Accuracy Assessment and Comparative Analysis of IDW, Spline and Kriging in Spatial Interpolation of Landform (Topography): An Experimental Study
- 1 Department of Geoinformatics and Surveying, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
- 2 Department of Geoinformatics and Surveying, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
- 3 Department of Geoinformatics and Surveying, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
- 4 Department of Geoinformatics and Surveying, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
Abstract
It is practically impossible and unnecessary to obtain spatial-temporal information of any given continuous phenomenon at every point within a given geographic area. The most practical approach has always been to obtain information about the phenomenon as in many sample points as possible within the given geographic area and estimate the values of the unobserved points from the values of the observed points through spatial interpolation. However, it is important that users understand that different interpolation methods have their strength and weaknesses on different datasets. It is not correct to generalize that a given interpolation method (e.g. Kriging, Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), Spline etc.) does better than the other without taking into cognizance, the type and nature of the dataset and phenomenon involved. In this paper, we theoretically, mathematically and experimentally evaluate the performance of Kriging, IDW and Spline interpolation methods respectively in estimating unobserved elevation values and modeling landform. This paper undertakes a comparative analysis based on the prediction mean error, prediction root mean square error and cross validation outputs of these interpolation methods. Experimental results for each of the method on both biased and normalized data show that Spline provided a better and more accurate interpolation within the sample space than the IDW and Kriging methods. The choice of an interpolation method should be phenomenon and data set structure dependent.
- Kreyszig, E. (2003) Advanced Engineering Mathematics. 8th Edition, John Wiley and Sons (Asia) Pte., Ltd., Singapore.
- Collins, F.C. and Bolstad, P.V. (1996) A Comparison of Spatial Interpolation Techniques in Temperature Estimation. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference/Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barbara, Santa Fe, NM; Santa Barbara, CA.
- Burrough, P.A. and McDonnell, R.A. (1998) Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Li, J. and Heap, A.D. (2008) A Review of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Environmental Scientists. Geoscience Australia, Record 2008/23, 137.
- Heuvelink, G.B.M. and Webster, R. (2001) Modeling Soil Variation: Past, Present, and Future. Geoderma, 100, 269-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00025-8
- Hengl, T. (2009) A Practical Guide to Geostatistical Mapping. http://spatial-analyst.net/book/
- Mitas, L. and Mitasova, H. (2005) Spatial Interpolation. In: Longley, P.A., Goodchild, M.F., Maguire, D.J. and Rhind, D.W., Eds., Geographic Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Management and Applications, 2nd Edition, Vol. 1, Part 2, Chapter 34. www.geos.ed.ac.uk/~gisteac/gis_book_abridged/
- Tobler, W.R. (1970) A Computer Model Simulation of Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography, 46, 234-240. https://doi.org/10.2307/143141
- Watson, D.F. (1992) Contouring: A Guide to the Analysis and Display of Spatial Data. Pergamon, Oxford.
- Isaaks, E.H. and Srivastava, R.M. (1989) Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York.
- Webster, R. and Oliver, M. (2001) Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, 271.
- Ripley, B.D. (1981) Spatial Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 252. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471725218
- Brus, D.J., et al. (1996) The Performance of Spatial Interpolation Methods and Choropleth Maps to Estimate Properties at Points: A Soil Survey Case Study. Environmetrics, 7, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(199601)7:1 3.0.CO;2-Y
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2004) Developing Spatially Interpolated Surfaces and Estimating Uncertainty. EPA-454/R-04-004, EPA Publication, NC.