Comparison of 4-Weekly vs 3-Weekly Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Curative Resection for Biliary Tract Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
Abstract
Background: Surgery for biliary tract cancer, including pancreatoduodenectomy and major hepatectomy, is too aggressive and does not allow postoperative gemcitabine to be administered by the usual dosage protocol. We hypothesized that the feasibility of 3-weekly protocol (days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks) of adjuvant gemcitabine therapy may be superior to the usual 4-weekly protocol (days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks). Method: We compared the outcomes of 6 cycles of the 4-weekly protocol and 9 cycles of the 3-weekly protocol in a prospective randomized setting. The primary endpoint was the completion rate, and the secondary endpoints were the adverse events and the recurrence-free survival rate. Results: Totally, 27 patients were enrolled. The protocol could be completed without any omittances and/or dose modifications in two patients (14%) of the 4-weekly protocol, and three patients (23%) of the 3-weekly protocol (p = 0.8099); grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in almost all the remaining (70%) patients. The relative dose intensity was 72% in the 4-weekly protocol and 78% in the 3-weekly protocol. There was no significant difference in the recurrence-free survival rate. Conclusion: The 3-weekly protocol did not yield superior completion, adverse events or recurrence-free survival rates as compared to the 4-week protocol. Trial Registration: UMIN-CTR, UMIN000001020.
- National Cancer Center, “Cancer Statistics in Japan,” 2005. http://www.ncc.go.jp/en/statistics/index.html
- C. M. Haskelled, “Cancer Treatment,” 5th Edition, WBS-aunders Co., Philadelphia, 2001.
- B. Levin, “Gallbladder Carcinoma,” Annals of Oncology, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1999, pp. 129-130. doi:10.1023/A:1008325911628
- S. Kobayashi, H. Nagano, S. Marubashi, Y. Takeda, M. Tanemura, K. Konishi, Y. Yoshioka, T. Inoue, Y. Doki and M. Mori, “Impact of Postoperative Irradiation after Non-Curative Resection of Hilar Biliary Cancer,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 100, No. 8, 2009, pp. 657-662. doi:10.1002/jso.21409
- S. Kobayashi, H. Nagano, S. Marubashi, H. Wada, H. Eguchi, Y. Takeda, M. Tanemura, Y. Doki and M. Mori, “Multi-Detector Computed Tomography for Preoperative Prediction of Postsurgical Prognosis of Patients with Extrahepatic Biliary Cancer,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 101, No. 5, 2010, pp. 376-383.
- S. Kobayashi, H. Nagano, S. Marubashi, H. Wada, H. Eguchi, Y. Takeda, M. Tanemura, K. Umeshita, Y. Doki and M. Mori, “Treatment of Borderline Cases for Curative Resection of Biliary Tract Cancer,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, In Press.
- S. Miyakawa, S. Ishihara, A. Horiguchi, T. Takada, M. Miyazaki and T. Nagakawa, “Biliary Tract Cancer Treatment: 5584 Results from the Biliary Tract Cancer Statistics Registry from 1998 to 2004 in Japan,” Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1-7. doi:10.1007/s00534-008-0015-0
- J. Furuse, T. Takada, M. Miyazaki, S. Miyakawa, K. Tsukada, M. Nagino, S. Kondo, H. Saito, T. Tsuyuguchi, K. Hirata, F. Kimura, H. Yoshitomi, S. Nozawa, M. Yoshida, K. Wada, H. Amano and F. Miura, “Japanese Association of Biliary Surgery; Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery; Japan Society of Clinical Oncology. Guidelines for chemotherapy of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas,” Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2008, pp. 55-62. doi:10.1007/s00534-007-1280-z
- F. Eckel and R. M. Schmid, “Chemotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma: A Pooled Analysis of Clinical Trials,” British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 96, No. 6, 2007, pp. 896-902. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603648
- N. Yonemoto, J. Furuse, T. Okusaka, K. Yamao, A. Funakoshi, S. Ohkawa, N. Boku, K. Tanaka, M. Nagase, H. Saisho and T Sato, “A Multi-Center Retrospective Analysis of Survival Benefits of Chemotherapy for Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer,” Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 37, No. 11, 2007, pp. 843-851. doi:10.1093/jjco/hym116