Leachate Quality Characteristics: A Case Study of Two Industrial Solid Waste Dumpsites
- 1 Department of Chemistry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
- 2 Department of Chemistry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Abstract
The study evaluates the associated environmental risk of two industrial solid waste dumpsites. The Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) and American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) extraction test were used to characterize leachate quality on six solid waste samples obtained in July 2005, March 2006 and July 2006. Solid waste compositions varied with 58% metal scraps, 30% vegetation matter, 10% plastics and 2% paper materials. Statistical T-test (95% confidence limit) showed no significance difference in physico-chemical quality of the leachates obtained by both methods from both sites. Leachates obtained by the TCLP extraction accounted for a total of 92.4% of the overall metal load as against 6.01% for the ASTM method. This disparity is due to the acidic nature of the TCLP procedure which enhances more efficient extraction of metals than the ASTM method. Solid waste deposits at SITE-1 w ere considered hazardous to the environment, given that the upper 90% UCL values for lead exceeded the TCLP characteristic regulatory levels. These may pose a risk to vegetations and ground water reserve within the vicinity of the dumpsite on the long run. The risk may be such as bioaccumulation of lead in the food chain. Therefore, constant monitoring and possible remediation measures should be carried out to contained contamination.
- T. H. Christensen, P. Kjeldsen, P. L. Bjerg, D. L. Jensen, J. B. Christensen and A. Baun, “Biogeochemistry of Landfill Leachate Plumes,” Applied Geochemistry, Vol. 16, No. 7-8, 2001, pp. 659-718. doi:10.1016/S0883-2927(00)00082-2
- D. Fatta, A. Papadopoulos and M. Loizidou, “A Study on the Landfill Leachate and Its Impact on the Groundwater Quality of the Greater Area,” Environmental Geochemistry and Health, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1999, pp. 175-190. doi:10.1023/A:1006613530137
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (USE PA), Office of Drinking Water, “A Ground Water Protection Strategy for the Environmental Protection Agency,” United State Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 1984, p. 64.
- J. Saarela, “Pilot Investigations of Surface Parts of Three Closed Landfills and Factors Affecting Them,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 84, No. 1-2, 2003, pp. 183-192. doi:10.1023/A:1022859718865
- H. Moo-Young, B. Johnson, A. Johnson, D. Carson, C. Lew, S. Liu and K. Hancock, “Characterization of Infiltration Rates from Landfills: Supporting Groundwater Modeling Efforts,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 96, No. 1-3, 2004, pp. 283-311. doi:10.1023/B:EMAS.0000031734.67778.d7
- S. C. Stark, I. Snape, N. J. Graham, J. C. Brennan and D. B. Gore, “Assessment of Metal Concentration Using X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry and the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) during Remediation of a Waste Disposal Site in Antarctica,” Journal of Environmental Monitoring, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2008, pp. 60-70. doi:10.1039/b712631j
- A. O. Aderemi, A. V. Oriaku, G. A. Adewumi and A. A. Otitoloju, “Assessment of Groundwater Contamination by Leachate near a Municipal Solid Waste Landfill,” African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 11, 2011, pp. 933-940.
- S. Mor, K. Ravindra, R. P. Dahiya and A. Chandra, “Leachate Characterization and Assessment of Groundwater Pollution near Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Site,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 4, 2006, pp. 325-334.
- T. Timothy, J. Youg-Chul and T. Thabet, “A Guide to the Use of Leaching Test in Solid Waste Management Decision Making,” Report #03-01(A), The Florida Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management, Gainesville, 2003, pp. 12-37.
- R. S. Al-Abed, L. Philip, G. Hageman, N. M. Jegadeesan and A. Derrick, “Comparative Evaluation of Short-Term Leach Test for Heavy Metal Release from Mineral Processing Waste,” Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 364, No. 1-3, 2006, pp. 14-23. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.10.021