Effects of Metformin and Pioglitazone on impaired glucose tolerance patients—An open level prospective study
- 1 Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, India
- 2 Malda Medical College, Malda, India
- 3 Mednipore Medical College, Midnapore, India
Abstract
Introduction: impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) often leads to type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and macro vascular disease; and usually associated with insulin resistance. Pioglitazone and metformin are commonly used insulin sensitizers (IS); and can prevent or delay the development T2DM and macro vascular disease. This study was deployed to search the better IS between these two in relation to plasma glucose and lipid control; and physical parameter altering effect. Materials and methods: 100 IGT patients selected randomly from outpatients department following prefixed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pioglitazone and metformin were administered sequentially. Washout period was 2 weeks. Total follow up period was 24 weeks. Results: 70 IGT patients had completed the study. Metformin had reduced plasma glucose (fasting & postprandial), lipids and physical parameters significantly (p < 0.05) more than Pioglitazone. Discussion: Metformin, a hepatic insulin sensitizer, is more effective than PPAR-□ agonist Pioglitazone in the treatment of IGT; and this is due to the expression of PPAR-□ is more in adipose tissue but postprandial utilization of plasma glucose is more in muscle tissue.
- Bennett, P.H. and Knowler, W.C. (2010) Definition, diagnosis, and classification of diabetes mellitus and glucose homeostasis. In: Kahn, C.R., King, G.L., Moses, A.C., Weir, G.C., Jacobson, A.M. and Smith, R.J., Eds., Joslin’s Diabetes Mellitus, 14th Edition, Walter Kluwer Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 331-339.
- Gavin, J.R., III, Albert, K.G.M.M., Davidson, M.B. et al. (1997) Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 20, 1183-1197.
- Edelstein, S.L., Knowler, W.C., Bain, R.P., et al. (1997) Predictors of progression from impaired glucose tolerance to NIDDM: An analysis of six prospective studies. Diabetes, 46, 701-710. doi:10.2337/diabetes.46.4.701
- The DECODE Study Group, European Diabetes Epidemiological Group. Diabetes epidemiology: collaborative analysis of diagnostic criteria in Europe. (1999) Glucose tolerance and mortality: Comparison of WHO and American Diabetes association diagnostic criteria. Lancet, 354, 617-621. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)12131-1
- Buchanon, T.A., Xiang, A.H., Peters, R.K., et al. (2001) Protection from type 2 diabetes persists in the TRIPOD cohort eight months after stopping trogitazone. Diabetes, 50, 327.
- Isommaa, B., Almgren, P., Hericson, M., et al. (1999) Chronic complications in patients with slowly progressing autoimmune type 1 diabetes (LADA). Diabetes Care, 22, 137-1353. doi:10.2337/diacare.22.8.1347
- Knowler, W.C., Barret-Connor, E., Fowler, S.E., et al., Diabtes Prevention Program Group (2002) Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with life style intervention or metformin. The New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 393-403.
- The Diabetes Prevention Progression Research Group (2002) Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with life style intervention of metformin. The New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 393-403. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa012512
- Groop, L. (2000) Genetics of the metabolic syndrome. British Journal of Nutrition, 83, S39-S48.
- Olefsky, J.M., Revers, R.R., Prince, M., et al. (1985) Insulin resistance in non-insulin dependent (type II) and insulin dependent (type I) diabetes mellitus. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 189, 176-205.
- Ratzmann, K.P., Ruhnke, R. and Kohnert, K.D. (1983) Effect of pharmacological suppression of insulin secretion on tissue sensitivity to insulin in subjects with moderate obesity. International Journal of Obesity, 7, 453-458.