New Look on Ureterocolic Diversion with Adjuvant Radiotherapy; SECI (South Egypt Cancer Institute) Experience
- 1 Surgical Oncology Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
- 2 Surgical Oncology Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
- 3 Urology Unit, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
- 4 Radiotherapy Department, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Uret e rosigmoidostomy was the first form of continent urinary diversion and had broad popularity during the first half of the 20th century. Primary enthusiasm was followed by disappointment when serious problems such as pyelonephritis, electrolyt e imbalance, renal calculi and renal function deterioration become evident. In the 1950s these life threatening complications led to avoid this urinary diversion in favor of uretro-intestinal conduits. Objectives: Our aim was to evaluate our experience in uret e rocolic shunt after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Methodology: This study was conducted in surgical oncology department, South Egypt cancer institute, Assiut university; in the period from January 2012 to January 2017 and including 115 patients (75 males & 40 females). Results: This is retrospective study including 115 patients (75 males & 40 females). Operative time was 130 minutes ranging between 2 to 2.5 hours. Average blood loss was 450 ml. After removal of rectal tube all patients were continent except 15 patients who were improved after 1 - 3 days. Within a month 12 patients had night incontinence and 5 patients had day time incontinence. After that day and night continence gradually improved in all patients except two females who had persistent night soiling and was in need for night time rectal tube. Conclusion: Uret e rosigmoidostomy regains the interest of surgical oncology and urologist because of its simplicity and absence of appliance as many patients refusing cutaneous stoma and others are not suitable for orthotopic substitutes.
- Clarke, B.G. and Leadbetter, W.F. (1955) Ureterosigmoidostomy: Uollective Review of Results in 2897 Reported Cases. The Journal of Urology, 73, 999-1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)67512-8
- Zincke, H. and Segura, J.W. (1975) Ureterosigmoidostomy: Critical Review of 173 Cases. The Journal of Urology, 113, 324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59472-0
- Lapides, J. (1951) Mechanism of Electrolyte Imbalance Following Ureterosigmoid Transplantation. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, 93-691.
- Stamey, T.A. (1956) The Pathogenesis and Implications of the Electrolyte Imbalance in Ureterosigmoidostomy. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, 103-736.
- Wilkinson, A.W. (1954) Biochemical Disturbances after Transplantation of the Ureters. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 30-405.
- Sorriyaarchchi, G.S., Johnson, R.O. and Carbone, P.P. (1977) Neoplasms of the Large Bowel Following Ureterosigmoidostom. The Archives of Surgery, 112-1174.
- Rivard, J.Y., Bedard, A. and Dionne, L. (1975) Colonic Neoplasms Following Ureterosigmoidostomy. The Journal of Urology, 113-781.
- Shapiro, A., et al. (1979) Carcinoma of Colon after Ureterocolic Anastomosis. Urology, 13-617.
- El-Mekresh, M.M., Hafez, A.T., Abol-Enein, H. and Ghoneim, M.A. (1997) Double Folded Rectosigmoid Bladder with a New Urterocolic Antireflux Technique. The Journal of Urology, 157, 2085-2089. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64681-0
- Gerhaz, E.W., Kohl, U.N., Weingartner, K., Kleinhans, B.J., Mekelos, M.D. and Riedmiller, H. (1998) Experience with the Mainze Modification of Ureterosigmoidostomy. British Journal of Surgery, 85, 1512-1516. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00904.x
- Obek, C., Kural, A.R., Ataus, S., Coskuner, E., Demikesen, O., Citici, A., Onder, A.U. and Solok, V. (2001) Complications of the Mainz Pouch II (Sigma Rectal Pouch). European Urology, 39, 204-211. https://doi.org/10.1159/000052437
- Nassar, O. (2002) Mainz II Pouch: A Simple Continent Urinary Diversion after Cystectomy. Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 14, 267-274.
- Fisch, M., Wammack, R. and Hohenfellner, R. (1996) The Sigma Rectum Pouch (Mainz Pouch II). World Journal of Urology, 14, 68-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182560
- Stein, R., Fisch, M., Stockle, M. and Hohenfellne, R. (1995) Urinary Diversion in Bladder Exstrophy and Incontinent Epispadias: 25 Years of Experience. The Journal of Urology, 154, 1177-1181. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199509000-00093