Retrospective Analysis of S-1 plus Bevacizumab as Maintenance Therapy after Induction of S-1 and Oxaliplatin (SOX) plus Bevacizumab as First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- 1 Department of Surgery, Fuchu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- 2 Department of Surgery, Fuchu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- 3 Department of Surgery, Fuchu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- 4 Department of Surgery, Fuchu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- 5 Department of Surgery, Fuchu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- 6 Department of Surgery, Fuchu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- 7 Department of Surgery, Fuchu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- 8 Department of Surgery, Fuchu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- 9 Department of Surgery, Fuchu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- 10 Department of Surgery, Fuchu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- 11 Department of Surgery, Fuchu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- 12 Department of Surgery, Fuchu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- 13 Department of Surgery, Fuchu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- 14 Department of Surgery, Fuchu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
Abstract
Background: The SOFT study was a phase III trial designed to validate the non-inferiority of S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab to mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab in terms of PFS in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who had not previously received chemotherapy. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed cases in which S-1 plus bevacizumab as maintenance therapy after induction of S-1 and Oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer was applied in order to evaluate its efficacy and safety in clinical practice. Material and method: Among the 40 patients with mCRC at the Fuchu Hospital who received SOX plus bevacizum ab as a first line treatment between August 2013 and December 2018. The eligibl e patients had histological ly confirmed mCRC. On day 1 of each 3-week period during the study, patients in the SOX plus bevacizumab received a 7.5 mg/kg intravenous infusion of bevacizumab, followed by an intravenous infusion of 130 mg/m 2 oxaliplatin. S-1 (40 - 60 mg) was administered orally two times per day from after dinner on day 1 to after breakfast on day 15, followed by a 7-day rest. Results: The median PFS was 15.0 months and median OS was 36.0 months. The response rate (RR: complete pus partial response) was 85.0%, and the disease control rate (DCR: RR plus stable disease) was 92.5%. The most common adverse events with SOX plus bevacizumab were hypertension (50%), neurosensory toxicity (50%), anorexia (32.5%), fatigue (45%), pigmentation (39%), Neutrophil count decreased (30%), and platelet count decreased (40%). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neurosensory toxicity (5%) and fatigue (9%). Conclusion: This study revealed that the survival benefit of S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab in Japanese patients with mCRC was like that observed in previous clinical trials. Therefore, S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab can be considered as routine first-line treatment option for patients with mCRC.
- Pirkin, D.M., Bray, F., Ferlay, J., et al. (2005) Global Cancer Statistics, 2002. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 55, 74-108. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74
- Kotake, K., Honjo, S., Sugihara, K., et al. (2003) Changes in Colorectal Cancer during a 20-Year Period: An Extended Report from the Multi-Institutional Registry of Large Bowel Cancer, Japan. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 46, S32-S43.
- de Gramont, A., Figer, A., Seymour, M., et al. (2000) Leucovorin and Fluorouracil with or without Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18, 2938-2947. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.16.2938
- Tournigand, C., Andre, T., Achille, E., et al. (2004) FOLFIRI Followed by FOLFOX6 or the Reverse Sequence in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized GERCOR Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22, 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.05.113
- Cassidy, J., Tabernerro, J., Twelves, C., et al. (2004) XELOX (Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin): Active First Line Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 22, 2084-2091. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.11.069
- Cassidy, J., Clarks, S., Diaz-Rubio, E., et al. (2008) Randomized Phase III Study of Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin Compared with Fluorouracil/Folinic Acid plus Oxaliplatin as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26, 2006-2012. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9898
- Uchima, Y., Nishii, T., Iseki, M., et al. (2014) Retrospective Analysis of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (XELOX) plus Bevacizumab as a First-Line Treatment for Japanese Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 2, 134-138. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2013.205
- Satoh, T. and Sakata, Y. (2012) S-1 for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 13, 1943-1959. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2012.709234
- Yamada, Y., Takahari, D., Matsumoto, H., et al. (2013) Leucovorin, Fluorouracil, and Oxaliplatin plus Bevacizumab versus S-1 and Oxaliplatin plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (SOFT): An Open-Label, Non-Inferiority, Randomised Phase 3 Trial. The Lancet Oncology, 14, 1278-1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70490-X
- Baba, H., Yamada, Y., Takahari, D., et al. (2017) S-1 and Oxaliplatin (SOX) plus Bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 plus Bevacizumab as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Updated Overall Survival Analyses of the Open-Label, Non-Inferiority, Randomised Phase III: SOFT Study. ESMO Open, 2, e000135. https://doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000135