A Note: De-Growth Debate and New Scientific Analysis of Economic Growth
- 1 Finland Futures Research Centre, Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Tampere, Finland
- 2 Finland Futures Research Centre, Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Tampere, Finland
- 3 Finland Futures Research Centre, Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Tampere, Finland
Abstract
This article is a theoretical note on de-growth debate. The article includes an analysis of economic growth and alternative growth paths. The article is focused on the concepts of de-linking, re-linking and de-growth. We connected linking analysis (de-linking and re-linking) analytically to the de-growth debate. On the basis of our framework, special cases of de-growth in the linking process relate to strong re-linking, weak re-linking and recessive de-linking. This kind of theoretical approach helps us to define the special nature of de-growth. Key finding of us is that only the de-growth case of recessive de-linking meets the condition of environmental sustainability. However, this case does not fulfil the criteria of sustainable development defined in the WCSD context. In the linking process, the WCSD conditions of sustainable development are met in the strong de-linking process only. In our analytical framework, the theoretical concepts of de-growth and sustainable development seem to conflict by definition.
- Kallis, G. (2011) In Defence of Degrowth. Ecological Economics, 70, 873-880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007
- Wallerstein, I. (2010) Structural Crises. New Left Review, 62, 133-142.
- Martinez-Alier, J. (2009) Socially Sustainable Economic De-Growth. Development and Change, 40, 1099-1119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01618.x
- Kaivo-oja, J. (1999) Alternative Scenarios of Social Development: Is Analytical Sustainability Policy Analysis Possible? How? Sustainable Development, 7, 140-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1719(199908)7:3 3.0.CO;2-I
- Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F.S., Lambin, E.F., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H.J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C.A., Hughes, T., vander Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sorlin, S., Snyder, P.K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R.W., Fabry, V., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P. and Foley, J.A. (2009) A Safe operating Space for Humanity. Nature, 461, 472-475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/461472a
- Smith, R. (2010) Beyond Growth or Beyond Capitalism? Real World Economics Review, 53, 28-36.
- Kallis, G., Kerschner, C. and Martinez-Alier, J. (2012) The Economics of Degrowth. Ecological Economics, 84, 172-180.
- Victor, P.A. (2008) Managing without Growth: Slower By Design, Not Disaster. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781848442993
- Vehmas, J., Luukkanen, J. and Kaivo-oja, J. (2007) Linking Analyses and Environmental Kuznets Curves for Aggregated Material Flows in the EU. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1662-1673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.010
- van den Bergh, J. (2011) Environment versus Growth. A Criticism of “Degrowth” and a Plea for A-Growth. Ecological Economics, 70, 881-890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.035
- de Bruyn, S.M. and Opschoor, J.B. (1997) Developments in the Throughput-Income Relationship: Theoretical and Empirical Observations. Ecological Economics, 20, 255-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00086-9
- de Bruyn, S.M. (2000) Economic Growth and the Environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrect.
- Magnani, E. (2001) The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Development Path or Policy Result? Environmental Modelling & Software, 16, 157-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00079-7