Performance Evaluation of Two Glucometers: RIGHTEST TM GM700S and RIGHTEST TM GM550 from Bionime
- 1 Pharmaceutical Biochemistry Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal
- 2 Biochemistry-Hematology Laboratory, Fann University Hospital, Dakar, Senegal
- 3 Biochemistry-Hematology Laboratory, Fann University Hospital, Dakar, Senegal
- 4 Pharmaceutical Biochemistry Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal
- 5 Pharmaceutical Biochemistry Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal
- 6 Biochemistry-Hematology Laboratory, Fann University Hospital, Dakar, Senegal
- 7 Joint Research, Exploration and Diagnostic Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, Iba Der Thiam
- 8 Pharmaceutical Biochemistry Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal
- 9 Pharmaceutical Biochemistry Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal
- 10 Pharmaceutical Biochemistry Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal
Abstract
Glucometers are medical devices that provide glycemic monitoring. On-site verification of the performance of a glucometer is a requirement of ISO 22870. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of two glucometers (RIGHTEST TM GM700S and GM550). This is a prospective analytical study, carried out at the Biochemistry-Hematology Laboratory of the Fann University Hospital. The parameters studied were venous glycemia and capillary glycemia. The main evaluation parameters used were: repeatability, reproducibility, estimation of accuracy and comparison of methods. The performance criteria used were those of the French Society of Clinical Biology (SFBC) and the DIN EN ISO 15197: 2013 standard. The coefficients of variation of reproducibility (1.88%; 2.2%) and repeatability (1.93%; 1.8%) of the two glucometers complied with the SFBC criteria. The accuracy estimate showed a bias of −15% in accordance with the requirements of DIN EN ISO 15197:2013. The comparison of capillary glycemia values and those obtained with the reference automatons showed satisfactory linearity and good agreement. The glucometers showed acceptable performance compared to the accepted standards. They are suitable for self-monitoring of glycemia levels in diabetic patients.
- American Diabetes Association (2000) Clinical Practice Recommendations. Position Statement: Tests of Glycemia in Diabetes. Diabetes Care , 23, S80-S82.
- Tebaibia, A., Malek, R., Griene, L., El Madhi Haddam, A., Nouri, N., Cherrak, A., et al. (2023) Evaluation of the Clinical and Analytical Performance of the Vital Check® MM-1200/MS-2 Strips Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Real Life. Médecine des Maladies Métaboliques , 17, 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mmm.2023.04.002
- Mathieu-Fritz, A. and Guillot, C. (2017) Diabetes Self-Monitoring Devices and Transformations in “Patient Work”. Revue d ’ anthropologie des connaissances , 11, 641-675. https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.037.k
- Ogunbosi, B.O., Jarrett, O.O., Orimadegun, A.E., Ayoola, O.O. and Osinusi, K. (2022) Comparison of Point-of-Care Glucometers and Laboratory Based Glucose Oxidase Test in Determining Blood Glucose Levels. Nigerian Journal of Paediatrics , 49, 266-271. https://doi.org/10.4314/njp.v49i3.7
- Kolarić, V. (2022) Chronic Complications of Diabetes and Quality of Life. Acta clinica croatica , 61, 520-527. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.03.18
- Ko, D., Lim, S., Song, S.H., Choi, S.H., Park, Y.J., Park, K.U., et al. (2010) Performance Evaluation of the Glucodr Plus Glucometer. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics , 12, 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2009.0134
- Kouassi, K.C., Biladama, M., Fétéké, L. and Karou, D.S. (2020) On-Site Verification of the Performance of the ACCU-Check Active Glucometer versus the Automate Selectra Pro M: Comparative Study on 263 Cases Collected at the CHU Campus of Lomé. Journal of Scientific Research of the University of Lomé , 22, 249-264.
- Vassault, A., Grafmeyer, D., De graeve, J., Cohen, R., Beaudonnet, A. and Bienvenu, J. (1999) Medical Biology Analyses: Specifications and Standards of Acceptability for Use in the Validation of Techniques. Annals of Clinical Biology , 57, 685-695.
- Fonfrede, M., Jday-Daly, I., De Curraize, C., Augereau-Vacher, C., Lefevre, G. and Hennequin-Le Meur, C. (2011) Blood Glucose Meters: Comparison of Results from 5 Meters and Deviation from Laboratory Venous Blood Glucose. Diabetes & Metabolism , 37, A27. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1262-3636(11)70593-6
- Solnica, B., Naskalski, J.W. and Sieradzki, J. (2003) Analytical Performance of Glucometers Used for Routine Glucose Self-Monitoring of Diabetic Patients. Clinica Chimica Acta , 331, 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-8981(03)00079-2