Indicators of Computer-Mediated Communication Affecting Remote Employee Engagement
- 1 Cox Communications, Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA
- 2 School of Business and Technology, Capella University, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Abstract
In this study, the indicators of computer-mediated communication that affect engagement among remote knowledge workers were analyzed. After conducting an online survey of 133 remote knowledge workers in the U.S., a multiple regression statistical model was used to answer the research question seeking the extent to which empathy, expressiveness, and motivation contributed to remote employee engagement. Our findings suggested the existence of a statistically significant relationship between the independent variables Empathy, Expressiveness, and Motivation, and the dependent variable Engagement. This study contributed to knowledge by filling the gap in current literature as no previous attempt had been made on analyzing the relationship between engagement and the items identified here. Our findings have implications for researchers and practitioners in that they may assist in guiding future research and work design for remote knowledge workers in the digital and pandemic era. This study can help managers identify remote workers who need the most help. This comes from the observation that remote employees work away from their managers and colleagues and the absence of casual conversations that tend to provide directions or remind them of things to do could hinder their performance in the absence of self-determination.
- Andrew, O. C., & Sofian, S. (2011). Engaging People who Drive Execution and Organizational Performance. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3, 569-575. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajebasp.2011.569.575
- Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How Technology Is Changing Work and Organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 349-375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352
- Castellá, V. O., Abad, A. M. Z., Alonso, F. P., & Silla, J. M. P. (2000). The Influence of Familiarity among Group Members, Group Atmosphere, and Assertiveness on Uninhibited Behavior through Three Different Communication Media. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00012-1
- Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Fields, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. New York: Sage Publications Ltd.
- Lartey, F. M. (2021). Impact of Career Planning, Employee Autonomy, and Manager Recognition on Employee Engagement. Pending Publication.
- Macey, W., & Schneider, B. (2008). The Meaning of Employee Engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x
- Macey, W., Schneider, B., Barbera, K., & Young, S. (2011). Employee Engagement: Tools for Analysis, Practice, and Competitive Advantage. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
- Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper.
- Merriam-Webster (2020) Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
- Pratt, L., Wiseman, R. L., Cody, M. J., & Wendt, P. F. (1999). Interrogative Strategies and Information Exchange in Computer-Mediated Communication. Communication Quarterly, 47, 46-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379909370123
- Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
- Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 600-619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
- Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job Demands, Job Resources, and Their Relationship with Burnout and Engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248