Assessment of the Podiatric Risk on Diabetics in Dakar Hospital Area: Cross-Sectional Study in Regard to 142 Patients
- 1 Internal Medicine/Endocrinology-Diabetology Department, Teaching Hospital of Pikine, Dakar, Senegal
- 2 Internal Medicine/Endocrinology-Diabetology Department, Teaching Hospital of Pikine, Dakar, Senegal
- 3 Internal Medicine/Endocrinology-Diabetology Department, Teaching Hospital of Pikine, Dakar, Senegal
- 4 Internal Medicine/Endocrinology-Diabetology Department, Teaching Hospital of Pikine, Dakar, Senegal
- 5 Internal Medicine/Endocrinology-Diabetology Department, Teaching Hospital of Pikine, Dakar, Senegal
- 6 Internal Medicine/Endocrinology-Diabetology Department, Teaching Hospital of Pikine, Dakar, Senegal
- 7 Internal Medicine/Endocrinology-Diabetology Department, Teaching Hospital of Pikine, Dakar, Senegal
- 8 Internal Medicine/Endocrinology-Diabetology Department, Teaching Hospital of Pikine, Dakar, Senegal
- 9 Internal Medicine/Endocrinology-Diabetology Department, Teaching Hospital of Pikine, Dakar, Senegal
- 10 Internal Medicine/Endocrinology-Diabetology Department, Teaching Hospital of Pikine, Dakar, Senegal
Abstract
The prevention of diabetic foot goes through a systematic podiatric assessment of diabetic patients permitting to identify the foot at risk. Then, we realized a study in the Internal Medicine Department at Pikine Teaching Hospital in Dakar with the assessment of foot risk on admitted diabetic patients as our main objective. Methods : It was about a prospective cross-sectional, descriptive and analytic study done on 18 months period. Results : Overall, 142 patients were gathered. The average age was 56 . 22 years and the sex-ratio was 0 . 67. 87.2% of the patients were running type 2 diabetes. The capillary blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin were respectively around 3 . 24 g/L and 9%. High Blood Pressure was found in 62% of cases. The type of footwear most used by our patients was sandals (96 . 3%). Also, 30 . 6% of patients walked barefoot. Prior ulceration and/or amputation were noted in 30% of cases. During the foot examination, a lesion was found in 15 . 5% of patients. Loss of monofilament sensitivity was about 66 . 7%. The Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) less than 0 . 9 was recorded in 34% of patients and at least a quarter of patients were posterior ly tibial pulselessness. The gradation of the foot risk according to the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) was established as follow: grade 0 (58%), grade 1 (9 . 8%), grade 2 (14 . 3%), grade 3 (17 . 3%). The presence of neuropathy (OR 12 . 162 [3 . 368 - 43 . 923]; p = 0 . 000), plantar keratosis (OR 2 . 87 [1 . 119 - 7 . 399]; p = 0 . 024) and the absence of pulse perception (OR 9 . 00 [3 . 205 - 25 . 414]; p = 0 . 000) were significant associated factors of foot injury occurrence on our patients. Conclusion : The prevention of diabetic foot in emerging countries is accessible by a systematic clinical examination of all diabetic feet and the awareness of adapted footwear.
- Dehayem, M.Y., Choukem, S.P. and Sobngwi, E. (2016) Offloading of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in Limited Resource Settings. Medecine des Maladies Metaboliques, 10, 555-559.
- Mbaye, N.M., Sarr, A., Diop, S.N., et al. (2008) Descriptive Study of Diabetic Foot at the Marc Sankale Diabetes Center. Dakar Medical, 53, 205-212.
- Bakker, K., Apelqvist, J., Lipsky, B.A. and Van Netten, J.J. (2016) The 2015 IWGDF Guidance Documents on Prevention and Management of Foot Problems in Diabetes: Development of an Evidence-Based Global Consensus. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 32, 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2694
- Apelqvist, J., Bakker, K., van Houtum, W.H., Schaper, N.C., on behalf of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) Editorial Board. (2008) Practical Guidelines on the Management and Prevention of the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 24, S181-S187. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.848
- Diop, S.N., Wade, A., Lokrou, A., et al. (2013) Management of Type 2 Diabetes in Clinical Practices in Sub-Saharan Africa: Results of the AMAR-AFO Study in Senegal and Ivory Cost. Medecine des Maladies Metaboliques, 7, 363-367.
- Ogbera, O.A., Osa, E., Edo, A., et al. (2008) Common Clinical Features of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Perspectives from a Developing Nation. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, 7, 93-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734608318236
- Hartemann, A., Lecornet-Sokol, E. and Halbron, M. (2010) Arteriopathy of the Lower Limbs and Diabetes. In: Monnier, L., Ed., Diabétologie, Elsevier Masson, Paris, 263-271.
- Feleh, E.E., Bchir, N., Jaidane, A., et al. (2017) Podiological Risk Assessment in Diabetic Patients. Annales d’Endocrinologie, 78, 431.
- Ndip, E.A., Tchakonte, B. and Mbanya, J.C. (2006) A Study of the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Foot Problems in a Population of Diabetic Patients in Cameroon. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, 5, 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734606288413
- Richard, J.L., Lavigne, J.P., Got, I., et al. (2011) Management of Patients Hospitalized for Diabetic Foot Infection: Results of the French OPIDIA Study. Diabetes & Metabolism, 37, 208-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2010.10.003
- Martini, J. (2008) Diabetic Foot: Detection and Prevention. La Revue de Médecine Interne, 29, S260-S263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0248-8663(08)73954-7
- Cheong, J., Alexiadou, K. and Devendra, S. (2017) Absent Monofilament Sensation in a Type 2 Diabetic Feet. London Journal of Primary Care (Abingdon), 9, 73-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2017.1370813