This study aims to generate data which can be used as a potential starting point for the updating of the Philippine Water Quality Criteria and the determination of the true impact of land use to the fecal contamination of the Pampanga River Basin (PRB), the largest subwatershed of Manila Bay. Levels of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) were determined in the selected tributaries of the PRB, representing three land use categories, namely, the forest/woodland (control), agricultural and residential lands. FIB were quantified in order to investigate the potential contribution of the selected areas in the fecal contamination of the PRB. The study was conducted in 2021 covering March, May, June, July, and September to represent the dry (March and May) and wet (June, July, and September) seasons. Counts of FIB, namely thermotolerant coliform, E. coli , and enterococci were qualitatively correlated with the results of the ocular survey and key informant interview based on known fecal contributors and their relevant rainfall data. FIB counts of water bodies in the selected agricultural and residential land use categories had Geometric Mean (GM) counts that are statistically greater than those of bodies of water near the representative forest/woodland (control), and exceeded the acceptable GM limits for all FIB, regardless of the season. Notably, the GM values recorded for the waters near the selected forest/woodland (control) passed the water quality criteria for all measured FIB parameters for both seasons. Furthermore, enterococci levels in the control site were statistically lower during the wet season. These initial findings suggest that agricultural and residential land use categories could be major contributors to the unacceptable water quality of tributaries of the Pampanga River Basin. The prevalence of thermotolerant coliforms and E. coli was noted regardless of rainfall and land use, indicating these FIB may not be adequate as water quality indicators. With their ability to survive and persist in fecally contaminated sediments in water bodies and in nutrient-poor environments, enterococci could be more definitive indicators of fecal contamination and microbiological quality of environmental waters.
Bureau of Soils and Water Management (BSWM) (2012) Assessment of Non-Point Source Pollution from Croplands of Manila Bay System. Bureau of Soils and Water Management—Department of Agriculture, Quezon City, Philippines, 135 p.
Department of Environment and National Resources—Manila Bay Coordinating Office (DENR-MBCO) & National Mapping and Resource Information Authority (NAMRIA) (2015) Manila Bay Area Environmental Atlas. 2nd Edition, Manila Bay Coordinating Office and the National Mapping and Resource Information Authority, Quezon City, Philippines, 250 p.
National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) (2022) Manila Bay Sustainable Development Master Plan: Action Plan and Investment Report. http://mbsdmp.com/download/apir-feb-2022_cddf2d7c909bbe451fd24a3b98293008.pdf
Department of Environment and National Resources—River Basin Control Office (DENR-RBCO) (n.d.) Pampanga River Basin. https://riverbasin.denr.gov.ph/river/pampanga
BSWM (2013) Application of Stable Isotopes to the Assessment of Pollution Loading from Various Sources in the Pampanga River System into the Manila Bay, Philippines. Bureau of Soils and Water Management—Department of Agriculture, Quezon City, Philippines, 164 p.
Boehm, A.B. and Sassoubre, L.M. (2014) Enterococci as Indicators of Environmental Fecal Contamination. In: Gilmore, M.S., Clewell, D.B., Ike, Y., et al., Eds., Enterococci: From Commensals to Leading Causes of Drug Resistant Infection, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, 1-18. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK190421/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK190421.pdf
American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Environment Federation (WEF) (2017) Standard Methods 9221: Multiple Tube Fermentation Technique for Members of the Coliform Group. In: Rice, E.W., Baird, R.B., Eaton, A.D. and Clesceri, L.S., Eds., Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association, U.S.A., 9-68-9-78.
American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Environment Federation (WEF) (2017) Standard Methods 9223: Enzyme-Substrate Coliform Test. In: Rice, E.W., Baird, R.B., Eaton, A.D. and Clesceri, L.S., Eds., Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association, U.S.A., 9-98-9-102.
American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Environment Federation (WEF) (2017) Standard Methods 9230: Fecal Enterococcus/Streptococcus Groups. In: Rice, E.W., Baird, R.B., Eaton, A.D. and Clesceri, L.S., Eds., Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association, U.S.A., 9-117-9-119 (9230B) and 9-122-9-123 (9230D)
Geometric Mean
Land Use
Arceo, A. (2021) Pagasa Declares Start of Philippines’ 2021 Rainy Season. https://www.rappler.com/nation/weather/pagasa-rainy-season-philippines-2021
Department of Environment and National Resources—Environmental Management Bureau (DENR-EMB) (2016) DENR-DAO No. 2016-08: Water Quality Guidelines and General Effluent Standards of 2016. https://server2.denr denr.gov.ph/uploads/rmdd/dao-2016-08.pdf
United Stated Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2012) Recreational Water Quality Criteria. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/rwqc2012.pdf
WHO (2021) Guidelines on Recreational Water Quality Volume 1: Coastal and Fresh Waters. World Health Organization, Geneva, 138 p. https://www. who.int/publications/i/item/9789240031302.
Byappanahalli, M.N., Nevers, M.B., Korajkic, A., Staley, Z.R. and Harwood, V.J. (2012) Enterococci in the Environment. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 76, 685-706. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00023-12
Ragosta, G., Evensen, C., Atwill, E.R., Walker, M., Ticktin, T. Asquith, A. and Tate, K.W. (2010) Causal Connections between Water Quality and Land Use in a Rural Tropical Island Watershed. Eco-Health, 7, 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-010-0299-9
Rochelle-Newall, E., Nguyen, T.M.H., Le, T.P.Q., Sengtaheuanghoung, O. and Ribolzi, O. (2015) A Short Review of Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Tropical Aquatic Ecosystems: Knowledge Gaps and Future Directions. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, Article 308. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00308
Devane, M.L., Moriarty, E., Weaver, L., Cookson, A. and Gilpin, B. (2020) Fecal Indicator Bacteria from Environmental Sources; Strategies for Identification to Improve Water Quality Monitoring. Water Research, 185, Article ID: 116204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116204
Haller, L., Amedegnato, E., Poté, J. and Wildi, W. (2009) Influence of Freshwater Sediment Characteristics on Persistence of Fecal Indicator Bacteria. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 203, 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0005-0
del Mar Lleò, M., Bonato, B., Benedetti, D. and Canepari, P. (2005) Survival of Enterococcal Species in Aquatic Environments. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 54, 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2005.03.016
Sinton, L.W., Hall, C.H., Lynch, P.A. and Davis-Colley, R.J. (2002) Sunlight Inactivation of Fecal Indicator Bacteria and Bacteriophages from Waste Stabilization Pond Effluent in Fresh and Saline Waters. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 1122-1131. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.3.1122-1131.2002
Berg, G., Dahling, D.R., Brown, G.A. and Berman, D. (1978) Validity of Fecal Coliforms, Total Coliforms, and Fecal Streptococci as Indicators of Viruses in Chlorinated Primary Sewage Effluents. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 36, 880-884. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.36.6.880-884.1978
Sinclair, J.L. and Alexander, M. (1984) Role of Resistance to Starvation in Bacterial Survival in Sewage and Lake Water. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 48, 3041-3048. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.48.2.410-415.1984
Davies, C.M., Long, J.A.H., Donald, M. and Ashbolt, N.J. (1995) Survival of Fecal Microorganisms in Marine and Freshwater Sediments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61, 1888-1896. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.5.1888-1896.1995
Macalalad, R.V., Badilla, R.A., Cabrera, O.C. and Bagtasa, G. (2021) Hydrological Response of the Pampanga River Basin in the Philippines to Intense Tropical Cyclone Rainfall. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 22, 781-794. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-20-0184.1
Isobe, K.O., Tarao, M., Chiem, N.H., Minh, L.Y. and Takada, H. (2004) Effect of Environmental Factors on the Relationship between Concentrations of Coprostanol and Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Tropical (Mekong Delta) and Temperate (Tokyo) Freshwaters. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70, 814-821. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.2.814-821.2004
Flint, K.P. (1987) The Long-Term Survival of E. coli in River Water. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 63, 261-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1987.tb04945.x
Hazen, T.C. (1988) Fecal Coliforms as Indicators in Tropical Waters: A Review. Toxicity Assessment, 3, 461-477. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.2540030504
Ishii, S. and Sadowsky, M.J. (2008) Escherichia coli in the Environment: Implications for Water Quality and Human Health. Microbes and Environments, 23, 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.23.101
Young, K.D. (2006) The Selective Value of Bacterial Shape. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 70, 660-703. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00001-06
Goto, D.K. and Yan, T. (2011) Effects of Land Uses on Fecal Indicator Bacteria in the Water and Soil of a Tropical Watershed. Microbes and Environments, 26, 254-260. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME11115
Larned, S.T., Scarsbrook, M.R., Snelder, T.H., Norton, N.J. and Biggs, B.J.F. (2004) Water Quality in Low-Elevation Streams and Rivers of New Zealand: Recent State and Trends in Contrasting Land-Cover Classes. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 38, 347-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2004.9517243
Aitken, M.N. (2003) Impact of Agricultural Practices and River Catchment Characteristics on River and Bathing Water Quality. Water Science & Technology, 48, 217-224. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2003.0577