Spatial Distribution of Fuel Models Based on the Conditional-Fuel-Loading Concept
- 1 Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Guadalajara, México
Abstract
Fuel model mapping has followed in general two trends: 1) indirect inferences, where some factors, presumably associated with fuel production, are related to a given fuel model; and 2) experts consulting, which has been used to classify and to validate other people classifications. However, reliance on expert judgment implies a subjective approach. Thus, I propone the integration of geostatistic techniques and the Conditional-Fuels-Loading concept (CFL) to define a more objective perspective in the fuel-model mapping. The information used in this study was collected in a forest of Chihuahua, Mexico, where fuels were inventoried in 554 (1000 m 2 ) sample plots. These sample plots were classified using the CFL; and ordinary kriging (Gaussian, spherical and exponential) was used to interpolate the fuel-model values. Using the Akaike’s Information Criterion the spherical model performed best. The methodology allowed a finer definition of spatial distribution of fuel models. Some advantages of the CFL are: 1) it is based on actual fuel loads, and not only on vegetation structure and composition; 2) it is objective and avoids the bias of different classifiers (experts); and 3) it avoids the need of the advice of experts.
- Stephens, S.L. and Ruth, L.W. (2005) Federal Forest-Fire Policy in the United States. Ecological Applications, 15, 532-542. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0545
- Hann, W.J. and Bunnell, D.L. (2001) Fire and Land Management Planning and Implementation across Multiple Scales. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 10, 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF01037
- Finney, M.A. (2004) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-Model Development and Evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Research Paper RMRS-RP-4, 47 p.
- Keane, R.E., Burgan, R. and van Wagtendok, J. (2001) Mapping Wildland Fuels for Fire Management across Multiple Scales: Integ Rating Remote Sensing, GIS, and Biophysical Modeling. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 10, 301-319. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF01028
- Keane, R.E., Mincemoyer, S.A., Schmidt, K.M., Long, D.G. and Garner, J.L. (1999) Mapping Vegetation and Fuels for Fire Management on the Gila National Forest Complex, New Mexico. USDA Forest Service. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-46-CD, 126 p.
- Chuvieco, E. and Salas, J. (1996) Mapping the Spatial Distribution of Forest Fire Danger Using GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 10, 333-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02693799608902082
- Valdez, L.J.R. (2001) Optimal Spatial Location of Forest Fuel Management Activities. Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 124 p.
- Arroyo, L.A., Pascual, C. and Manzanera, J.A. (2008) Fire Models and Methods to Map Fuel Types: The Role of Remote Sensing. Forest Ecology and Management, 256, 1239-1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.048
- Reich, R.M., Lundquist, J.E. and Bravo, V.A. (2004) Spatial Models for Estimating Fuel Loads in the Black Hills, South Dakota, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 13, 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF02049
- Flore, G.J.G. (2001) Modeling the Spatial Variability of Forest Fuel Arrays. Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado State University, For Collins, 184 p.
- Flores, G. (Unpublished) The Conditional-Fuels-Loading Concept as an Alternative to Evaluate the Accuracy of Fuel-Model Classifications.
- Sikkink, P.G. and Keane, R.E. (2008) A Comparison of Five Sampling Techniques to Estimate Surface Fuel Loading in Montane Forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 17, 363-379. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07003
- Kennard, D.K. and Outcalt, K. (2006) Modeling Spatial Patterns of Fuels and Fire Behavior in a Longleaf Pine Forest in the Southeastern USA. Fire Ecology, 2, 31-52. https://doi.org/10.4996/fireecology.0201031