Aquatic habitat assessments encompass large and small wadeable streams which vary from many meters wide to ephemeral. Differences in stream sizes within or across watersheds, however, may lead to incompatibility of data at varying spatial scales. Specifically, issues caused by moving between scales on large and small streams are not typically addressed by many forms of statistical analysis, making the comparison of large (>30 m wetted width) and small stream (<10 m wetted width) habitat assessments difficult. Geographically weighted regression (GWR) may provide avenues for efficiency and needed insight into stream habitat data by addressing issues caused by moving between scales. This study examined the ability of GWR to consistently model stream substrate on both large and small wadeable streams at an equivalent resolution. We performed GWR on two groups of 60 randomly selected substrate patches from large and small streams and used depth measurements to model substrate. Our large and small stream substrate models responded equally well to GWR. Results showed no statistically significant difference between GWR R 2 values of large and small stream streams. Results also provided a much needed method for comparison of large and small wadeable streams. Our results have merit for aquatic resource managers, because they demonstrate ability to spatially model and compare substrate on large and small streams. Using depth to guide substrate modeling by geographically weighted regression has a variety of applications which may help manage, monitor stream health, and interpret substrate change over time.
KeywordsStream Habitat ModelingGeographically Weighted RegressionSpatial ScaleHabitat InterpolationGeographic Information System
Gido, K.B., Falke, J.A., Oakes, R.M. and Hase, K.J. (2006) Fish-Habitat Relations across Spatial Scales in Prairie Streams. In: Hughes, R.M., Wang, L. and Seelbach, P.W., Eds., Landscape Influences on Stream Habitats and Biological Assemblages, American Fisheries Society Symposium 48, Bethesda, 265-285.
Rosenfeld, J. (2003) Assessing the Habitat Requirements of Stream Fishes: An Overview and Evaluation of Different Approaches. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 132, 953-968. https://doi.org/10.1577/T01-126
Winemiller, K.O., Flecker, A.S. and Hoeinghaus, D.J. (2010) Patch Dynamics and Environmental Heterogeneity in Lotic Ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 29, 84-99. https://doi.org/10.1899/08-048.1
Gotway, C.A. and Young, L.J. (2002) Combining Incompatible Spatial Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 632-648. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214502760047140
Scott, J., Heglund, P.J. and Morrison, M.L. (2002) Predicting Species Occurrences. Issues of Accuracy and Scale. Island Press, Washington DC.
Sheehan, K.R. and Welsh, S.A. (2013) Accuracy of Stream Habitat Interpolations across Spatial Scales. Journal of Geographic Information System, 5, 602-612. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2013.56057
Hansen, W.F. (2001) Identifying Stream Types and Management Implications. Forest Ecology and Management, 143, 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00503-X
Ian, M. (1999) The Importance of Physical Habitat Assessment for Evaluating River Health. Fresh Water Biology, 41, 373-391. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00437.x
Allan, J.D. and Castillo, M.M. (2007) Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Gorman, O.T. and Karr, J.R. (1978) Habitat Structure and Stream Fish Communities. Ecology, 59, 507-515. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936581
Knighton, D. (1998) Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective. Oxford University Press, New York.
Bradford, M.J. and Heinonen, J.S. (2008) Low Flows, Instream Flow Needs and Fish Ecology in Small Streams. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 33, 165-180. https://doi.org/10.4296/cwrj3302165
Chisholm, I.M., Hubert, W.A. and Wesche, T.A. (1987) Winter Stream Conditions and Use of Habitat by Brook Trout in High-Elevation Wyoming Streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 116, 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1987)116 2.0.CO;2
Harvey, B. and Stewart, A. (1991) Fish size and Habitat Depth Relationships in Headwater Streams. Oecologia, 87, 336-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634588
Minns, C.K. (2001) Science for Freshwater Fish Habitat Management in Canada: Current Status and Future Prospects. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 4, 423-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/146349801317276099
Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D’Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., et al. (2001) Forecasting Agriculturally Driven Global Environmental Change. Science, 292, 281. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1057544
Vitousek, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Lubchenco, J. and Melillo, J.M. (1997) Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems. Science, 277, 494. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.494
Rastetter, E.B., King, A.W., Cosby, B.J., Hornberger, G.M., O’Neill, R.V. and Hobbie, J.E. (1992) Aggregating Fine-Scale Ecological Knowledge to Model Coarser-Scale Attributes of Ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 2, 55-70. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941889
Wheatley, M. and Johnson, C. (2009) Factors Limiting Our Understanding of Ecological Scale. Ecological Complexity, 6, 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2008.10.011
Borcard, D., Legendre, P. and Drapeau, P. (1992) Partialling out the Spatial Component of Ecological Variation. Ecology, 73, 1045-1055. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940179
González-Megías, A., Gómez, J.M. and Sánchez-Pinero, F. (2005) Consequences of Spatial Autocorrelation for the Analysis of Metapopulation Dynamics. Ecology, 86, 3264-3271. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0387
Legendre, P. (1993) Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? Ecology, 74, 1659-1673. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939924
Levin, S.A. (1992) The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture. Ecology, 73, 1943-1967. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941447
Townsend, C.R., Dolédec, S., Norris, R., Peacock, K. and Arbuckle, C. (2003) The Influence of Scale and Geography on Relationships between Stream Community Composition and Landscape Variables: Description and Prediction. Freshwater Biology, 48, 768-785. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01043.x
Windle, M.J.S., Rose, G.A., Devillers, R. and Fortin, M.J. (2009) Exploring Spatial Non-Stationarity of Fisheries Survey Data Using Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR): An Example from the Northwest Atlantic. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 67, 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsp224
An, K.-J., Lee, S.-W., Hwang, S.-J., Park, S.-R. and Hwang, S.-A. (2016) Exploring the Non-Stationary Effects of Forests and Developed Land within Watersheds on Biological Indicators of Streams Using Geographically-Weighted Regression. Water, 8, 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8040120
Charlton, M., Fotheringham, S. and Brunsdon, C. (2005) Geographically Weighted Regression. NCRM Methods Review Papers (NCRM/006).
Fotheringham, A.S., Charlton, M. and Brunsdon, C. (1996) The Geography of Parameter Space: An Investigation of Spatial Non-Stationarity. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 10, 605-627. https://doi.org/10.1080/026937996137909
Kupfer, J. and Farris, C. (2007) Incorporating Spatial Non-Stationarity of Regression Coefficients into Predictive Vegetation Models. Landscape Ecology, 22, 837-852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9058-2
Sheehan, K.R., Strager, M.P. and Welsh, S.A. (2013) Advantages of Geographically Weighted Regression for Modeling Benthic Substrate in Two Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem Streams. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 18, 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-012-9334-2
Brunsdon, C. (1995) Estimating Probability Surfaces for Geographical Point Data: An Adaptive Kernel Algorithm. Computers & Geosciences, 21, 877-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(95)00020-9
Austin, M. (2007) Species Distribution Models and Ecological Theory: A Critical Assessment and Some Possible New Approaches. Ecological Modelling, 200, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.005
Wang, L., Lyons, J., Kanehl, P. and Bannerman, R. (2001) Impacts of Urbanization on Stream Habitat and Fish across Multiple Spatial Scales. Environmental Management, 28, 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s0026702409
Ali, K., Partridge, M.D. and Olfert, M.R. (2007) Can Geographically Weighted Regressions Improve Regional Analysis and Policy Making? International Regional Science Review, 30, 300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017607301609
Gao, X., Asami, Y. and Chung, C.J.F. (2006) An Empirical Evaluation of Spatial Regression Models. Computers and Geosciences, 32, 1040-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2006.02.010
LeSage, J.P. (2001) A Family of Geographically Weighted Regression Models. In: Anselin, L., Florax, R.J. and Rey, S.J., Eds., Advances in Spatial Econometrics, Springer, Berlin, 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05617-2_11
Zhang, L. and Gove, J.H. (2005) Spatial Assessment of Model Errors from Four Regression Techniques. Forest Science, 51, 334-346.
Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, S. and Charlton, M. (2000) Geographically Weighted Regression as a Statistical Model. Unpublished Working Paper, Department of Geography, University of Newcastle, Newcastle.
Koenker, R. (1981) A Note on Studentizing a Test for Heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 17, 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(81)90062-2
Moran, P.A.P. (1953) The Statistical Analysis of the Canadian Lynx Cycle. I. Structure and Prediction. Australian Journal of Zoology, 1, 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO9530163
Smith, G.H.S. and Ferguson, R.I. (1995) The Gravel-Sand Transition along River Channels. Journal of Sediment Research, 65, 423-430. https://doi.org/10.1306/D42680E0-2B26-11D7-8648000102C1865D
Kratzer, J.F., Hayes, D.B. and Thompson, B.E. (2006) Methods for Interpolating Stream width, Depth, and Current Velocity. Ecological Modelling, 196, 256-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.004
Gergel, S., Stange, Y., Coops, N., Johansen, K. and Kirby, K. (2007) What Is the Value of a Good Map? An Example Using High Spatial Resolution Imagery to Aid Riparian Restoration. Ecosystems, 10, 688-702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9040-0
Hankin, D.G. and Reeves, G.H. (1988) Estimating Total Fish Abundance and Total Habitat Area in Small Streams Based on Visual Estimation Methods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 45, 834-844. https://doi.org/10.1139/f88-101