Simplifying Laparoscopic Surgery for Left Side Colon and Rectal Cancer Using Linear Stapler for Vascular Ligation: A Prospective Cohort Study
- 1 Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan
- 2 Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan
- 3 Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan
- 4 Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan
- 5 Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan
- 6 Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan
- 7 Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan
Abstract
Introduction: Systematic lymphadenectomy and ligation of the feeding artery is extremely important when performing radical resection in colorectal cancer. However, vascular surgery via laparoscopy requires advanced skills and techniques; thus, this procedure needs to be simplified while maintaining quality of the surgery to make it a preferred technique for the surgeons. Methods: There were 49 patients who underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy or anterior resection till T2 level for sigmoid colon cancer and recto-sigmoid colon cancer. We analyzed short-term and long-term outcomes between stapling ligation and clipping ligation techniques used in these surgeries. Results: The mean volume of blood loss in the stapling ligation group was 12.8 ± 12.3 ml, which was significantly lower than 41.9 ± 71.2 ml of mean volume of blood loss in the clipping ligation group. There was no significant difference in the mean duration of surgery, the mean number of harvested lymph nodes, morbidity, recurrence, and 5-year relapse free survival rates between the 2 groups. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a surgical technique using staplers for vascular treatment of tumor-feeding arteries as a new technical improvement in laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of early-stage colon cancer. We found that the described procedure was technically safe, simple, convenient, and oncologically valid.
- Jacobs, M., Verdeja, J.C. and Goldstein, H.S. (1991) Minimally Invasive Colon Resection (Laparoscopic Colectomy). Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 1, 144-150.
- Wexner, S.D., Cohen, S.M., Johansen, O.B., Nogueras, J.J. and Jagelman, D.G. (1993) Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective Assessment and Current Perspective. British Journal of Surgery, 80, 1602-1605. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800801238
- Lacy, A.M., Garcia-Valdecasas, J.C., Delgado, S., Castells, A., Taura, P., Pique, J.M. and Visa, J. (2002) Laparoscopy-Assisted Colectomy versus Open Colectomy for Treatment of Non-Metastatic Colon Cancer: A Randomised Trial. The Lancet, 359, 2224-2229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5
- Milson, J.W., Bohm, B., Hammerhofer, K.A., Fazio, V., Steiger, E. and Elson, P. (1998) A Prospective Randomised Trial Comparing Laparoscopic versus Conventional Techniques in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Preliminary Report. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 187, 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00132-X
- Guillou, P.J., Quirke, P., Thorpe, H., Walker, J., Jayne, D.G., Smith, A.M., Heath, R.M. and Brown, J.M., MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2005) Short-Term Endopoints of Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Patients with Colorectal Cancer (MRC CLASICC Trial): Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial. The Lancet, 365, 1718-1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2
- Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine, 350, 2050-2059. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa032651
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2010) JSCCR Guidelines 2010 for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. Kanehara & Co. Ltd., Tokyo.
- Fleshman, J., Sargent, D.J., Green, E., Anvari, M., Stryker, S.J., Beart Jr., R.W., Hellinger, M., Flanagan Jr., R., Peters, W. and Nelson, H., Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic Colectomy for Cancer Is Not Inferior to Open Surgery Based on 5-Year Data from the COST Study Group Trial. Annals of Surgery, 246, 662-664. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e318155a762
- Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2009) Survival after Laparoscopic Surgery versus Open Surgery for Colon Cancer: Long-Term Outcome of Randomized Clinical Trial. Lancet Oncology, 10, 44-52.
- Jayne, D.V., Guillou, P.J., Thorpe, H., Quirke, P., Copeland, J., Smith, A.M., Heath, R.M. and Brown, J.M. (2007) Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Colorectal Carcinoma: 3-Year Results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25, 3061-3068. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758