Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glulisine in Intensive Insulin Therapy: Bolus Insulin Adjust Nice Control by apiDRA Study (BANDRA Study)
- 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital, Fukui, Japan
- 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital, Fukui, Japan
- 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital, Fukui, Japan
- 4 Department of Internal Medicine, Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital, Fukui, Japan
- 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital, Fukui, Japan
- 6 Department of Internal Medicine, Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital, Fukui, Japan
- 7 Department of Internal Medicine, Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital, Fukui, Japan
- 8 Department of Internal Medicine, Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital, Fukui, Japan
Abstract
Background: Treatment for postprandial glycemia using rapid-acting insulin analogues sometimes resulted in preprandial hypoglycemia or weight gain. Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching bolus insulin from insulin lispro (Lis) to insulin glulisine (Glu) in patients with inadequately controlled diabetes on intensive insulin therapy with Lis and glargine (Gla). Methods: Seventy-two outpatients with inadequate glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] ≥ 7.0%, glycated albumin [GA] ≥ 20%) on intensive insulin therapy comprising Lis and Gla for ≥ 24 weeks were enrolled. We switched treatment from Lis to Glu with a stepwise increase in the dose by 1 unit per meal to obtain a GA level of ≤ 20% for 24 weeks, and the efficacy and safety were evaluated. Patients’ treatment satisfaction was also evaluated using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) after the treatment. Results: After switching from Lis to Glu, both HbA1c and GA levels significantly lowered from 8.26% ± 0.13% to 7.71% ± 0.13% (P < 0.01) and from 23.9% ± 1.8% to 21.4% ± 1.9% (P < 0.01), respectively. Furthermore, switching from Lis to Glu improved patients’ treatment satisfaction; scores for 7 of the 8 items, such as “satisfaction” and “convenience” were significantly improved (P < 0.001), with no significant change in the scores for “improvement of hypoglycemia” (P = 0.91). Conclusions: Our present study suggests that switching bolus insulin from Lis to Glu by the addition of 1 unit of Glu per meal may be a useful treatment option for patients with inadequate glycemic control receiving intensive insulin therapy with Lis and Gla.
- Stamler, J., Vaccaro, O., Neaton, J.D. and Wentworth, D. (1993) Diabetes, Other Risk Factors, and 12-Yr Cardiovascular Mortality for Men Screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Diabetes Care, 16, 434-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.16.2.434
- Haffner, S.M., Lehto, S., Rönnemaa, T., Pyörälä, K. and Laakso, M. (1998) Mortality from Coronary Heart Disease in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes and in Nondiabetic Subjects with and without Prior Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine, 339, 229-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199807233390404
- The DECODE Study Group (1999) Glucose Tolerance and Mortality: Comparison of WHO and American Diabetes Association Diagnostic Criteria. The DECODE Study Group. European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative Analysis of Diagnostic Criteria in Europe. Lancet, 354, 617-621.
- Tominaga, M., Eguchi, H., Manaka, H., Igarashi, K., Kato, T. and Sekikawa, A. (1999) Impaired Glucose Tolerance Is a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease, But Not Impaired Fasting Glucose. The Funagata Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care, 22, 920-924. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.22.6.920
- Donahue, R.P., Abbott, R.D., Reed, D.M. and Yano, K. (1987) Postchallenge Glucose Concentration and Coronary Heart Disease in Men of Japanese Ancestry. Honolulu Heart Program. Diabetes, 36, 689-692. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diab.36.6.689
- 2011 Guideline for Management of PostMeal Glucose in Diabetes. www.idf.org
- Holman, R.R., Farmer, A.J., Davies, M.J., et al. (2009) Three-Year Efficacy of Complex Insulin Regimens in Type 2 Diabetes. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 1736-1747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0905479
- Daikubara, H., Kikuti, T. and Ishida, T. (2011) Shinyaku to Rinsho, 60, 758-765 (in Japanese).
- Pouwer, F., Snoek, F.J., van der Ploeg, H.M., Heine, R.J. and Brand, A.N. (1998) A Comparison of the Standard and the Computerized Versions of the Well-Being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Quality of Life Research, 7, 33-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008832821181
- Luzio, S., Peter, R., Dunseath, G.J., Mustafa, L. and Owens, D.R. (2008) A Comparison of Preprandial Insulin Glulisine versus Insulin Lispro in People with Type 2 Diabetes over a 12-h Period. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 79, 268-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2007.11.013