Towards Scalable and Interoperable Geospatial Vector Data Federation via a Decentralized Canonical Metadata-Driven Model
- 1 Laboratory of Image Processing for Stereo-Restitution, National Institute of Cartography, Yaounde, Cameroon
- 2 Department of Computer Engineering, Fotso Victor University Institute of Technology, Bandjoun, Cameroon
- 3 Department of Computer Engineering, National Polytechnic High School of Yaounde, Yaounde, Cameroon
Abstract
In complex and distributed environments, geospatial vector data is vital for planning, analysis, and decision-making. Yet centralized architectures often limit data producers autonomy, create scalability challenges, and hinder seamless sharing across institutional boundaries—particularly in heterogeneous systems with varying metadata standards. Existing spatial infrastructures are largely optimized for both raster and vector data and rely on centralized repositories or tightly coupled systems. These approaches provide limited support for decentralized governance, flexible metadata management, and federated access to vector datasets, which are crucial for autonomy and interoperability. This study introduces a metadata-driven model to federate access to distributed geospatial vector data while preserving contributor sovereignty. The model consists of three layers: 1) Presentation Layer—offers user interface tools for querying and visualizing geospatial data. 2) Semantic Layer—manages a canonical metadata schema replicated across stakeholders via a federated LDAP directory and distributed Directory Information Tree, ensuring consistent yet autonomous governance. 3) Federation Layer—enables remote data retrieval through an access engine, APIs, and GeoJSON formatting without enforcing global standardization. The system supports flexible mappings for non-core metadata fields, avoiding data loss and allowing local customization. This model advances spatial data infrastructures by enabling decentralized, scalable, and interoperable sharing. It reduces reliance on centralized map servers, mitigates synchronization latency, and facilitates conflict resolution across domains. Most importantly, it fosters collaborative environments where producers retain control of their assets while contributing to unified decision-support systems. The model provides a foundation for open, federated platforms in environmental monitoring, urban planning, and smart governance.
- Janowicz, K., Scheider, S., Pehle, T. and Hart, G. (2012) Geospatial Semantics and Linked Spatiotemporal Data—Past, Present, and Future. Semantic Web , 3, 321-332. https://doi.org/10.3233/sw-2012-0077
- Fernandes, E., Jung, J. and Prakash, A. (2016) Security Analysis of Emerging Smart Home Applications. 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy ( SP ), San Jose, 22-26 May 2016, 636-654. https://doi.org/10.1109/sp.2016.44
- Tyler, M. (2005) Web Mapping Illustrated: Using Open Source GIS Toolkits. O’Reilly.
- Stefan, C. (1997) Föderierte datenbanksysteme. Springer.
- Paul, M., Ghosh, S. and Acharya, P. (2006) Enterprise Geographic Information System (E-GIS): A Service-based Architecture for Geo-spatial Data Interoperability. 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , Denver, 31 July-4 August 2006, 229-232. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2006.63
- Goodchild, M.F. (2007) Citizens as Sensors: The World of Volunteered Geography. GeoJournal , 69, 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y
- Foerster, T., Stoter, J. and Van Oosterom, P. (2012) On-Demand Base Maps on the Web Generalized according to User Profiles. International Journal of Geographical Information Science , 26, 99-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.574292
- Butenuth, M., Gösseln, G.v., Tiedge, M., Heipke, C., Lipeck, U. and Sester, M. (2007) Integration of Heterogeneous Geospatial Data in a Federated Database. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , 62, 328-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.04.003
- Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) (2011) OGC Web Services Standard.
- Nebert, D., Whiteside, A. and Voges, U. (2007) OGC Catalogue Services Specification 2.0.2. Open Geospatial Consortium.
- Florczyk, A.J., Lopez-Pellicer, F.J., Nogueras-Iso, J. and Javier Zara-Zaga-Soria, F. (2012) Automatic Generation of Geospatial Metadata for Web Resources. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research , 7, 151-172.
- Granell, C., Díaz, L. and Gould, M. (2010) Service-Oriented Applications for Environmental Models: Reusable Geospatial Services. Environmental Modelling & Software , 25, 182-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.08.005
- le Moigne, J., Smith, B.D., Rogers, L.J., Little, M.M., Ranson, K.J., Morris, R.A. and Oza, N.C. (2023) “What Now/What Next/What If” or NASA Earth System Digital Twins. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=11215672