Generalization of the Second Order Vector Potential Formulation for Arbitrary Non-Orthogonal Curvilinear Coordinates Systems from the Covariant Form of Maxwell's Equations
- 1 CEA, LIST, F-91191 Gif sur Yvette CEDEX, France.
Abstract
A great number of semi-analytical models, notably the representation of electromagnetic fields by integral equations are based on the second order vector potential (SOVP) formalism which introduces two scalar potentials in order to obtain analytical expressions of the electromagnetic fields from the two potentials. However, the scalar decomposition is often known for canonical coordinate systems. This paper aims in introducing a specific SOVP formulation dedicated to arbitrary non-orthogonal curvilinear coordinates systems. The electromagnetic field representation which is derived in this paper constitutes the key stone for the development of semi-analytical models for solving some eddy currents moelling problems and electromagnetic radiation problems considering at least two homogeneous media separated by a rough interface. This SOVP formulation is derived from the tensor formalism and Maxwell’s equations written in a non-orthogonal coordinates system adapted to a surface characterized by a 2D arbitrary aperiodic profile.
- C. V. Dodd and W. E. Deeds, “Analytical Solutions to Eddy Current Probe-Coil Problems,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 39, No. 6, 1968, pp. 2829-2838.
- J. A. Tegopoulos and E. E. Kriezis, “Eddy Currents in Linear Conducting Media,” El-sevier, New York, 1985.
- J. R. Bowler, “Eddy Current Calculations Using Half- Space Green’s Functions,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 61, No. 3, 1987, pp. 833-839.
- S. K. Burke, “Eddy-Current Induction in a Uniaxially Anisotropic Plate,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 68, No. 1, 1990, pp. 3080-3090.
- J. R. Bowler, L. D. Sabbagh and H. A. Sab-bagh, “A Theoretical and Computational Model of Eddy Current Probes Incorporating Volume Integral and Conjuguate Gradient Methods,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1989, pp. 2650-2664.
- J. R. Bowler, S. A. Jenkins, L. D. Sabbagh and H. A. Sabbagh, “Eddy Current Probe Impedance due to a Volumetric Aw,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 70, No. 3, 1991, pp. 1107-1114.
- S. M. Nair and J. H. Rose, “Electromagnetic Induction (Eddy Currents) in a Conducting Half-Space in the Absence and Presence of Inhomogeneities: A New Formalism,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 68, No. 12, 1990, pp. 5995-6009.
- C. Reboud, G. Pichenot, D. Premel and R. Raillon, “2008 ECT Benchmark Results: Modeling with Civa of 3D Flaws Responses in Planar and Cylindrical Work Pieces,” Proceedings of the 35th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Chicago, 20-25 July 2008, pp. 1915-1921.
- Extende. http://www.extende.com
- D. Prémel (é not e), “Computation of a Quasi-Static Induced by Two Long Straight Parallel Wires in a Conductor with a Rough Surface,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Vol. 41, No. 24, 2008, 12 p.
- W. R. Smythe, “Static and Dynamic Electricity,” McGraw- Hill, New York, 1950.
- P. M. Morse and H. Feshbach, “Methods of Theoretical Physics,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953.
- L. P. Felsen and N. Marcuvitz, “Radiation and Scattering of Waves,” IEEE Press, Piscataway, 1994.
- P. Hammond, “Use of Potentials in Calculation of Electromagnetic. Physical Science, Measurement and Instrumentation, Management and Education—Reviews,” IEEE Proceedings A, Vol. 129, No. 2, 1982, pp. 106-112.
- T. Theodoulidis, “Analytical Modeling of Wobble in Eddy Current Tube Testing with Bobbin Coils,” Research in Nondestructive Evaluation, New York, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2002, pp. 111-126.