Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Analysis of the Dependence of Stock Risk Based on Copula Theory
College of Science, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, China
College of Science, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, China
College of Science, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, China
- 1 College of Science, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, China
- 2 College of Science, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, China
- 3 College of Science, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, China
Journal of Financial Risk Management·Volume 08 (2019)·Pages 224–231·Published 19 November 2019·DOI10.4236/jfrm.2019.84015
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
The rapid development of the economy emphasizes the importance of financial risk. Financial risk analysis can help people understand finance more deeply and reduce the loss of profits. This paper is about the dependence on stocks, which is very important for analyzing the dependence structure of stock market and the portfolio risk of investment market. The experimental data are the daily closing price data of shares of Midea Group and Gree Electric. Copula theory is used to fit the daily return data of Gree Electric and Midea Group. By establishing the correlation structure model of the stock market, the daily return data of Gree Electric and Midea Group are better simulated.
KeywordsStock RiskDependenceCopula Function
- Hammoudeh, S., Nguyen, D. K., Reboredo, J. C., & Wen, X. (2014). Dependence of Stock and Commodity Futures Markets in China: Implications for Portfolio Investment. Emerging Markets Review, 21, 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2014.09.002
- Longin, F., & Solnik, B. (2001). Extreme Correlation of International Equity Markets. The Journal of Finance, 56, 649-676. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00340
- Nelsen, R. B. (2006). An Introduction to Copulas. An Introduction to Copulas.
- Wang, H. H., & Ke, B. (2005). Efficiency Tests of Agricultural Commodity Futures Markets in China. Australian Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics, 49, 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2005.00283.x