Determinants of IPOs Initial Return: Extreme Analysis of Indian Market
- 1 Institute of Technology, Roorkee Uttrakhand, India
- 2 Institute of Technology, Roorkee Uttrakhand, India
Abstract
This paper attempts to design and test empirical models, which integrate theoretical, institutional, and other factors, which interact to explain ownership structure. Ex-ante information at the level of under-pricing succeeds the Indian stock market crunch. The study is based on IPO that listed at Bombay stock exchange given that April 2000 to December 2011. Multiple linear regressions are used to distinguish the relationship between various independent variables with the dependent variable, i.e. level of underpricing. The outcomes of multiple regressions reveal that, firm’s age, IPO years, book building pricing mechanism, ownership structure, issue size, & market capitalization explained 44% of the variation in issuer under-pricing, Durbin Watson’s value subsisted 1.58, which indicates that, there is a positive sequential rela-tionship between variables. Number of share offered, issue size, market capitalization, subscription offer timing, book building mechanism and IPO years 2006, 2009 & 2011 are constructed to have important effect on the level of underpricing after the Indian market crisis. Nevertheless, firm’s age, IPOs year 2008, private issuing firms, non institutional promoters, Indian promoters and non institutional non promoters contain no significant difference in the level of underpricing after-market crisis.
- Allen, F., & Faulhaber, G. (1989). Signaling by under pricing in the IPO market. Journal of Financial Economics, 23, 303-323. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(89)90060-3
- Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2007). Investor sentiment in the stock mar ket. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 129-151. doi:10.1257/jep.21.2.129
- Baron, D. P. (1982). A model of the demand for investment banking advising and distribution services for new issues. The Journal of Finance, 37, 955-976. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1982.tb03591.x
- Barry, C. B., & Brown, S. (1985). Differential information and security market equilibrium. Journal of Financial Quantitative Analysis, 20, 407-422. doi:10.2307/2330758
- Bansal, R., & Khanna, A. (2012). Pricing mechanism and explaining underpricing of IPOs, evidence from Bombay stock exchange India. International Journal of Research in Finance and Marketing, 2, 205 216.
- Bansal R., & Khanna, R. (2012). Post Indian stock market’s crisis and its impact on IPOs underpricing: Evidence from 2008-2011. Asian Journal of Management Research, 3, 1-11.
- Bansal R., & Khanna, R. (2012). IPOs underpricing and money “left on the table” in Indian market. International Journal of Research in Management, Economics and Commerce, 2, 106-120.
- Bansal R., & Khanna, R. (2012). Share holding’s pattern and its impact on IPO Underpricing: After Indian stock market crisis in 2008. Asian Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, 2, 159-174.
- Bansal R., & Khanna, R. (2012). Does ownership structure affecting IPO underpricing: A case of Indian stock market. International Journal of Business Economics and Management Research, 3, 39-51.
- Bansal R., & Khanna, R. (2012). IPO underpricing cloud or rain: Event commencing from Bombay stock exchange. International Journal of Management and Behavioural Science, 1, 154-179.
- Bansal R., & Khanna, R. (2012). Analysis of IPO underpricing: Evi dence from Bombay stock Exchange. International Journal of Re search in Commerce, It & Management, 2, 1-6.
- Benveniste, L. M., & Spindt, P. A. (1989). How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues. Journal of Financial Economics, 24, 343-361. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(89)90051-2
- Dolvin, S. D., & Jordan, B. D. (2008). Underpricing, overhang, and the cost of going public to pre-exiting shareholders. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 35, 434-458. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.2008.02087.x