Simulation of Multi-Frequency Induced Currents in Biophysical Models and Agar Phantoms of Breast Cancer
- 1 Universidad del Ejército y FAM/EMGS-Laboratorio Multidisciplinario de Investigación, DF, México
- 2 Universidad del Ejército y FAM/EMGS-Laboratorio Multidisciplinario de Investigación, DF, México
- 3 Universidad del Ejército y FAM/EMGS-Laboratorio Multidisciplinario de Investigación, DF, México
- 4 Universidad del Ejército y FAM/EMGS-Laboratorio Multidisciplinario de Investigación, DF, México
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most frequent malignant neoplasm and the leading cause of cancer death in women in the world. Early detection techniques have been proposed on the basis of bioelectrical measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate analytically and experimentally the inductive phase shift as a function of multi-frequency induced currents in breast cancer conditions. Virtual simulation by biophysical models and experimental measurements by magnetic induction in agar phantoms were developed to estimate the inductive phase shift as a function of the bulk electrical properties in typical breast volumes with tumors in specific positions. The analytical and experimental results are qualitatively consistent and provide evidence that the inductive phase shift has a potential clinical value to detect cancerous tumors toward inside a typical volume of breast tissue.
- J. Stagg, R. W. Johnstone and M. J. Smyth, “From Cancer Immunosurveillance to Cancer Immunotherapy,” Immunological Reviews, Vol. 220, No. 1, 2007, pp. 82-101. doi:10.1111/j.1600-065X.2007.00566.x
- F. M. Knaul, G. Nigenda, R. Lozano, et al., “Breast Cancer in Mexico: A Pressing Priority,” Reproductive Health Matters, Vol. 16, No. 32, 2008, pp. 113-123.
- World Health Organization, “Breast Cancer: Prevention and Control,” 23 April 2012. www.who.int/topics/cancer/breastcancer/es/index1.html
- H. Scharfetter, W. Ninaus, B. Puswald, G. I. Petrova, D. Kovachev and H. Hutten, “Inductively Coupled Wideband Transceiver for Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (IBIS),” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 873, 1999, pp. 322-334. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09480.x
- J. C. Newell, P. M. Edic, X. Ren, J. L. Larson-Wisemanand and M. D. Danyleiko, “Assessment of Acute Pulmonary Edema in Dogs by Electrical Impedance Imaging,” IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 43, No. 2, 1996, pp. 133-138. doi:10.1109/10.481982
- D. S. Holder, C. A. Gonzalez-Correa, T. Tidswell, A. Gibson, G. Gusick and R. H. Bayford, “Assessment and Calibration of a Low-Frequency System for Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT), Optimized for Use in Imaging Brain Function in Ambulant Human Subjects,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 873, 1999, pp. 512-519. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09500.x
- H. Griffiths, W. R. Steward and W. Gough, “Magnetic Induction Tomography—A Measuring System for Biological Materials,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 873, 1999. 335-345 doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09481.x
- H. Griffiths, “Magnetic Induction Tomography,” Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 12, No. 8, 2001, pp. 1126-1131. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/12/8/319
- S. Watson, R. J. Williams, W. A. Gough and H. Griffiths, “A Magnetic Induction Tomography System for Samples with Conductivities Less than 10 s?m?1,” Measurement Science and Technology, 2008, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 55015511. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/19/4/045501
- S. Al-Zeiback and N. H. Saunders, “A Feasability Study of in vivo Electromagnetic Imaging,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 38, No. 1, 1993, pp. 151-160. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/38/1/011
- A. V. Korzhenevskii and V. A. Cherepenin, “Magnetic Induction Tomography,” Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics, Vol. 42, No. 4, 1997, pp. 469474.