Satisfaction with the Environmental Condition in the Italian Regions between 2004 and 2020
- 1 LUM University-Giuseppe Degennaro, Casamassima, Italy
- 2 LUM University-Giuseppe Degennaro, Casamassima, Italy
- 3 LUM Enterprise S.R.L., Casamassima, Italy
Abstract
In the following article, the “ Satisfaction with the Environmental Condition ” in the 20 Italian regions between 2004 and 2020 was estimated using ISTAT-BES data. The data were analyzed using the following econometric techniques, namely: Panel Data with Random Effects, Panel Data with Fixed Effects, Dynamic Panel, Pooled OLS, WLS. The results show that satisfaction with the environmental situation is positively associated with the following variables “ People with at least high school diploma ”, “ Satisfaction with leisure time ”, “ Concern for the deterioration of the landscape ” and negatively associated with “ Gross disposable income per capita ”, “ Dissatisfaction with the landscape of the place of life ”, “ Perception of the risk of crime ”. A cluster analysis was then carried out using the unsupervised k-Means algorithm optimized through the Silhouette coefficient and 3 clusters were found. A comparative analysis was then carried out between eight different machine learning algorithms to predict the trend of satisfaction by environmental situation. The analysis showed that the Tree Ensemble Regression algorithm is the best predictor and estimates a reduction of the variable of 0.05%. Subsequently, using augmented data, a further prediction was made with an estimated result equal to -1.93%.
- Tsurumi, T. and Managi, S. (2015) Environmental Value of Green Spaces in Japan: An Application of the Life Satisfaction Approach. Ecological Economics, 120, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.023
- Ambrey, C.L. and Fleming, C.M. (2011) The Influence of the Natural Environment and Climate on Life Satisfaction in Australia. 55th Annual AARES National Conference, Melbourne, 9-11 February 2011, 1-37.
- Ambrey, C. and Fleming, C. (2014) Public Greenspace and Life Satisfaction in Urban Australia. Urban Studies, 51, 1290-1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494417
- de Oliveira, A., Santos, G. and Santos Lobo, H. (2021) Environmental Attitudes and Tourist Satisfaction in Overloaded Natural Protected Areas. Journal of Travel Research, 60, 1667-1676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520957419
- Frey, B.S., Luechinger, S. and Stutzer, A. (2010) The Life Satisfaction Approach to Environmental Valuation. The Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2, 139-160. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.resource.012809.103926
- Chen, L., Zhang, J. and You, Y. (2020) Air Pollution, Environmental Perceptions, and Citizen Satisfaction: A Mediation Analysis. Environmental Research, 184, Article ID: 109287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109287
- Senlier, N., Yildiz, R. and Aktaş, E.D. (2009) A Perception Survey for the Evaluation of Urban Quality of Life in Kocaeli and a Comparison of the Life Satisfaction with the European Cities. Social Indicators Research, 94, 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9361-1
- Wang, R., et al. (2021) Are Greenspace Quantity and Quality Associated with Mental Health through Different Mechanisms in Guangzhou, China: A Comparison Study Using Street View Data. Environmental Pollution, 290, Article ID: 117976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117976
- Rajani, N.B., Skianis, V. and Filippidis, F.T. (2019) Association of Environmental and Sociodemographic Factors with Life Satisfaction in 27 European Countries. BMC Public Health, 19, Article No. 534. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6886-y
- McCormack, G.R., Rock, M., Toohey, A.M. and Hignell, D. (2010) Characteristics of Urban Parks Associated with Park Use and Physical Activity: A Review of Qualitative Research. Health and Place, 16, 712-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.003
- Wu, G., Zheng, X. and Wang, Y. (2020) The Impact of Tourists’ Environmental and Climate Satisfaction on Environmental Restoring Awareness in Seashore Tourist Resort. Journal of Coastal Research, 115, 208-210. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCR-SI115-065.1