Modelling Dust Emissions from a Source Using Dust Monitoring and Meteorological Data
- 1 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
- 2 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
- 3 DustScan Ltd, Oxford, UK
- 4 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
Abstract
This paper describes a study into the development of more robust dust emission factors by means of dust and meteorological monitoring. Emission factors for nuisance dusts in the literature are scarce, with estimates of dust output given for many processes in mass per unit area per year. Temporal variations and the extent and conditions in which maximum concentrations occur can therefore be impossible to predict with any accuracy. This investigation aims to improve predic-tions by “back calculating” emission levels based on dust monitoring around known dust sources. Nuisance dust and meteorological monitoring has been undertaken at a sand and gravel quarry in the UK for a consecutive period of two years. Sticky pad directional dust monitors were used to collect dust at eight locations at and around the site with meteorological data collected at an elec-tronic weather station within the site. Air quality modelling software (ADMS) was used to test emission factors from the European Environment Agency (EEA) and the US Environmental Protec-tion Agency (EPA) for emissions from mineral workings. Predictions were compared with the dust monitoring data to assess accuracy, with results showing limited poor correspondence (r<sup>2</sup> < 0.3). Trends showed that emission predictions were poorest in winter; this is likely because most emis-sion calculations are not weather dependent and seasonal fluctuations will occur. Dust emission rate calculations were altered with respect to the dust monitoring data for one monitoring location on the mineral site boundary and the model was run again. Results were then tested at two different locations up to 200 m from the site boundary, with very positive correlations (r<sup>2</sup > 0.89) and similar maximum concentrations (<5% difference). This study has therefore shown that ac-curate site-specific emission rates can be produced in combination with site boundary sticky pad dust monitoring in order to accurately derive estimations elsewhere.
- BSI (1994) BS 6069 Part 2. Characterisation of Air Quality, Part 2, Glossary. British Standards Institution, London.
- Institute of Air Quality Management (IAQM) (2012) Guidance on Air Quality Monitoring in the Vicinity of Demolition and Construction Sites. Institute of Environmental Sciences, London.
- Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2012) National Planning Policy Framework (NPFF). HMSO, London.
- Minerals Industry Research Organisation (2011) Good Practice Guide: Control and Measurement of Nuisance Dust and PM10 from the Extractive Industries. AEA Technology, Oxford.
- Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants (CERC) (2015) ADMS 5. http://www.cerc.co.uk/environmental-software/ADMS-model.html
- European Environment Agency (2013) EMEP/EEA Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook. EEA, Denmark.
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2006) AP42: 13.2.4 Aggregate Handling and Storage Piles. EPA, Washington DC.
- Goosens, D. and Offer, Z.Y. (2000) Wind Tunnel and Field Calibration of Six Aeolian Dust Samplers. Atmospheric Environment, 34, 1043-1057. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00376-3
- Datson, H. (2010) The Development of a New Protocol for Directional Dust Monitoring. PhD Thesis, University of Leeds, UK.
- Bruce, J., Datson, H., Smith, J. and Fowler, M. (2015) Characterisation and Modelling of Dust in a Semi-Arid Construction Environment. In: O’Sullivan, G. and Megson, D., Eds., Environemntal Forensics: Proceedings of the 2014 INEF Conference, Special Publication, The Royal Society of Chemistry, London.