Implications of <i>de Facto</i> Reuse on Future Regulatory Developments for Beaufort-Jasper Water & Sewer Authority in Okatie, South Carolina, USA
- 1 Department of Technology and Innovation, Beaufort-Jasper Water & Sewer Authority, Okatie, SC, USA
- 2 Department of Research and Innovation, Brown and Caldwell, Charlotte, NC, USA
- 3 Department of Digital Solutions, Brown and Caldwell, Cleveland, OH, USA
- 4 Department of Research and Innovation, Brown and Caldwell, Nashville, TN, USA
Abstract
A significant portion of the national water supply can be attributed to de facto or unplanned potable reuse, though the extent of its contribution is difficult to estimate. Fortunately, the contribution of Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) effluent to waters that supply drinking water treatment plants has been documented by some communities. In the United States (US), among the top 25 most impacted drinking water treatment plants by upstream WRRF, 16% of the influent flow to the drinking water treatment plant under average streamflow and up to 100% under low-flow conditions is WRRF effluent. Currently, the full extent of de facto reuse in the US may be much higher because of population growth. The scenario is no different for Beaufort-Jasper Water and Sewer Authority (BJWSA) in South Carolina, US, with contributions to the Savannah River originating from numerous WRRF and other upstream dischargers. South Carolina coastal utilities such as BJSWA are considering direct and indirect potable reuse options, driven by disposal limitations and challenges. Currently, South Carolina does not have a framework, guidelines, or regulations for reuse, but discussions have started among the regulated community. In addition to understanding the extent of de facto reuse, the state will need to develop standards and best practices to enable future adoption of planned potable reuse solutions to water resources challenges. Such guidance should address human health risk management and technical considerations regarding treatment in addition to other factors, including source control, storage, fail-safe operation, monitoring, non-cost factors, and public acceptance. This study conducted a mapping assessment specific to BJWSA, sampled at four locations on Savannah River, and observed that de facto reuse is approximately 4.6% to 5.9% during low-flow months and is within the range generally observed nationwide. When coupled with evidence that planned potable reuse can improve human health and environmental risks, this practice is a meaningful option in the water supply portfolio for many utilities.
- Drewes, J.E., Hübner, U., Zhiteneva, V. and Karakurt, S. (2017) Characterization of Unplanned Water Reuse in the EU. Final Report, European Commission DG Environment, Brussels.
- National Research Council (2012) Water Reuse: Potential for Expanding the Nation’s Water Supply through Reuse of Municipal Wastewater. The National Academies Press, Washington DC.
- Rice, J. and Westerhoff, P. (2015) Spatial and Temporal Variation in de Facto Wastewater Reuse in Drinking Water Systems across the U.S.A. Environmental Science & Technology, 49, 982-989. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5048057
- USEPA (1982) Report of Workshop Proceedings, Protocol Development: Criteria and Standards for Potable Reuse and Feasible Alternatives. USEPA, Washington DC.
- Rice, J., Wutich, A. and Westerhoff, P. (2013) Assessment of de Facto Wastewater Reuse across the U.S.: Trends between 1980 and 2008. Environmental Science & Technology, 47, 11099-11105. https://doi.org/10.1021/es402792s
- USEPA (1998) Series 810—Product Performance Test Guidelines. https://www.epa.gov/test-guidelines-pesticides-and-toxic-substances/series-810-product-performance-test-guidelines
- Environment Protection and Heritage Council (2006) Australian Guidelines for Water Recycling: Augmentation of Drinking Water Supplies. Environment Protection and Heritage Council, Canberra.
- Bell, K. and D’Silva, A. (2016) Direct Potable Reuse and the Intersection of the Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Act. In: Water Environment Federation.
- USEPA (2012) Guidelines for Water Reuse. USEPA, Washington DC.
- Wells, M.J.M., Mullins, G.A., Bell, K.Y., Da Silva, A.K. and Navarrete, E.M. (2017) Fluorescence and Quenching Assessment (EEM-PARAFAC) of de Facto Potable Reuse in the Neuse River, North Carolina, United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 51, 13592-13602. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03766
- State of Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division (2022) Guidelines for Water Reclamation and Urban Water Reuse, Atlanta, GA.
- Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division (2022) Water Quality in Georgia, 2020-2021.
- Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (2018) TDEC Infrastructure Working Group. Tennessee’s Roadmap to Securing the Future of Our Water Resources.