Exploring Enablers and Barriers to Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Management Technologies Adoption in the Kingdom of Bahrain
- 1 Department of Natural Recourses & Environment, Arabian Gulf University, Salmaniya, Manama, Bahrain
- 2 Sustainable Material and Manufacturing Group, WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- 3 Supply Chain and Logistics, WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Abstract
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) becomes a point of focus globally due to its harmful effects on the environment and human health if it is not managed properly. MSW was proved globally to be used as a resource, and it has a major opportunity in the realm of conversion technologies. Accordingly, this study aims to explore the enablers and barriers to six different MSW management (MSWM) technologies adopted in the Kingdom of Bahrain, in order to ensure the successful adoption of these technologies that are Anaerobic Digestion (AD), Incineration, Pyrolysis, Gasification, Composting and Refused Derived Fuel (RDF). This study provides sufficient information to the decision and policy-makers for the processes of selection and adoption of the MSWM technologies in Bahrain, using a qualitative approach “mainly semi-structured interviews” with experts and then Thematic Analysis using nvivo12 software. The results show that the main themes that enablers and barriers fall under are: political (e.g. national waste management strategy), technical (e.g. segregation at source), managerial (e.g. capacity building), social (e.g. public awareness), economic (e.g. incentives to investment) and environmental (e.g. air quality). This study concluded that in order to succeed in the MSWM technologies adoption, the resulted barriers should be overcome. Furthermore, Incineration was recommended as the best solution to manage MSW which has the least barriers and most enablers in Bahrain as per the experts.
- UNEP (2017) United Nations Environment Assembly of the United Nations Environment Programme. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/25384/Quarterly%20Report%20to% 20the%20CPR.pdf?sequence=54&isAllowed=y
- Al-Ansari, M.S. (2012) Improving Solid Waste Management in Gulf Co-Operation Council States: Developing Integrated Plans to Achieve Reduction in Greenhouse Gases. Modern Applied Science, 6, 60-68. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v6n2p60
- Eco-Waste (2018) GCC Waste to Energy Report towards a Zero-Waste Society. https://www.ecowaste.ae/__media/GCC-Waste-to-Energy-2018.pdf
- Zafar, S. (2016) Overview of Composting Methods. Ecomena. https://www.ecomena.org/composting-methods
- ElQuliti, S. (2016) Techno-Economical Feasibility Study of Waste-to-Energy Using Pyrolysis Technology for Jeddah Municipal Solid Waste. International Journal on Power Engineering and Energy, 7, 622-635.
- Williams, P.T. (2005) Waste Treatment and Disposal. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470012668
- Atkin, D., Chaudhry, A., Chaudry, S., Khanelwal, A. and Verhoogen, E. (2017) Organizational Barriers to Technology Adoption Evidence from Soccer-Ball Producers in Pakistan. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132, 1101-1164. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx010
- Al-Senaidi, S., Lin, L. and Poirot, J. (2009) Barriers to Adopting Technology for Teaching and Learning in Oman. Computer and Education, 53, 575-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.015
- Jesson, J., Pocock, R. and Stone, I. (2014) Barriers to Recycling: A Review of Evidence since 2008. The Waste & Resources Action Programme: Banbury.
- Luken, R. and Rompy, F. (2008) Drivers for and Barriers to Environmentally Sound Technology Adoption by Manufacturing Plants in Nine Developing Countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, S67-S77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.006
- McNiff, K. (2016) Thematic Analysis of Interview Data: 6 Ways NVivo Can Help. http://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo/nvivo-community/blog/thematic-analysis-interview-data-nvivo
- Mutz, D., Hengevoss, D., Hugi, C.M. and Gross, T. (2017) Waste-to-Energy Options in Municipal Solid Waste Management. A Guide for Decision Makers in Developing and Emerging Countries. Eschborn.
- Buetow, S. (2010) Thematic Analysis and Its Reconceptualization as “Saliency Analysis”. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 15, 123-125. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009081