Initial Experience with Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (SenoBright)—In a Comprehensive Clinical Breast Center
- 1 Elliott-Baucom Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
- 2 Elliott-Baucom Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
- 3 Elliott-Baucom Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
- 4 Elliott-Baucom Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
- 5 Elliott-Baucom Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of initiating contrast enhanced digital mammography in our center was to evaluate the complimentary benefit of this technology with screening digital mammography and real time ultrasound in equivocal cases and high risk patients with dense breast. The intended goal was to reduce the incidence of further diagnostic and invasive procedures. Methods: Patients thought to be candidates who had good renal function confirmed by serum Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Creatinine were offered the procedure, and 225 patients had the procedure during the period of March 2013 through November 2014. The contrast enhanced digital mammograms (SenoBright) are performed on the Senograph Essential Unit. A total of 8 images are obtained: 4 conventional digital mammograms and 4 contrast enhanced digital mammograms. The patients with a positive SenoBright study had a tissue diagnosis of the lesion obtained by either a stereotactic needle biopsy, ultrasound guided core biopsy, or ultrasound directed open excisional biopsy. Results: The 225 patients who had the procedure included high risk patients with dense breast (41), patients with abnormal mammograms (92), and patients with equivocal clinical, mammographic and real time ultrasound findings (92). 31 studies were interpreted as positive and 194 as negative. 33 biopsies were performed, with 31 patients having a positive study and 2 patients with a negative study. 22 cancers were detected. Conclusion: We found that the addition of dynamic contrast enhanced digital subtraction mammography (SenoBright) was helpful in distinguishing malignant from non-malignant lesions. It was also effective in demonstrating multifocal lesions and identifying non-palpable occult carcinomas in the dense breast. It proved to be a valuable complimentary adjunctive diagnostic modality for a comprehensive clinical breast center.
- Pisano, E.D., Gatsonis, C. and Hendrick, E. (2005) Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer screening. The New England Journal of Medicine, 17, 1773-1783. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa052911
- Dickmann, F., Diekmann, S. and Jeunehomme, F. (2005) Digital Mammography Using Iodine-Based Contrast Media “Initial Clinical Experience with Dynamic Contrast Medium Enhancement. Investigative Radiology, 40, 397-404. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rli.0000167421.83203.4e
- Dromain, C., Balleyquier, C. and Muller, S. (2006) Evaluation of Tumor Angiogenesis of Breast Carcinoma Using Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography. AJR, 187, 528-537. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.1944
- Diekmann, F., Freyer, M., Diekmann, S. and Fallenberg, E.M. (2011) Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography. European Journal of Radiology, 78, 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.10.002
- Diekmann, F. and Ulrich, B. (2007) Tomosynthesis and Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography. European Radiology, 17, 3086-3092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0715-x
- Jong, R.A., Yaffe, M.J. and Skarpathiotakis, M. (2003) Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography: Initial Clinical Experience. Radiology, 228, 842-850. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2283020961
- Lewin, J.M., Isaacs, P.K., Vance, V. and Larke, F.J. (2003) Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Digital Subtraction Mammography: Feasibility. Radiology, 229, 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2291021276
- Dromain, C., Thibault, F., Dickmann, F. and Fallenberg, E.M. (2012) Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography: Initial Clinical Results of a Multireader, Multicase Study. Breast Cancer Research, 14, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3210
- Jochelson, M. (2014) Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 52, 609-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2013.12.004
- Sleeba, T., Subapradha, A., Ramachondran, M. and Krishnoswami, M. (2013) Role of Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography as a Problem-Solving Tool in Dense Breasts: A Case Report. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging, 23, 219-222. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.120269
- Jochelson, M.S., Dershaw, G.D., Sury, J.S. and Heendt, A.S. (2013) Bilateral Contrast-Enhanced Dual-Energy Digital Mammography: Feasibility and Comparison with Conventional Digital Mammography and MR Imaging in Women with Known Breast Carcinoma. Radiology, 266, 743-751.