Clinical and Dosimetric Implications of Air Gaps between Bolus and Skin Surface during Radiation Therapy
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada
- 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada
- 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada
- 4 Department of Radiation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada
- 5 Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Oncology and Radiotherapy, Abbottabad, Pakistan
- 6 Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Paki- stan
- 7 Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Paki- stan
Abstract
Purpose : The main objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of air gaps of 0 - 5.0 cm between bolus and skin for 1.0 cm Superflab bolus on surface dose (D Surf ) and depth of maximum dose (d max ) in solid water and Rando ? phantoms. Methods : In this work, the effects of bolus to surface distance on D Surf and variation in d max were analyzed in a solid water phantom and in an anthropomorphic Rando ? phantom for different field sizes, using Gafchromic ? EBT films and farmer chamber. Results : For field sizes of 5 × 5 cm 2 the D Surf is significantly affected by increasing air gaps greater than 5 mm. For field sizes larger than 10 × 10 cm 2 , D Surf is nearly the same for air gaps of 0 - 5 .0 cm. For small fields and 6 MV photon beam, d max increases with increasing air gap, while for 10 MV beam and smaller field sizes ( i.e. 5 × 5 and 10 × 10 cm 2 ) the d max first decreases and then increases with the air gap s . For both 3DCRT and IMRT plans on Rando ? , D Surf reduction is more prominent with increasing air gaps. Conclusion : For field sizes larger than 10 × 10 cm 2 D Surf is largely unaffected by air gaps. However, smaller air gap results in shallower d max for both 6 MV and 10 MV photon beams at all fields sizes. Special consideration should be taken to reduce air gaps between bolus and skin for field sizes smaller than 10 × 10 cm 2 or when surface contour variations are greater or when the bolus covers small area and at the border of the field .
- F. M. Khan, “The Physics of Radiation Therapy,” Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2010, p. 144.
- M. Stroka, J. Regula and W. Lobodziec, “The Influence of the Bolus-Surface Distance on the Dose Distribution in the Build-Up Region,” Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy, Vol. 15, No. 6, 2010, pp. 161-164. doi:10.1016/j.rpor.2010.09.003
- K. I. Aneta, L. Wlodzimierz, D. Marcin, N. Dorota and I. Tomasz, “Dose Distribution Homogeneity in Two TBI Techniques—Analysis of 208 Irradiated Patients Conducted in Stanislaw Leszczynski Memorial Hospital, Katowice,” Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2012, pp. 367-375. doi:10.1016/j.rpor.2012.07.013
- J. B. Martin, C. Tsang and Y. Peter, “Effects on Skin Dose from Unwanted Air Gaps under Bolus in Photon Beam Radiotherapy,” Radiation Measurements, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2000, pp. 201-204. doi:10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00276-0
- S. H. Hsu, R. Kulasekere and P. L. Roberson, “Analysis of Variation in Calibration Curves for Kodak XV Radiographic Film Using Model-Based Parameters,” Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2010, pp. 222-237.
- K. Alireza, B. Peter, Y. Ellen, et al., “Beam Spoilers versus Bolus for 6 mv Photon Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers,” Medical Dosimetry, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2000, pp. 127-131. doi:10.1016/ S0958-3947(00)00038-8
- S. H. Hsu, P. L. Roberson, Y. Chen, et al., “Assessment of Skin Dose for Breast Chest Wall Radiotherapy as a Function of Bolus Material,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, Vol. 53, No. 10, 2008, pp. 2593-2606. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/10/010
- N. Lee, C. Chuang, J. M. Quivey, et al., “Skin Toxicity Due to IMRT for Head-and-Neck Carcinoma,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2002, pp. 630-637. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02756-6
- P. D. Higgins, E. H. Han, J. L. Yuan and C. K. Lee, “Evaluation of Surface and Superficial Dose for Head and Neck Treatments Using Conventional or IMRT Techniques,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, Vol. 52, 2007, pp. 1135-46. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/52/4/018
- N. Dogan and Glasgow, “Surface and Build-Up Region Dosimetry for Obliquely Incident IMRT 6MV X Rays,” Medical Physics, Vol. 30, No. 12, pp. 3091-3096. doi:10.1118/1.1625116
- S. Yokoyama, P. L. Roberson, D. W. Litzenberg, et al., “Surface Buildup Dose Dependence on Photon Field Delivery Technique for IMRT,” Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2004, pp. 71-81. doi:10.1120/jacmp.2020.21706