Digitizing the Undigitized: Converting Traditional Archaeological Records into Computerized, Three-Dimensional Site Reconstruction
- 1 Institute of Archaeology, Martin (Szusz) Department of Land of Israel Studies and Archaeology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Abstract
Archaeological excavation involves disintegration, removal, and reassembly of the archaeological record; as such it is considered by many to be an unrepeatable, destructive activity. This perception has contributed to an advancement in archaeological practice, namely, the development of computerized recording systems that digitally record archaeological excavations spatially and volumetrically during fieldwork. This paper is concerned with those archaeological sites where digital field recording has not been done. These sites, recorded by traditional methods, should not be excluded from attempts to restructure the spatial, volumetric, and stratigraphic archaeological data. A thorough methodology for the conversion of traditional records into digitized data is presented, including the detailed procedures required for three-dimensional plotting of recorded data—both the excavated material and the drawn site maps and cross-sections. Finally, the use of these methods is demonstrated on a complex Early to Middle Pleistocene site, illustrating the benefits of digitization and three-dimensional reconstruction in resolving stratigraphic and spatial questions.
- Roskams, S. (2001) Excavation (Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Barker, P. (1993) Techniques of Archaeological Excavation. Batsford, London.
- Lucas, G. (2001) Destruction and the Rhetoric of Excavation. Norwegian Archaeology Review, 34, 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293650119347
- Tanaka, E. (2015) Heritage Destruction in Context: The Case of the Roman Mosaics from Zeugma, Turkey. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21, 336-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2014.964287
- Clarke, M. (2015) The Digital Dilemma: Preservation and the Digital Archaeological Record. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 3, 313-330. https://doi.org/10.7183/2326-3768.3.4.313
- Roosevelt, C.H., Cobb, P., Moss, E., Olson, B.R. and ünlüsoy, S. (2015) Excavation Is Destruction Digitization: Advances in Archaeological Practice. Journal of Field Archaeology, 40, 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042458215Y.0000000004
- Benavides López, J.A., Aranda Jiménez, G., Sánchez Romero, M., Alarcón García, E., Fernández Martín, S., Lozano Medina, A., et al. (2016) 3D Modelling in Archaeology: The Application of Structure from Motion Methods to the Study of the Megalithic Necropolis of Panoria (Granada, Spain). Journal of Archaeological Science, 10, 495-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.11.022
- Howland, M.D., Kuester, F. and Levy, T.E. (2014) Structure from Motion: Twenty-First Century Field Recording with 3D Technology. Near Eastern Archaeology, 77, 187-191. https://doi.org/10.5615/neareastarch.77.3.0187
- Katsianis, M., Tsipidis, S., Kotsakis, K. and Kousoulakou, A. (2008) A 3D Digital Workflow for Archaeological Intra-Site Research Using GIS. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 655-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2007.06.002
- Morgan, C. and Wright, H. (2018) Pencils and Pixels: Drawing and Digital Media in Archaeological Field Recording. Journal of Field Archaeology, 43, 136-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2018.1428488
- Stal, C., Van Liefferinge, K., De Reu, J., Docter, R., Dierkens, G., De Maeyer, P., et al. (2014) Integrating Geomatics in Archaeological Research at the Site of Thorikos (Greece). Journal of Archaeological Science, 45, 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.02.018
- Wheeler, M. (1954) Archaeology from the Earth. Clarendon, Oxford.
- Kenyon, K.M. (1971) An Essay on Archaeological Techniques: The Publication of Results from the Excavation of a Tell. Harvard Theological Review, 64, 271-279. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816000032545