Spatial Analysis to Identify Urban Areas with Higher Potential for Social Investment
- 1 Department of Geography, Tourism and Humanities, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Sorocaba, Brazil
- 2 Department of Environmental Science, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Sorocaba, Brazil
- 3 Department of Geography, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Brazil
- 4 Department of Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Sorocaba, Brazil
- 5 Department of Geography, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil
- 6 Department of Geography, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil
Abstract
There has been great interest on the part of public and private initiatives in knowing the location of urban areas with potential for investments in social resources. The aim of the present article is to propose a methodology to identify such areas, using the city of S ã o Paulo (Brazil) as a case study. This approach, supported by The Geographic Information System (GIS), is based on multicriteria analysis and quantification of spatial data. The results, presented spatially in a synthesis map, made possible to identify promissory areas for social investment in S ã o Paulo. The method allows us to analyze data at different spatial scales from the GIS base, enabling a systematization to find out areas with higher potential for investment in social equipment, services and facilities. Furthermore, it gives possibility of modeling several variables, thus being adaptable to different geographic areas.
- Teixeira, L.S. (2004) Corporate Social Responsibility. Legislative Consulting of The Brazilian National Congress, Brasília.
- Friedman, M. (1970) The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970. http://www.colorado.edu/studentgroups/libertarians/issues/friedman-soc-resp- business.html
- Ethos Institute Guide for Tools Compatibility, São Paulo, Ethos, 2014.
- Zhang, Y.J., Li, A.J. and Fung, T. (2012) Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Conflict Resolution in Land Use Planning. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 13, 2264-2273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.215
- Lang, S. and Blaschke, T. (2009) Landscape Analysis with GIS. Oficina de Texto, São Paulo, 424 p.
- Rico, E.M. (2004) Corporate Social Responsibility and the State: An Alliance for Sustainable Development. São Paulo in Perspective, 18, 73-82. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/spp/v18n4/a09v18n4.pdf
- Ricomini, V.V., Pinto, M. and Queiroz, E. (2013) Presentation. In: Itaú Social Foundation, Roberto Marinho Foundation, Maria Cecília Souto Vidigal Foundationand Move, Eds., II International Seminar: Evaluation for Private Social Investment: Methodologies, Santillana Foundation, Rio de Janeiro. http://moderna.com.br/lumis/portal/file/fileDownload.jsp?fileId=8A8A8A824279AC F101427B602DC93A3E
- Carley, M.J. (1981) Social Measurement and Social Indicators: Issues of Policy and Theory. Boston, Mass., George Allen & Unwin, 1981. x, 195 p. (Contemporary Social Research Series, No. 1).
- Miles, I. (1985) Social Indicators for Human Development. United Nations University.
- McEwin, M. (1995) Social Indicators and Social Statistics in Australia. Statistical Journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 12, 309-318.
- Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (2012) Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges. Policy Press.
- Bouget, D., Frazer, H., Marlier, E., Sabato, S. and Vanhercke, B. (2015) Social Investment in Europe. A Study of National Policies. European Commission, Brussels Google Scholar.
- Kaztman, R. (2001) Seduced and Abandoned: The Social Isolation of Urban Poor. Revista de la CEPAL, Santiago do Chile, No. 75, 171-189.
- Davis, M. (2006) Planet Slum. Boitempo, São Paulo.