A Novel Next-Generation Sequencing Approach without Donor-Derived Material for Acute Rejection and Infection Monitoring in Solid Organ Transplantation
- 1 The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 2 BGI-Guangdong, BGI-Shenzhen, Guangzhou, China
- 3 Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Biomedicine, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen DK, Denmark
- 4 BGI-Guangdong, BGI-Shenzhen, Guangzhou, China
- 5 BGI-Guangdong, BGI-Shenzhen, Guangzhou, China
- 6 BGI-Guangdong, BGI-Shenzhen, Guangzhou, China
- 7 National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China
- 8 The Translational Medicine Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 9 State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China
- 10 The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 11 The Translational Medicine Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 12 The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 13 The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 14 The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 15 James D. Watson Institute of Genome Sciences, Hangzhou, China
- 16 BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
- 17 The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 18 BGI-Guangzhou, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Cancer Trans-Omics Research, Guangzhou, China
Abstract
Background: Donor-derived cell free DNA ( ddcf DNA) has been reported as a universal noninvasive biomarker for rejection monitoring in heart, kidney, liver, and lung transplantation. Current approaches based on next-generation sequencing for quantification of ddcf DNA, although promising, may be restricted by the requirement for donor material, as donor samples may not be available. Methods : We proposed a novel next-generation sequencing ap proach without donor-derived material and compared the non-donor-derived approach and the donor-derived approach using simulation testing and 69 clinical specimens. We also evaluated the performance for acute rejection and infection monitoring in lung transplantation. Results: The non-donor-derived approach reached similar efficacy as the donor-derived approach with a significant linear correlation of R 2 = 0.98. Subsequent validation in clinical specimens demonstrated significant difference between the acute rejection group (4.83% ± 2.11%, mean ± SD) and the non-rejection group (1.61% ± 0.63%, mean ± SD) ( P < 0.0001, Welch ’ s t test). With the cut-off value of 2.999, our approach had 90.48% sensitivity (95% CI, 69.62% - 98.83%), 100% specificity (95% CI, 91.59% - 100%), and AUC 0.9266 (95% CI, 0.8277 - 1.026). The test also had the ability to simultaneously detect infectious agents, especially cytomegalovirus, as compared with the clinical test. Conclusion: The proposed approach without donor-derived material could potentially be used to monitor acute rejection and infection in lung transplantation and may be applied to other types of solid organ transplantation.
- Castleberry, A.W., Worni, M., Kuchibhatla, M., Lin, S.S., Snyder, L.D., Shofer, S.L., et al. (2013) A Comparative Analysis of Bronchial Stricture after Lung Transplantation in Recipients with and without Early Acute Rejection. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 96, 1008-1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.104
- Christie, J.D., Edwards, L.B., Aurora, P., Dobbels, F., Kirk, R., Rahmel, A.O., et al. (2009) The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Twenty-Sixth Official Adult Lung and Heart-Lung Transplantation Report-2009. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 28, 1031-1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2009.08.004
- Bhorade, S.M., Husain, A.N., Liao, C., Li, L.C., Ahya, V.N., Baz, M.A., et al. (2013) Interobserver Variability in Grading Transbronchial Lung Biopsy Specimens after Lung Transplantation. Chest, 143, 1717-1724. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-2107
- Hachem, R.R. (2009) Lung Allograft Rejection: Diagnosis and Management. Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation, 14, 477-482. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0b013e32832fb981
- Gordon, I.O., Bhorade, S., Vigneswaran, W.T., Garrity, E.R. and Husain, A.N. (2012) SaLUTaRy: Survey of Lung Transplant Rejection. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 31, 972-979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2012.05.014
- Borewicz, K., Pragman, A.A., Kim, H.B., Hertz, M., Wendt, C. and Isaacson, R.E. (2013) Longitudinal Analysis of the Lung Microbiome in Lung Transplantation. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 339, 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12053
- Lo, Y.M., Tein, M.S., Pang, C.C., Yeung, C.K., Tong, K.L. and Hjelm, N.M. (1998) Presence of Donor-Specific DNA in Plasma of Kidney and Liver-Transplant Recipients. Lancet, 351, 1329-1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79055-3
- Garcia Moreira, V., Prieto García, B., Baltar Martín, J.M., Ortega Suárez, F. and Alvarez, F.V. (2009) Cell-Free DNA as a Noninvasive Acute Rejection Marker in Renal Transplantation. Clinical Chemistry, 55, 1958-1966. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2009.129072
- Gadi, V.K., Nelson, J.L., Boespflug, N.D., Guthrie, K.A. and Kuhr, C.S. (2006) Soluble Donor DNA Concentrations in Recipient Serum Correlate with Pancreas-Kidney Rejection. Clinical Chemistry, 52, 379-382. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.058974
- Snyder, T.M., Khush, K.K., Valantine, H.A. and Quake, S.R. (2011) Universal Noninvasive Detection of Solid Organ Transplant Rejection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA, 108, 6229-6234. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013924108