Sub-Saharan African countries depend 80% on the biomass-wood to meet their daily needs in terms of cooking foods. Traditional cookstoves are much more used to this effect. Many change programmes for replacing cookstove model have been planned. Yet many of these programmes have not been preceded by environmental impact studies. This work offers high-performance cookstove models and determines their impact on the reduction of CO 2 emissions, a very harmful greenhouse gas causing the planet warming and climate change. Replacing the traditional cookstove by an improved stove may lead to an economy in terms of fuel ranging from 33.2% to 75.4% according to the model of cookstoves. Yet the Gasifier using pellets as fuel remains the most beneficial stove in terms of fuel saving (75.4%) and in terms of ER CO 2 , i.e. 2748 t CO 2 /Year. An improved gasifier cookstove is multi-fuel. He can use charcoal, pellets and wood. This is an indispensable cooking tool with alternative fuels. In this work, the ER CO 2 was evaluated using two methods. The KPT, which is a field method and the CCT which is a laboratory method. By the KPT method a gasifier ICS/GAS/P records up to an ERCO 2 of 2748 t CO 2 /Year, while with the same gasifier, an ERCO 2 of 2619 t CO 2 /year is found by the CCT method. The comparison between the two methods shows the same trend but with very high values of ERCO 2 for the KPT method results. The variation between the two methods ranges between 1% approximately to 6.9 percent.
Rehfuess, E., Mehta, S. and Prüss-üstün, A. (2006) Assessing Household Solid Fuel Use: Multiple Implications for the Millennium Development Goals. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114, 373-387. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8603
Tigabu, A. (2017) Factors Associated with Sustained Use of Improved Solid Fuel Cookstoves: A Case Study from Kenya. Energy for Sustainable Development, 41, 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.08.008
Ramanathan, V. and Carmichael, G. (2008) Global and Regional Climate Changes due to Black Carbon. Nature Geoscience, 1, 221-227. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo156
Ramanathan, V. (2007) Role of Black Carbon in Global and Regional Climate Changes. http://www-ramanathan.ucsd.edu/files/bc-testimony.pdf
Thacker, K.S., Barger, K.M. and Mattson, C.A. (2017) Balancing Technical and User Objectives in the Redesign of a Peruvian Cookstove. Development Engineering, 2, 12-19.
Adria, O. and Bethge, J. (2013) What Users Can Save with Energy-Efficient Cooking Stoves and Ovens. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy. http://www.bigee.net/media/filer_public/2014/03/17/appliance__residential_ cookingstoves__user_savings__20140220__8.pdf
OECD/IEA (2006) Energy for Cooking in Developing Countries. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/cooking.pdf
Bryden, M., Still, D., Scott, P., Hoffa, G., Ogle, D., Bailis, R. and Goyer, K. Design Principles for Wood Burning Cook Stoves. http://www.bioenergylists.org/stovesdoc/Pcia/Design%20Principles%20for%20Woo d%20Burning%20Cookstoves.pdf
Manoa, D.O., Oloo, T. and Kasaine, S. (2017) The Efficiency of the Energy Saving Stoves in Amboseli Ecosystem-Analysis of Time, Energy and Carbon Emissions Savings. Open Journal of Energy Efficiency, 6, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojee.2017.63007
Sawauchi, D., Kunii, D. and Yamamoto, Y. (2015) Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Energy Self-Sufficiency of Woody Biomass Utilization for Residential Heating: A Case Study of Nishiwaga, Japan. Journal of Environmental Protection, 6, 321-327. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2015.64032
Halder, P. (2014) Forest Biomass for Energy Production: Perceptions of State Forestry Professionals from China and India. Challenges, 5, 338-350. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe5020338
Mac Cormic, K. and Kautto, N. (2013) The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview. Sustainability, 5, 2589-2608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062589
Cherubini, F., Bird, N.D., Cowie, A., Jungmeier, G., Schlamadinger, B. and Gallasch, S.W. (2009) Energy- and Greenhouse Gas-Based LCA of Biofuel and Bioenergy Systems: Key Issues, Ranges and Recommendations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53, 434-447.
Cherubini, F. and Stromman, A.H. (2011) Life Cycle Assessment of Bioenergy Systems: State of the Art and Future Challenges. Bioresource Technology, 102, 437-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.010
Havlík, P., Schneider, U.A., Schmid, E., Böttcher, H., Fritz, S., Skalsky, R., Aoki, K., Cara, S.D., Kindermann, G., Kraxner, F., Leduc, S., McCallum, I., Mosnier, A., Sauer, T. and Obersteiner, M. (2011) Global Land-Use Implications of First and Second Generation Biofuel Targets. Energy Policy, 39, 5690-5702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.030
Dresen, E., DeVries, B., Herold, M., Verchot, L. and Muller, R. (2014) Fuelwood Savings and Carbon Emission Reductions by the Use of Improved Cooking Stoves in an Afromontane Forest, Ethiopia. Land, 3, 1137-1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/land3031137
Hosonuma, N., Herold, M., de Sy, V., de Fries, R.S., Brockhaus, M., Verchot, L., Angelsen, A. and Romijn, E. (2012) An Assessment of Deforestation and Forest Degradation Drivers in Developing Countries. Environmental Research Letters, 7, Article ID: 4009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044009
Pérez, E.J.H., Ilunga, O.M. and María Cristina Moros Gómez et Carlos Vargas Salgado (2017) Analyse des impacts économico-environnementaux du changement d’usage d’un foyer de cuisson traditionnel par un foyer de cuisson amélioré optimisé à charbon de bois dans les ménages de la ville de Kinshasa. http://lodel.irevues.inist.fr/dechets-sciences-techniques/index.php?id=3714
Egeru, A.S. (2014) Rural Households’ Fuelwood Demand Determinants in Dryland Areas of Eastern Uganda. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9, 39-45.
Lewis, J.J. and Pattanayak, S.K. (2012) Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120, 637-645. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104194
Jetter, J., Zhao, Y., Smith, K.R., Khan, B., Yelverton, T., Decarlo, P. and Hays, M.D. (2012) Pollutant Emissions and Energy Efficiency under Controlled Conditions for Household Biomass Cookstoves and Implications for Metrics Useful in Setting International Test Standards. Environmental Science & Technology, 46, 10827-10834. https://doi.org/10.1021/es301693f
Johnson, M., Pilco, V., Torres, R., Joshi, S., Shrestha, R.M., Yagnaraman, M., Lam, N.L., Doroski, B., Mitchell, J., Canuz, E., et al. (2013) Impacts on Household Fuel Consumption from Biomassstove Programs in India, Nepal, and Peru. Energy for Sustainable Development, 17, 403-411.
Clark, M.L., Reynolds, S.J., Burch, J.B., Conway, S., Bachand, A.M. and Peel, J.L. (2010) Indoor Air Pollution, Cookstove Quality, and Housing Characteristics in Two Honduran Communities. Environmental Research, 110, 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2009.10.008
Candela, S., Julio, L., Javier, M., Adolfo, N., Luz, F. and Rafael, B. (2014) Effectiveness of Improved Cookstoves to Reduce Indoor Air Pollution in Developing Countries. The Case of the Cassamance Natural Subregion, Western Africa. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 2, 1-5.
Dutta, K., Shields, N.K., Edwards, R. and Smith, K.R. (2007) Impact of Improved Biomass Cookstoves on Indoor Air Quality near Pune, India. Energy for Sustainable Development, 11, 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60397-X
Edwards, R., Hubbard, A., Khalakdina, A., Pennise, D. and Smith, K.R. (2007) Design Considerations for Field Studies of Changes in Indoor Air Pollution due to Improved Stoves. Energy for Sustainable Development, 11, 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60401-9
Smith, K.R., Dutta, K., Chengappa, C., Gusain, P.P.S., Masera, O., Berrueta, V., et al. (2007) Monitoring and Evaluation of Improved Biomass Cookstove Programs for Indoor Air Quality and Stove Performance: Conclusions from the Household Energy and Health Project. Energy for Sustainable Development, 11, 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60396-8
Wang, Y., Sohn, M.D., Gadgil, A.J., Wang, Y., Lask, K.M. and Kirchstetter, T.W. (2013) How Many Replicate Tests Do I Need Variability of Cookstove Performance and Emissions Has Implications for Obtaining Useful Results. https://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/1172123
The Controlled Cooking Test (CCT) Version 2.0. (2004). https://cleancookstoves.org/binary-data/DOCUMENT/file/000/000/80-1.pdf
Bailis, R., Kirk, R. Smith, K.R. and Edwards, R. (2007) Kitchen Performance Test (KPT) Versión 3.0, 2007. https://cleancookstoves.org/binary-data/DOCUMENT/file/000/000/83-1.pdf
UNFCC (2016) AMS-II.G. Small-Scale Methodology: Energy Efficiency Measures in Thermal Applications of Non-Renewable Biomass Version 08.0 Sectoral Scope(s): 03. https://cdm.unfccc.int/filestorage/S/0/5/S05JFDNZBV9YMCQT2UE6XWO174PL3 A/EB90_repan13_AMS-II.G_%28v08.0%29.pdf?t=YTZ8cDhndjRsfDD3bWwvx3pL 3IruY8Uqr_Ga
UNFCC (2015) AMS-II.G. Small-Scale Methodology: Energy Efficiency Measures in Thermal Applications of Non-Renewable Biomass Version 07.0 Sectoral Scope(s): 03. https://cdm.unfccc.int/filestorage/X/J/5/XJ5UFAGWDEM7L30CSYPO6B842N19Q V/EB85_repan14_AMS-II.G_%28v07.0%29.pdf?t=MmV8cDhndmRtfDCwC-SzoKi y-aVKktffMeQx
UNFCC (2014) AMS-II.G. Small-Scale Methodology: Energy Efficiency Measures in Thermal Applications of Non-Renewable Biomass Version 06.0 Sectoral Scope(s): 03. https://cdm.unfccc.int/filestorage/E/I/W/EIWYRJZHSD6KXUL8G9C5NB03V1TO2 M/EB77_repan11_AMS-II.G_ver%2006.0.pdf?t=azV8cDhndm1lfDB06xx0AZsH Di-y5vNyqOh
UNFCC (2012) AMS-II.G. Small-Scale Methodology: Energy Efficiency Measures in Thermal Applications of Non-Renewable Biomass Version 06.0 Sectoral Scope(s): 03. https://cdm.unfccc.int/filestorage/7/m/24G3EKN6PT0QJ1BHRICMYDX97OW8 UF.pdf/EB70_repan30_AMS-II.G_ver05.0.pdf?t=Y0J8cDhndnJ4fDA1hxTPIeILYsB3tw ggG60c
Medina, P., Berrueta, V., Martínez, M., Ruiz, V., Ruiz-Mercado, I. and Masera, O.R. (2017) Closing the Gap between Lab and Field Cookstove Tests: Benefits of Multi-Pot and Sequencing Cooking Tasks through Controlled Burning Cycles. Energy for Sustainable Development, 41, 106-111.
Yves, S., Paul, B., Stéphane,V. and José, C. (1997) Une évaluation de la technique de la carbonisation en meule. Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement, 1, 113-124. http://popups.ulg.ac.be/1780-4507/index.php?id=16126
Kabore, I. (2011) Méthodologies de projections de population. Ouagadougou. http://slideplayer.fr/slide/486065/