Drone Bombings in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas: Public Remote Sensing Applications for Security Monitoring
- 1 Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, USA
- 2 Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, USA
- 3 Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, USA
- 4 Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, USA
Abstract
Drone bombing, as a US defense strategy in Pakistan, began under the George W. Bush administration as part of the “US War on Terrorism” and has accelerated under the Obama administration. The United States government has not confirmed the use of drones in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas of Pakistan. We identify the region within the Federally Administered Tribal Areas with the highest incidence of drone bombing activity and use QuickBird imagery to identify evidence of drone bombing damage. The city of Miram Shah in North Waziristan had the highest incidence of drone bombings before January 1, 2010. A systematic research in 1 km2 grids over the city of Miram Shah revealed potential damage of a drone bombing at one site, recent damage at one site, and an image of a drone over the landscape. Results suggest that drone bombings are very accurate and drone missions are common in the region. It is possible for the public to monitor drone bombings and other quality of life indicators in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas. The use of drones to monitor and attack enemy locations will most likely expand in the future.
- M. E. O’Connell, “Unlawful Killing with Combat Drones: A Case Study of Pakistan,” Notre Dame Legal Studies Research Paper, Vol. 43, No. 9, 2009, pp. 2-26.
- B. R. Posen, “The Struggle against Terrorism: Grand Strategy, Strategy, and Tactics,” International Security, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2001, pp. 39-55. doi:10.1162/016228801753399709
- The Center for American Progress, “US Airstrikes in Pakistan on the Rise,” 2009. http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/03/pakistan_map.html
- R. A. Beck, “Remote Sensing and GIS as Counterterrorism Tools in the Afghanistan War: A Case Study of the Zhawar Kili Region,” The Professional Geographer, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2002, pp. 188-190. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.5502005
- J. Agnew, T. W. Gillespie, J. Gonzalez and B. Min, “Baghdad Nights: Evaluating the US Military “Surge” Using Nighttime Light Signatures,” Environment and Planning, Vol. 40, No. 10, 2008, pp. 2285-2295.
- C. Perkins and M. Dodge, “Satellite Imagery and the Spectacle of Secret Spaces,” Geoforum, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2009, pp. 546-560. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.04.01
- L. Parks, “Digging into Google Earth: An Analysis of ‘Crisis in Darfur’,” Geoforum, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2009, pp. 535-545. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.04.004
- A. H. Siddiqi, “Society and Economy of the Tribal Belt in Pakistan,” Geoforum, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1987, pp. 65-79. doi:10.1016/0016-7185(87)90021-2
- Government of Pakistan, “Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) Federally Administered Tribal Areas,” Planning and Development Department, FATA Secretariat, Peshawar, 2009.
- British Broadcasting Corporation, “Mapping US Drone and Islamic Militant Attacks in Pakistan,” 2011. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-10648909
- New America Foundation, “The Year of the Drone: An Analysis of US Drone Strikes in Pakistan, 2004-2011,” 2011. http://counterterrorism.newamerica.net/drones
- R. A. Efroymsona, W. Hargrovea, D. S. Jones, L. L. Pater, and G. W. Suter, “The Apache Longbow-Hellfire Missile test at Yuma Proving Ground: Ecological Risk Aassessment for Missile Firing,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, Vol. 14, No. 5, 2008, pp. 898-918. doi:10.1080/1080703080238750
- GeoEye, Accessed 10 January 2010. http://www.geoeye.com
- USAID, “USG Humanitarian Assistance to Conflict-Affected Populations in Pakistan in FY 2008 and to date in FY 2009,” 2009, Accessed 2 January 2010. http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900sid/HHOO-7VGTM6?OpenDocument