Peri-Urban Transformations in Agricultural Landscapes of Perugia, Italy
- 1
Abstract
Urban fringes represent very complex landscapes because of their proximity and mutual dependency with cities and rural areas. These landscapes may be considered as transition entities characterized by fuzzy boundaries. An uncontrolled development of urban sprawl and land use changes in these areas may deter- mine negative impacts on all natural, economic and social components. Thus, urban fringes assume a key-role in modern landscape analysis, planning and management. Landscape analysis of these interfaces, as this study shows, can be effectively supported by GIS spatial modelling. The Settlement Density Index (SDI), developed through GIS spatial analysis techniques, expresses punctually the territorial gradients generated by the presence of settlements and allows the identification of the urban fringes in the two periods under invest-tigation. These areas are then characterized and analyzed quantitatively using detailed land use data. The comparison of the diachronic information highlights the transformations of peri-urban landscapes that appear mainly related to the modifications of spatial configuration of urban areas and to the changes of agricultural systems.
- C. Tacoli, “Rural–Urban Interactions: A Guide to the Literature,” Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1998, pp. 147-166. Hdoi:10.1177/095624789801000105
- European Economic and Social Committee, Peri-urban agriculture, Opinion No. 1209, 2004.
- R. E. Romagna, “Lungo I Bordi”–Progetto Diriquali- ficazione del Paesaggio Agrario di Margine, Quaderno Tecnico, 2008.
- B. Murgante, L. Casas, G. A. Sansone, “A spatial rough set for locating the periurban fringe.” In Batton-Hubert M., Joliveau T. and Lardon S. (dir.), Rencontres inter- nationales Géomatique et territoire, SAGEO,2007.
- P. A. Burrough and A. U. Frank, “Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries,” Taylor & Francis, Lon- don, 1996.
- J. Cavailhès, D. Peeters, E. Sekeris and J. Thisse, “The Peri-Urban City: Why to Live between the Suburbs and the Countryside,” Regional Science and Urban Econom- ics, Vol. 34, No. 6, 2004.
- A. Valentini, “Il Senso del Confine – Colloquio con Piero Zanini,” Progettare sui limition Ri-Vista Ricerche per la progettazione del paesaggio, Università degli Studi di Firenze, anno 4, numero, 70-74, Firenze University Press, Firenze.
- L. M. Bridges, A. E. Crompton and J. A. Schaefer, “Land- scapes as Gradients: The Spatial Structure of Terres-trial Ecosystem Components in Southern Ontario,” Eco-Logical Complexity, Vol. 4, 2007, pp. 34-41. Hdoi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2006.05.001
- M. J. McDonnell and S. T. A. Pickett, “Ecosystem Struc- ture and Function along Gradients of Urbanization: An Unexploited Opportunity for Ecology,” Ecology, Vol. 71, No. 4, 1990, pp. 1231-1237.
- M. J. McDonnell and A. K. Hahs, “The Use of Gra-Dient Analysis Studies in Advancing Our Understanding of the Ecology of Urbanising Landscapes: Current Status and Future Directions,” Landscape Ecology, Vol. 23, No. 10, 2008, pp. 1143-1155. Hdoi:10.1007/s10980-008-9253-4
- R. M. Brook and J. D. Davila, “The Peri-Urban Interface: A Tale of Two Cities,” University of Wales and Develop- ment Planning Unit, University College London, UK, 2000.
- A. Allen, “Environmental Planning and Management of the Peri-Urban Interface: Perspectives on an Emerging Field,” Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2003, pp. 135-148.
- A. G. Wilson, “Ecological and Urban Systems Models: Some Explorations of Similarities in the Context of Complexity Theory,” Environment and Planning, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2006, pp. 633- 646. Hdoi:10.1068/a37102