Odour Impact Assessment by Means of Dispersion Modeling, Dynamic Olfactometry and Mobile Electronic Nose around Agadir Fishing Port in Morocco
- 1 AQUAMAR Laboratory, Photocatalysis and Environment Team, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Ibn Zohr University, Agadir, Morocco
- 2 AQUAMAR Laboratory, Photocatalysis and Environment Team, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Ibn Zohr University, Agadir, Morocco
Abstract
Odorous emissions emitted from various sources including industrial and commercial activities have particular concerns about human health. These malodors emissions are an environmental concern that affects health status and social life of the neighbors. That requires the local authority to set up a management strategy to control this nuisance. The evaluation of odour emissions from fishing port is complex because these emissions depend on several factors such as multiple sources of odor emissions, meteorological conditions, topography and others. That imposes the use of complementary approaches to monitor odours. In this paper, the case of Agadir fishing port is studied, which is adjacent to the tourist area and residential neighborhoods and which hosts a number of points that can generate odors. To assess this odour impact, three methods are used such as dynamic olfactometry, dispersion modeling and mobile electronic nose (e-nose). The use of these three methods in a complementary manner to assess odour impacts around a fishing port allowed both the quantification of the emissions using dynamic olfactometry and the evaluation of their impact on the study area with model dispersion. The results enabled also to identify the most affected areas of the city by odor emissions and to recognize the meteorological parameters maximizing odor impact. The other goal of this work is to compare the results of the odour dispersion modeling and e-nose measurements for one year in terms of frequency of overtaking the set alert thresholds over the same period. Comparison highlights the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches. Modeling can be used predicatively but it does not take into account fugitive emissions reliably in the absence of data on these emissions, modeling based on the hourly average misjudges the odor peaks, while e-nose made it possible to obtain validated data and provides accurate, affordable and real-time odour measurement capability tacking in to account the role of human perception without being able to characterize the extent of the odor nuisance caused by each source. We conclude that these three valuation methods provide complementary information about odor nuisance and reasonable estimates of odors.
- Gallego, E., Soriano, C., Roca, F.X., Perales, J.F., Alarcon, M. and Guardino, X. (2008) Identification of the Origin of Odour Episodes through Social Participation, Chemical Control and Numerical Modeling. Atmospheric Environment, 42, 8150-8160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.004
- Capelli, L., Sironi, S., Del Rossoa, R., Céntola, P., Rossi, A. and Austeri, C. (2011) Odour Impact Assessment in Urban Areas: Case Study of the City of Terni. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 4, 151-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.03.018
- Nicell, J.A. (2009) Assessment and Regulation of Odour Impacts. Atmospheric Environment, 43, 196-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.033
- Freeman, T. and Cudmore, R. (2002) Review of Odour Management in New Zealand. Air Quality Technical Report No. 24, New Zealand Ministry of Environment, Wellington.
- Schauberger, G. and Piringer, M. (2012) Assessment of Separation Distances to Avoid Odour Annoyance: Interaction between Odour Impact Criteria and Peak-to-Mean Factors. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 30, 13-18
- Ranzato, L., Barausse, A., Mantovani, A., Pittarello, A., Benzo, M. and Palmeri, L. (2012) A Comparison of Methods for the Assessment of Odor Impacts on Air Quality: Field Inspection (VDI3940) and the Air Dispersion Model CALPUFF. Atmospheric Environment, 61, 570-579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.009
- Seo, S.-G., Ma, Z.-K., Jeon, J.-M., Jung, S.-C. and Lee, W.-B. (2011) Measurements of Key Offensive Odorants in a fishery Industrial Complex in Korea. Atmospheric Environment, 45, 2929-2936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.032
- Capelli, L., Sironi, S. and Del Rosso, R. (2014) Electronic Noses for Environmental Monitoring Applications, Sensors, 14, 19979-20007. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s141119979
- Romain, A.C. and Nicolas, J. (2010) Long Term Stability of Metal Oxide-Based Gas Sensors for E-Nose Environmental Applications: An Overview. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 146, 502-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2009.12.027
- Kermani, B.G., Schiffman, S.S. and Nagle, H.T. (2005) Performance of the Levenberg-Marquardt Neural Network Training Method in Electronic Nose Applications. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 110, 13-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2005.01.008
- Chirmata, A., Ichou, I.A. and Page, T. (2015) A Continuous Electronic Nose Odor Monitoring System in the City of Agadir Morocco. Journal of Environmental Protection, 6, 54-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jep.2015.61007