This paper is a historical overview of the development of visual impact assessment (VIA) methodology as implemented by US Federal agencies from the 1960s until the current time. VIA methods are to be used as part of environmental impact assessment for projects which could have significant impact on landscape aesthetics. Also included are methodological challenges with current large-scale renewable energy development in the US and Europe.
Smardon, R.C. (1982) An Organizational Analysis of Federal Agency Visual Resource Management Systems. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Environmental Planning Program at the College of Environmental Design, University of California, Berkeley, 330 p. Available from International Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
Smardon, R.C. (1986) Historical Evolution of Visual Resource Management within Three Federal Agencies. Journal of Environmental Management, 22, 301-317.
42 USC s. 4321 et seq. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
Elsner, G.H. and Smardon, R.C. (Tech. Coord.) (1979) Proceedings of Our National Landscape: A Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of the Visual Resource, Incline Village, Nevada, 23-25 April 1979, USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rpt. PSW-35, Berkeley CA, Pacific SW For. & Range Exp. Stn, 752 p. http://www.esf.edu/via http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/27530
Bacon, W. (1979) The Visual Management System of the Forest Service, USDA. In: Elsner, G. and Smardon, R., (Tech. Coord.), Our National Landscape, 660. http://www.esf.edu/via http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/27530
Ross Jr., R.W. (1979) The Bureau of Land Management and Visual Resource Management—An Overview. In: Elsner, G. and Smardon, R., (Tech. Coord.), Our National Landscape, 666-671. http://www.esf.edu/via http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/27530
Schauman, S. and Adams, C. (1979) Soil Conservation Service Landscape Management. In: Elsner, G. and Smardon, R., (Tech. Coord.), Our National Landscape, 671-675. http://www.esf.edu/via http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/27530
USDA, Forest Service (1973) National Forest Service Mgmt. Vol. 1, USDA Handbook 434, US Gov Print Off, Wash DC.
USDA, Forest Service (1974) National Forest Landscape Mgmt. Vol. 2, Chap. 1. USDA Handbook 462, US Gov Print Off, Wash DC.
Litton Jr., R.B. (1973) Landscape Control Points; a Procedure for Predicting and Monitoring Visual Impact. USDA, For. Serv. Res. Paper PSW-91, Berkeley, CA Pac. SW For. & Range Exp. Stn.
USDA, Forest Service (1976) Forest Service Manual Sections 2360.01-2363.37 and 2350, US Gov Print Off, Wash DC.
USDA, Forest Service (1995) Landscape Aesthetics; a Handbook for Scenery Management. Agricultural Handbook No. 701. US Gov Print Off, Wash DC. http://www.esf.edu/via http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fsm9_005639.pdf
USDI, BLM (1980) BLM Manual Sections 6300, 6310 and 6320, Visual Resource Mgmt. USDI, Bureau of Land Management, Wash DC. http://www.esf.edu/via
Smardon, R.C., Feimer, N.R., Craik, K.H. and Sheppard, S.R.J. (1983) Assessing the Reliability, Validity and Generalizability of Observer Based Visual Impact Assessment Methods for the Western US. In: Rose, R.D. and Chestnut, L.G., Eds., Managing Air Quality and Scenic Resources at National Parks and Wilderness Areas, Westview Press, Boulder, 84-102.
Feimer, N.R., Craik, K.H., Smardon, R.C. and Sheppard, S.R.J. (1979) Appraising the Validity of Visual Impact Assessment Methods. Proceedings of Our National Landscape, Incline Village, 23-25 April 1979, 286-295. http://www.esf.edu/via http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/27530
Feimer, N.R., Smardon, R.C. and Craik, K.H. (1981) Evaluating the Effectiveness of Observer Based Visual Resource and Impact Assessment Methods. Landscape Research, 6, 112-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426398108705963
Miller, P.A. (1984) A Comparative Study of the BLM Scenic Quality Rating Procedure and Landscape Preference Dimensions. Landscape Journal, 3, 123-135.
Palmer, J.F. and Hoffman, R.E. (2001) Rating Reliability and Representation Validity in Scenic Landscape Assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 149-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00133-5
USDA Soil Conservation Service (1978) Procedures to Establish Priorities in Landscape Architecture. USDA SCS Technical Release No. 65, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
Blair, G.E., Isaacson, L. and Jones, G.R. (1979) A Comprehensive Approach to Visual Resource Management for Highway Agencies. In: Elsner, G. and Smardon, R., Eds., Proceedings of Our National Landscape, Incline Village, 23-25 April 1979, 660. http://www.esf.edu/via http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/27530
Jones G., Sorey, D. and Scott, C. (2012) Visual Resource Assessment for Regional Landscapes: A Modern Response to NEPA. 37th Annual NAEP Conference on Science, Politics and Policy: Environmental Nexus, National Association of Environmental Professionals, Portland Oregon, 21-24 May 2012, 641-656.
USDOT and FHWA (1988) Visual Impact Assessment for Highway Projects. Publication No. FHWA-HI-88-054, USDOT, Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC. http://contextsensitivesolutions.org/content/reading/visual-impact-2/
Palmer, J.F., Churchward, C., Nassauer, J.I. and Swanwick, C.A. (2012) An Evaluation of the Visual Impact Assessment Process as Used by State Departments of Transportation in the USA. 37th Annual NAEP Conference on Science, Politics and Policy: Environmental Nexus, National Association of Environmental Professionals, Portland Oregon, 21-24 May 2012, 735-750.
Noe, F.P. and Hammitt, W.E. (1988) Visual Preferences of Travelers along the Blue Ridge Parkway. Scientific Monograph Series Number 18, USDI, National Park Service Monograph Series No. 18, USDI, National Park Service, Washington DC.
US EPA (1979) Protecting Visibility: An EPA Report to Congress. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Noise and Radiation, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, EPA-450/5-79-008.
Molenar, J.V., Paterson, R.W. and Goodstein, M.D. (2102) Seeking Clarity: Scenic, Economic and Legal Views on Visibility. 37th Annual NAEP Conference on Science, Politics and Policy: Environmental Nexus, National Association of Environmental Professionals, Portland Oregon, 21-24 May 2012, 767-817.
Henderson, J.E., Smardon, R.C. and Palmer, J.F. (1988) US Army Corps of Engineers Visual Resources Assessment Procedure. Transportation Research Record, 67-71.
Smardon, R.C., Palmer, J.F., Knopf, J., Grinde, K., Henderson, J.E. and Peyman-Dave, L.D. (1988) Visual Resource Assessment Procedure for US Army Corps of Engineers, Instruction Report EL-88-1, USACOE Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. http://www.esf.edu/via
Smardon, R.C., Palmer, J.F. and Felleman, J.F. (1986) Foundations for Visual Project Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York. http://www.esf.edu/via
Bishop, I.D. and Lange, E. (Eds.) (2005) Visualization in Landscape and Environmental Planning. Taylor and Francis, London.
Lange, E. and Bishop, I. (Eds.) (2001) Our Visual Landscape; Analysis, Modeling, Visualization and Protection. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00121-9
Zube, E.H., Sell, J.L. and Taylor, L.G. (1982) Landscape Perception: Research, Application and Theory. Landscape and Urban Planning, 9, 1-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0
Landscape Institute/Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (LI/IEMA) (2002) Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment. SPON Press, London.
Williams, W. and Whitcomb, R. (2007) Cape Wind: Money, Celebrity, Class Politics and the Battle for Our Energy Future. Public Affairs Book, New York.
DTI (2005) Guidance on the Assessment of the Impact of Offshore Wind Farms: Seascape and Visual Impact. Report of the Department of Trade and Industry Publication 806666 UK. http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/what%20we%20do/uk%20energy%20supply/energy%20mix/ renewable%20%energy/policy/offshore/rag/complete/file22852.pdf
Hill, M., Briggs, J., Minto, P., Bagnall, D., Foley, K. and Williams, A. (2001) Guide to Best Practice in Seascape Assessment, Countryside Commission of Wales. Brady Simpson Marsh and University College Dublin. http://www.marine.ie/NR/rdonlyres/683C8CDo-3367-47048542D3091607C9C2/0/interreg5_1.pdf
Honor-McLennon and Envision (2006) Visual Representation of Wind farms: Good Practice Guidance. Report for the Scottish National Heritage, the South Scottish Forum and the Scottish Society for Direction and Planning. http://www.snh.gov.uk/docs/A305436.pdf
Bishop, I.D. (2002) Determination of Thresholds of Visual Impact: The Case of Wind Turbines. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29, 707-718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b12854
Bishop, I.D. and Miller, D.R. (2007) Visual Assessment of Offshore Wind Turbines: The Influence of Distance, Contrast, Movement and Social Variables. Renewable Energy, 32, 814-831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.03.009
Palmer, J.F. (2012) Maine’s Experience Evaluating When Scenic Impacts from Wind Energy Development Are Reasonably Adverse. 37th Annual NAEP Conference on Science, Politics and Policy: Environmental Nexus, National Association of Environmental Professionals, Portland Oregon, 21-24 May 2012, 602-620
Rooney, S., Dascomb, P., Korjeff, S. and Smardon, R. (2012) Technical Bulletin 12-001, Visual Impact Assessment Methodology for Offshore Wind Energy Conversion Facilities. Cape Cod Commission, Barnstable. http://www.esf.edu/via
Sullivan, R.G., Kirchler, L.B., Cothren, J. and Winters, S.L. (2012) Preliminary Assessment of Offshore Wind Turbine Visibility and Visual Impact Threshold Distances. 37th Annual NAEP Conference on Science, Politics and Policy: Environmental Nexus, National Association of Environmental Professionals, Portland Oregon, 21-24 May 2012, 943-969.
Sullivan, R.G., Cothren, J., Williamson, M., Smith, P., McCarthy, J. and Kirchler, L.B. (2102) Visual Impact Risk Assessment and Mitigation Mapping System for Utility-Scale Wind Energy Facilities. 37th Annual NAEP Conference on Science, Politics and Policy: Environmental Nexus, National Association of Environmental Professionals, Portland Oregon, 21-24 May 2012, 667-692.
Sullivan, R.G., Kirchler, L.B., Lahti, T., Roche, S., Beckman, K., Cantwell, B. and Richmond, P. (2012) Wind Turbine Visibility and Visual Impact Distances in Western Landscapes. 37th Annual NAEP Conference on Science, Politics and Policy: Environmental Nexus, National Association of Environmental Professionals, Portland Oregon, 21-24 May 2012, 897-942.
Ribe, R. (2012) How Do People’s Demographic Attributes and Environmental Attitudes Relate to Their Perception of Scenic Beauty? The Case of Forests in the Pacific Northwest. 37th Annual NAEP Conference on Science, Politics and Policy: Environmental Nexus, National Association of Environmental Professionals, Portland Oregon, 21-24 May 2012, 971-1025.
Roth, M. (2012) Visual Landscape Quality Assessment in Landscape Planning in Germany: A Validation Approach. 37th Annual NAEP Conference on Science, Politics and Policy: Environmental Nexus, National Association of Environmental Professionals, Portland Oregon, 21-24 May 2012, 632-640.
Schwarzler, K. and Cramer, G. (2012) The Art and Science of Camouflage for Visual Mitigation in the Landscape. 37th Annual NAEP Conference on Science, Politics and Policy: Environmental Nexus, National Association of Environmental Professionals, Portland Oregon, 21-24 May 2012, 693-715.
USDA Forest Service (Undated) Briefing Paper, Scenery Management System-Appendix J. US Forest Service, Washington DC.
Spencer, J., Mosier, J. and Laughlin, N. (2008) SMS Appendix J Project Level Scenery Analysis Template. US Forest Service.
Sheppard, S.R.J. (2012) Visualizing Climate Change: A Guide to Visual Communication of Climate Change and Developing Local Solutions. Rutledge Press, London.
Smardon, R.C. and Karp, J. (1992) The Legal Landscape, Guidelines for Regulating Aesthetic and Environmental Quality. Van Nostrand Rhinehold, New York. http://www.esf.edu/via
Sullivan, R.G. and Meyer, M. (2014) Guide to Evaluating Visual Impact Assessments for Renewable Energy Projects. Natural Resource Report NPS/ARD/NRR-2014/836 US National Park Service and Argonne National Laboratory.
USDI Bureau of Land Management (2013) Best Management Practices for Reducing Visual Impacts of Renewable Energy Facilities on BLM-Administered Lands. USDI BLM, Wyoming Office, Cheyenne.