Topotecan Use for Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer at Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA)
- 1 Instituto Nacional do Cancer, Hospital do Cancer II, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil
- 2 Instituto Nacional do Cancer, Hospital do Cancer II, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil
- 3 Instituto Nacional do Cancer, Hospital do Cancer II, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil
- 4 Instituto Nacional do Cancer, Hospital do Cancer II, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil
- 5 Instituto Nacional do Cancer, Hospital do Cancer II, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil
- 6 Instituto Nacional do Cancer, Hospital do Cancer II, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil
- 7 Instituto Nacional do Cancer, Hospital do Cancer II, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil
Abstract
Objective: Cervical cancer represents the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and is an important cause of death for women suffering with malignancies. Patients who are refractory or progressed after first-line palliative treatment have a dismal prognosis and no second-line chemotherapy is considered standard so far. Several agents have been investigated in this setting and topotecan is one of the most characterized. The objective of this study wa s to evaluate response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity of topotecan in second palliative line for cer vical cancer. Methods: An analysis was performed of all patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer treated with topotecan in second palliative line at Brazilian National Cancer Institute, between 2008 and 2010. Results: A total of 73 courses of topotecan were given in the current study (median: 3.5 cycles; range 1 - 6). Anemia was the most fre quent adverse event (grade 2:35%; grade 3:30%). Of the 20 patients evaluable, there were 2 partial responders to the treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) was 10%; 3 patients (15%) had stable disease as maximum response. The median PFS for the entire group was 2.93 months (95% CI 2.41 - 3.45) and OS was 4.66 months (95% CI 1.21 - 8.11). Conclusion: The limited activity of topotecan schemas in second-line treatment of cervical cancer and the associated overall toxicity may not justify their use in this setting. Patients who progress after first-line treatment may be offered participation in clinical trials, other second-line agents or best supportive care measures.
- [1] J. Ferlay, H. R. Shin, F. Bray, D. Forman, C. Mathers and D. M. Parkinm “GLOBOCAN 2008 v2.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 10,” International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 2010. http://globocan.iarc.fr
- J. Coronel, L. Cetina, M. Candelaria, A. González-Fierro, D. Arias, D. Cantu, et al., “Weekly Topotecan as Secondor Third-Line Treatment in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer,” Medical Oncology, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2009, pp. 210-214. doi:10.1007/s12032-008-9108-5
- L. A. G. Ries, M. P. Eisner, C. L. Kosary, B. F. Hankey, B. A. Miller, L. Clegg, et al., “SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1998,” National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, 2012. http://seer.cancer.gov/ Publications/CSR1973_1998/2001
- J. V. Fiorica, J. A. Blessing, L. V. Puneky, A. A. Secord, J. S. Hoffman, S. D. Yamada, et al., “A Phase II Evaluation of Weekly Topotecan as a Single Agent Second Line Therapy in Persistent or Recurrent Carcinoma of the Cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study,” Gynecologic Oncology, Vol. 115, No. 2, 2009, pp. 285-289. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.07.024
- P. Boabang, C. M. Kurbacher, H. Kohlhagen, A. Waida and B. K. Amo-Takyi, “Anti-Neoplastic Activity of Topotecan versus Cisplatin, Etoposide and Paclitaxel in Four Squamous Cell Cancer Cell Lines of the Female Genital Tract Using an ATP-Tumor Chemosensitivity Assay,” Anticancer Drugs, Vol. 11, No. 10, 2000, pp. 843-848.
- K. Noda, H. Sasaki, K. Yamamoto, T. Yamamoto, R. Nishimura, T. Sugiyama, et al., “Phase II Trial of Topotecan for Cervical Cancer of the Uterus,” Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncologists, Vol. 15, 1996, p. 754.
- M. A. Bookman, J. A. Blessing, P. Hanjani, T. J. Herzog and W. A. Andersen, “Topotecan in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: A Phase II Study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group,” Gynecologic Oncology, Vol. 77, No. 3, 2000, pp. 446-449. doi:10.1006/gyno.2000.5807
- N. R. Abu-Rustum, S. Lee and L. S. Massad, “Topotecan for Recurrent Cervical Cancer after Platinum-Based Therapy,” International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2000, pp. 285-288. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1438.2000.010004285.x
- D. H. Moore, J. A. Blessing, R. P. McQuellon, H. T. Thaler, D. Cella, J. Benda, et al., “Phase III Study of Cisplatin with or without Paclitaxel in Stage IVB, Recurrent, or Persistent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 22, No. 15, 2004, pp. 3113-3119.