Update on Therapeutic Strategy in Lung Carcinoids
- 1 Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS—Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- 2 Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS—Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- 3 Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS—Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- 4 Thoracic Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS—Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- 5 Thoracic Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS—Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- 6 Thoracic Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS—Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- 7 Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS—Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- 8 Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS—Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- 9 Pathology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS—Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- 10 Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS—Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- 11 Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS—Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
Abstract
An estimated 25% to 30% of all neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have their origin in the bronchial tree and into the lungs. Although lung NETs account for less than 1% of all pulmonary malignancies, the incidence of these neoplasms has risen precipitously since the mid 1970s. Currently, according to the 2004 World Health Organization categorization, these tumors are separated into 4 subtypes characterized by increasing biologic aggressiveness: low-grade typical carcinoid (TC), intermediate-grade atypical carcinoid (AC), high-grade large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small-cell carcinoma (SCLC). Surgery is the treatment of choice for typical and atypical carcinoid lung NETs with loco-regional disease. At diagnosis up to 64% of patients with atypical carcinoid lung NETs present with lymph node metastases, and 5-year survival ranges from 61% to 88%. In contrast, lymph node metastases are present in fewer than 15% of typical carcinoid lung NETs, and 5-year survival exceeds 90%. To date, there is no recognized standard of treatment for advanced carcinoid lung NETs. In recent years only two trials reported intriguing results regarding lung NETs: a phase 2 retrospective study of dacarbazine derivative temozolomide and the phase 3, RADIANT-2 trial in advanced NETs. Successful management requires a multidisciplinary team management. This review is restricted to typical/atypical NETs.
- I. M. Modlin, K. D. Lye and M. A. Kidd, “5-Decade Analysis of 13,715 Carcinoid Tumors,” Cancer, Vol. 97, No. 4, 2003, pp. 934-959.
- W. D. Travis, “Lung Tumours with Neuroendocrine Differentiation,” European Journal of Cancer, Vol. 45, Suppl. 1, 2009, pp. 251-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(09)70040-1
- J. C. Yao, M. Hassan, A. Phan, et al., “One Hundred Years after ‘Carcinoid’: Epidemiology of and Prognostic Factors for Neuroendocrine Tumors in 35,825 Cases in the United States.” Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 26, No. 18, 2008, pp. 3063-3072.
- W. D. Travis “Advances in Neuroendocrine Lung Tumors,” Annals of Oncology, Vol. 21, Suppl. 7, 2010, pp. 65-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq380
- O. Hauso, B. I. Gustafsson, M. Kidd, et al., “Neuroendocrine Tumor Epidemiology: Contrasting Norway and North America,” Cancer, Vol. 113, No. 10, 2008, pp. 2655-2664.
- A. M. Isidori, G. A. Kaltsas and A. B. Grossman, “Ectopic ACTH Syndrome,” Frontiers of Hormone Research, Vol. 35, 2006, pp. 143-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000094323
- K. ?berg, P. Hellman, P. Ferolla, et al., “Neuroendocrine Bronchial and Thymic Tumors: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-Up. ESMO Guidelines Working Group,” Annals of Oncology, Vol. 23, Suppl. 7, 2012, pp. 120-123.
- L. Righi, M. Volante, V. Tavaglione, et al., “Somatostatin Receptor Tissue Distribution in Lung Neuroendocrine Tumours: A Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Study of 218 ‘Clinically Aggressive’ Cases,” Annals of Oncology, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2010, pp. 548-555. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/annonc/mdp334
- M. Papotti, S. Croce, M. Bello, et al., “Expression of Somatostatin Receptor Types 2, 3 and 5 in Biopsies and Surgical Specimens of Human Lung Tumours. Correlation with Preoperative Octreotide Scintigraphy,” Virchows Archiv, Vol. 439, 2001, pp. 787-797.
- I. M. Modlin, K. Oberg, D. C. Chung, et al., “Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours,” The Lancet Oncology, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2008, pp. 61-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70410-2
- I. J. Virgolini, M. Gabriel, E. von Guggenberg, et al., “Role of Radiopharmaceuticals in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumours,” European Journal of Cancer, Vol. 45, Suppl. 1, 2009, pp. 274-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(09)70042-5
- P. Antunes, M. Ginji, H. Zhang, et al., “Are Radiogallium-Labelled DOTA-Conjugated Somatostatin Analogues Superior to Those Labelled with Other Radiometals,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Vol. 34, No. 7, 2007, pp. 982-993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00259-006-0317-x