Classification of Risk Perceptions of Trading Firms
- 1 Department of Agriculture Economics, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey
- 2 Department of Agriculture Economics, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
- 3 Department of Business Administration, Antalya International University, Antalya, Turkey
Abstract
Risks faced by the trading firms cannot be eliminated completely due to the reasons arising from the structure of international trade. Therefore, minimizing risk and managing it well lay down the foundation of modern risk approach. The most important element of risk management is to define and categorize the risk. This study aims at perceptual description of risk within the scope of the firms exporting agricultural products in Turkey. The main purpose is to classify the risks faced by these firms. The study uses factor analysis to determine the behavioral and perceptional dimensions of the firms; and also uses multidimensional scaling in positioning the firms’ risk perceptions. The findings show that seven dimensions namely political, economic, trade, financial, food safety and goods delivery formulate risk perception of the firms. Multi-dimensional scaling technique maps the perception under two dimensions. The results of the research can be helpful for the managers of agri-products export firms in designing risk management strategies.
- Beneito, P., Coscollá-Girona, P., Rochina-Barrachina, M.E., & Sanchis, A. (2015). Competitive Pressure and Innovation at the Firm Level. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 63, 422-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joie.12079
- Cucchiella, F., & Gastaldi, M. (2006). Risk Management in Supply Chain: A Real Option Approach. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17, 700-720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410380610678756
- Hunter, L. M., Kasouf, C. J., Celuch, K. G., & Curry, K. A. (2004). A Classification of Business-to-Business Buying Decisions: Risk Importance and Probability as a Framework for E-Business Benefits. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 145-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(03)00058-0
- Jiang, B., Baker, R., & Frazier, G. (2008). An Analysis of Job Dissatisfaction and Turnover to Reduce Global Supply Chain Risk: Evidence from China. Journal of Operations Management, 27, 169-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.09.002
- Jüttner, U. (2005). Supply Chain Risk Management: Understanding the Business Requirements from a Practitioner Perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16, 120-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09574090510617385
- Jüttner, U., Peck, H., & Christopher, M. (2003). Supply Chain Risk Management: Outlining an Agenda for Future Research. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 6, 197-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13675560310001627016
- Kern, D., Moser, R., Hartmann, E., & Moder, M. (2012). Supply Risk Management: Model Development and Empirical Analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42, 60-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09600031211202472
- Kersten, W., Hohrath, P., & Böger, M. (2007). An Empirical Approach to Supply Chain Risk Management: Development of a Strategic Framework. Proceeding POMS 2007 Conference 2007, Dallas, 4-7 May 2007.
- Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing Disruption Risks in Supply Chains. Production and Operations Management, 14.1, 53-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00009.x
- Lockamy III, A. (2011). Benchmarking Supplier Risks Using Bayesian Networks. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18, 409-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635771111137787
- Manuj, I., & Mentzer, J. T. (2008). Global Supply Chain Risk Management Strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38, 192-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09600030810866986