The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma (Breslow Thickness ≤ 0.75 mm and 0.76 mm - 1.0 mm Respectively): Our Results and Review of the Literature — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma (Breslow Thickness ≤ 0.75 mm and 0.76 mm - 1.0 mm Respectively): Our Results and Review of the Literature
Department of Plastic Surgery, Microsurgery and Burns Unit, General Hospital of Athens “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
,
Department of Plastic Surgery, Microsurgery and Burns Unit, General Hospital of Athens “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
,
Department of Plastic Surgery, Microsurgery and Burns Unit, General Hospital of Athens “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
,
Department of Plastic Surgery, Microsurgery and Burns Unit, General Hospital of Athens “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
,
1st Department of Medicine, University of Athens, Medical School, “Laikon” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
,
Department of Plastic Surgery, Microsurgery and Burns Unit, General Hospital of Athens “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
1 Department of Plastic Surgery, Microsurgery and Burns Unit, General Hospital of Athens “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
2 Department of Plastic Surgery, Microsurgery and Burns Unit, General Hospital of Athens “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
3 Department of Plastic Surgery, Microsurgery and Burns Unit, General Hospital of Athens “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
4 Department of Plastic Surgery, Microsurgery and Burns Unit, General Hospital of Athens “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
5 1st Department of Medicine, University of Athens, Medical School, “Laikon” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
6 Department of Plastic Surgery, Microsurgery and Burns Unit, General Hospital of Athens “G. Gennimatas”, Athens, Greece
Introduction: The Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) in melanoma is an important tool of staging. The impact on overall survival still remains unclear. The guidelines in regard to depth, taking in mind where SLNB staging benefits do not outweigh the risks of the procedure, are constantly reviewed and modified. Patients and Methods: From 2010 to 2015, 104 patients with thin melanoma Stage IA with presence of adverse or high risk features and from IB only TIb, N0, M0 (American Joint Committee on Cancer, AJCC Melanoma Staging and Classification 7 th Edition 2009) were included and divided into 2 groups: Group A: 68 patients with Breslow ≤ 0.75 mm and Group B: 36 patients with Breslow 0.76 - 1.0 mm. Initially all patients underwent excision of the primary site and subsequently wide local excision and SLNB. We analyzed the histopathology reports of SLNB procedures in both groups. Results: There was no positive SLN in group A (0%). 4 patients from group B had positive SLN (11.1%) and underwent Completion Lymph Node Dissection (CLND). The total percentage of positive SLNs from both groups was 3.8%. Conclusions: Our findings justify the SLNB procedure in thin melanomas of 0.76 - 1.0 mm. In melanomas ≤ 0.75 mm, SLNB should be considered on an individual basis when “high-risk features” are present. More comparable studies should be evaluated in order to accurately define the threshold value of Breslow thickness where SLNB is safely deemed unnecessary.
KeywordsThin MelanomaSLNSLNB
Balch, C.M., Gershenwald, J.E., Soong, S.J., Thompson, J.F., Atkins, M.B., Byrd, D.R., Buzaid, A.C., Cochran, A.J., Coit, D.G., Ding, S., Eggermont, A.M., Flaherty, K.T., Gimotty, P.A., Kirkwood, J.M., McMasters, K.M., Mihm Jr., M.C., Morton, D.L., Ross, M.I., Sober, A.J. and Sondak, V.K. (2009) Final Version of 2009 AJCC Melanoma Staging and Classification. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27, 6199-6206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4799
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2011) Melanoma. Version 4. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines).
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2013) Melanoma. Version 2. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines).
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2016) Melanoma. Version 1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines).
Bedrosian, I., Faries, M.B., Guerry 4th, D., Elenitsas, R., Schuchter, L., Mick, R., Spitz, F.R., Bucky, L.P., Alavi, A., Elder, D.E., Fraker, D.L. and Czerniecki, B.J. (2000) Incidence of Sentinel Node Metastasis in Patients with Thin Primary Melanoma ( http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10434-000-0262-z
Bleicher, R.J., Essner, R., Foshag, L.J., Wanek, L.A. and Morton, D.L. (2003) Role of Sentinel Lymphadenectomy in Thin Invasive Cutaneous Melanomas. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21, 1326-1331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.06.123
Kesmodel, S.B., Karakousis, G.C., Botbyl, J.D., Canter, R.J., Lewis, R.T., Wahl, P.M., Terhune, K.P., Alavi, A., Elder, D.E., Ming, M.E., Guerry, D., Gimotty, P.A., Fraker, D.L., Czerniecki, B.J. and Spitz, F.R. (2005) Mitotic Rate as a Predictor of Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity in Patients with Thin Melanomas. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 12, 449-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2005.04.027
Wong, S.L., Brady, M.S., Busam, K.J. and Coit, D.G. (2006) Results of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Thin Melanoma. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 13, 302-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.02.021
Ranieri, J.M., Wagner, J.D., Wenck, S., Johnson, C.S. and Coleman 3rd, J.J. (2006) The Prognostic Importance of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 13, 927-932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.04.023
Wright, B.E., Scheri, R.P., Ye, X., Faries, M.B., Turner, R.R., Essner, R. and Morton, D.L. (2008) Importance of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Thin Melanoma. JAMA Surgery, 143, 892-899; Discussion 899-900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.9.892
Vermeeren, L., Van der Ent, F., Sastrowijoto, P. and Hulsewé, K. (2010) Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Thin Melanoma: Occurrence of Nodal Metastases and Its Prognostic Value. European Journal of Dermatology, 20, 30-34.
Murali, R., Haydu, L.E., Quinn, M.J., Saw, R.P.M., Shannon, K., Spillane, A.J., Stretch, J.R., Thompson, J.F. and Scolyer, R.A. (2012) Path Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Thin Primary Cutaneous Melanoma. Annals of Surgery, 255, 128-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182306c72
Hinz, T., Ahmadzadehfar, H., Wierzbicki, A., Holler, T., Wenzel, J., Biersack, H.J., Bieber, T. and Schmid-Wendtner, M.H. (2012) Prognostic Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in 121 Low-Risk Melanomas (Tumor Thickness http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-2009-4
Han, D., Yu, D., Zhao, X., Marzban, S.S., Messina, J.L., Gonzalez, R.J., Cruse, C.W., Sarnaik, A.A., Puleo, C., Sondak, V.K. and Zager, J.S. (2012) Sentinel Node Biopsy Is Indicated for Thin Melanomas ≥ 0.76 mm. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 19, 3335-3342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2469-1
Cascinelli, N., Belli, F., Santinami, M., Fait, V., Testori, A., Ruka, W., et al. (2000) Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Melanoma: The WHO Melanoma Program Experience. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 7, 469-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10434-000-0469-z
Mraz-Gernhard, S., Sagebiel, R.W., Kashani-Sabet, M., Miller III, J.R. and Leong, S.P. (1998) Prediction of Sentinel Lymph Node Micrometastasis by Histological Features in Primary Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. Archives of Dermatology, 134, 983-987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archderm.134.8.983
Joseph, E., Brobeil, A., Glass, F., Glass, J., Messina, J., DeConti, R., et al. (1998) Results of Complete Lymph Node Dissection in 83 Melanoma Patients with Positive Sentinel Nodes. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 5, 119-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02303844
Gershenwald, J.E., Thompson, W., Mansfield, P.F., Lee, J.E., Colome, M.I., Tseng, C.H., Lee, J.J., Balch, C.M., Reintgen, D.S. and Ross, M.I. (1999) Multi-Institutional Melanoma Lymphatic Mapping Experience: The Prognostic Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Status in 612 Stage I or II Melanoma Patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17, 976-983.
Wagner, J.D., Gordon, M.S., Chuang, T.Y., Coleman, J.J., Hayes, J.T., Jung, S.-H. and Love, C. (2000) Predicting Sentinel and Residual Lymph Node Basin Disease after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma. Cancer, 89, 453-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20000715)89:2 3.0.CO;2-V
Nguyen, C.L., McClay, E.F., Cole, D.J., O’Brien, P.H., Gillanders, W.E., Metcalf, J.S., Maize, J.C. and Baron, P.L. (2001) Melanoma Thickness and Histology Predict Sentinel Lymph Node Status. The American Journal of Surgery, 181, 8-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00533-X
McMasters, K.M., Wong, S.L., Edwards, M.J., Ross, M.I., Chao, C., Noyes, R.D., Viar, V., Cerrito, P.B. and Reintgen, D.S. (2001) Factors That Predict the Presence of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Melanoma. Surgery, 130, 151-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/msy.2001.115830
Rousseau Jr., D.L., Ross, M.I., Johnson, M.M., Prieto, V.G., Lee, J.E., Mansfield, P.F. and Gershenwald, J.E. (2003) Revised American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Criteria Accurately Predict Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity in Clinically Node-Negative Melanoma Patients. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 10, 569-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2003.09.016
Sondak, V.K., Taylor, J.M., Sabel, M.S., Wang, Y., Lowe, L., Grover, A.C., et al. (2004) Mitotic Rate and Younger Age Are Predictors of Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity: Lessons Learned from the Generation of a Probabilistic Model. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 11, 247-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2004.03.044
Thompson, J.F. and Shaw, H.M. (2004) Editorial: Should Tumor Mitotic Rate and Patient Age, as Well as Tumor Thickness, Be Used to Select Melanoma Patients for Sentinel Node Biopsy? Annals of Surgical Oncology, 11, 233-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2004.01.912