Unlocking Causal Relationships in Commercial Banking Risk Management: An Examination of Explainable AI Integration with Multi-Factor Risk Models
- 1 Financial Intelligence Program, International Technological University, San Jose, USA
- 2 UC Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
Abstract
The 21st century has ushered in transformative digital technologies, notably Artificial Intelligence (AI), which has the potential to redefine commercial banking risk management, especially in the current complicated geopolitical context. This paper examines the integration of Explainable AI into tradition al multi-factor models used in commercial banking. Traditional models, while foundational, often struggle to decipher intricate causal relationships between various risk factors, especially with limited data. With the advent of AI, especially machine learning techniques like Bayesian networks and random forests, there is an opportunity to enhance these models by capturing intricate risk interdependencies and predicting future risks more precisely. We delve deep into the nuances of XAI, emphasizing its potential in making AI’s decision-making transparent and interpretable, addressing the “black box” challenge. Furthermore, we explore the application of Explainable AI in detecting causal relationships within restricted datasets, underscoring the importance of techniques like cross-validation, regularization, and bootstrapping. The paper concludes by highlighting the need for a synergistic approach, combining Explainable AI’s capabilities with the robustness of traditional models, setting the stage for future research in this promising nexus of technology and finance.
- Bargagli Stoffi, F. J., Cevolani, G., & Gnecco, G. (2022). Simple Models in Complex Worlds: Occam’s Razor and Statistical Learning Theory. Minds & Machines, 32, 13-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-022-09592-z
- Boukherouaa, E. B., AlAjmi, K., Deodoro, J., Farias, A., & Ravikumar, R. (2021). Powering the Digital Economy: Opportunities and Risks of Artificial Intelligence in Finance (Vol. 2021). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781589063952.087
- Bussmann, N., Giudici, P., Marinelli, D., & Papenbrock, J. (2021). Explainable Machine Learning in Credit Risk Management. Computational Economics, 57, 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-020-10042-0
- Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly Detection: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41, Article No. 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541880.1541882
- European Central Bank (ECB) (2017). Occasional Paper Series. Macroprudential Stress Test of the Euro Area Banking System. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op226~5e126a8e37.en.pdf
- Faggella, D. (2020). AI Transparency in Finance—Understanding the Black Box. https://emerj.com/partner-content/ai-transparency-in-finance/
- Hu, B., & Wu, Y. (2023). AI-Based Compliance Automation in Commercial Bank: How the Silicon Valley Bank Provided a Cautionary Tale for Future Integration. International Research in Economics and Finance, 7, 13-15. https://doi.org/10.20849/iref.v7i1.1356
- Jobst, A., & Gray, D. F. (2013). Systemic Contingent Claims Analysis: Estimating Market-Implied Systemic Risk (Vol. 2013). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475572780.001
- Jobst, A., Ong, L. L., & Schmieder, C. (2013) A Framework for Macroprudential Bank Solvency Stress Testing: Application to S-25 and Other G-20 Country FSAPs. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781616355074.001
- OECD (2021). Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Big Data in Finance: Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications for Policy Makers. https://www.oecd.org/finance/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-big-data-in-finance.htm
- Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111-163. https://doi.org/10.2307/271063
- Sarker, I. H. (2021). Machine Learning: Algorithms, Real-World Applications and Research Directions. SN Computer Science, 2, Article No. 160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x