, M.A. (2014) Molecular Pathways: CDK4 Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy. Clin ical Cancer Research , 20, 3379-3383. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-1551
- Spring, L.M., Wander, S.A., Andre, F., Moy, B., Turner, N.C. and Bardia, A. (2020) Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 and 6 Inhibitors for Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Past, Present, and Future. The Lancet , 395, 817-827. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30165-3
- Finn, R.S., Martin, M., Rugo, H.S., Jones, S., Im, S., Gelmon, K., et al . (2016) Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine , 375, 1925-1936. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1607303
- Cristofanilli, M., Turner, N.C., Bondarenko, I., Ro, J., Im, S., Masuda, N., et al . (2016) Fulvestrant plus Palbociclib versus Fulvestrant plus Placebo for Treatment of Hormone-Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer That Progressed on Previous Endocrine Therapy (PALOMA-3): Final Analysis of the Multicentre, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Randomised Controlled Trial. The Lancet Oncology , 17, 425-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00613-0
- Messina, C., Cattrini, C., Buzzatti, G., et al . (2018) CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Cancer , 95, 33-44.
- Sherman, R.E., Anderson, S.A., Dal Pan, G.J., Gray, G.W., Gross, T., Hunter, N.L., et al . (2016) Real-World Evidence—What Is It and What Can It Tell Us? New England Journal of Medicine , 375, 2293-2297. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsb1609216
- Eisenhauer, E.A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L.H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., et al . (2009) New Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours: Revised RECIST Guideline (Version 1.1). European Journal of Cancer , 45, 228-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
- National Cancer Institute (2017) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
- Rugo, H.S., Finn, R.S., Dieras, V., et al . (2019) Palbociclib Plus Endocrine Therapy in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment , 176, 539-546.